Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Potton Homes Limited in Southend on Sea
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
19 Feb 2014
- Inspectors verified
Gwen Buckley
- URN verified
SC438764
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ensure there is an emergency escape plan that all staff and children are familiar with and have practiced so they know what to do in and emergency (NMS 10.9) p.4
- ensure children and staff are given an opportunity to discuss incidents of restraint they have been involved in, witnessed or been affected by, with a relevant adult. p.4
- Ensure the child is given the opportunity to be debriefed by a responsible adult who had not been involved in the restraint and to talk through their experience within 24 hours. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language5
“Young people say they have someone they can talk with if they are upset.” p.3Care & placements4
“Young people confirm that staff talk to them after restraints.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 609
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC438764 Inspection date 19/02/2014 Inspector Gwen Buckley Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 16/08/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
This home provides long-term and task-centred care to a maximum of six male or female young people who have emotional and behavioural difficulties. This is one of two residential services operated by this privately run organisation, in addition to a school adjacent to this home.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress .
p.3
Progress
The home was judged as good overall at the last inspection in August 2013. The home is maintaining the quality of care and has addressed the recommendations and requirements made at the last inspection.
p.3
Progress
The quality of measures of control records has improved and external monitoring by the Regulation 33 visitor ensure the records are reviewed and well maintained. A new fire risk assessment, undertaken by an independent company is in place. Staff help young people to identify and develop skills needed for adulthood.
p.3
Progress
Shortly after staff and young people arrive at the home, they receive instructions on what to do in case of fire. The last fire evacuation drill recorded was almost six months ago which means young people new to the home have not practiced these drills to check that they know what to do.
p.3
Progress
External professional say the home provides a good quality of care for children with challenging behaviours. Young people say they have someone they can talk with if they are upset. Some young people consider that the way sanctions are imposed is inconsistent. Staff consider any sanction imposed is confidential to each young person and all the young people are not aware of all the sanctions imposed. Young people confirm that staff talk to them after restraints. However, the people talking to them about the incident may have been involved in the restraint of the young person. This does not give the young people the opportunity to talk with someone who was not involved in the incident and who could advocate for them.
p.3
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
ensure there is an emergency escape plan that all staff and children are familiar with and have practiced so they know what to do in and emergency (NMS 10.9) ensure children and staff are given an opportunity to discuss incidents of restraint they have been involved in, witnessed or been affected by, with a relevant adult. Ensure the child is given the opportunity to be debriefed by a responsible adult who had not been involved in the restraint and to talk through their experience within 24 hours. (NMS 3.17 and Children Act 1989 guidance and regulations - volume 5, 2.104)
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion