Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 Apr 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Janet Palmer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Janet Palmer

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+79Very positivemore positive than 80% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivevery effectiveoutstandingstrongeffectivelyclearrigorouswell supported
Criticismdeclineexclusions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,131
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566863 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: jbennett@cfbt.com

p.1

Mr Piers Tolson Headteacher Wellfield Business & Enterprise College Yewlands Drive Leyland Lancashire PR25 2TP

p.1

Enterprise College, Lancashire

Following my visit to your school on 20 March 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Enterprise College, Lancashire

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Enterprise College, Lancashire

 continue building on the good initiatives to improve teaching and learning already being undertaken by the school.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, students, members of the Governing Body, and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated and other relevant documentation such as the school’s behaviour for learning key data indicators.

p.1

Main findings

The process that the school has gone through to enable you to come out of special measures has left you well placed to continue to improve and move the school towards becoming ‘good’. All areas for improvement identified at the last inspection are being tackled effectively and with urgency and commitment. Your school improvement plan (SIP) has clear, detailed milestones for improvements. The plan includes key success criteria linked to well-considered resource implications and realistic timelines. Much of your plan is already underway and early targets to improve the quality of teaching and learning are being met through the application of rigorous data analysis that informs targeted intervention strategies. It is good to see that the SIP goes beyond the areas for improvement identified at the last inspection and includes other initiatives such as further utilising the effectiveness of teaching assistants and strengthening the reward system to encourage academic

p.1

Main findings

endeavour. Your ‘behaviour for learning’ indicators show a steady decline in the number of exclusions as well as improvements in overall attendance figures. Your close analysis of the data has also revealed some anomalies such as the recent fall in attendance of students you have identified as school action plus, enabling you to take speedy actions to address the problem.

p.2

Main findings

The linked initiatives you have put in place to tackle improvements in teaching and learning and in middle leadership are proving effective. Subject leadership in science is now much stronger following a period of instability and as a result, outcomes for students show signs of improvement. A subject knowledge audit of staff in the science department and subsequent buddying programme has ensured teachers’ subject knowledge can be supported by specialists. It is clear that teachers are now accountable for the progress of their classes rather than sharing this responsibility with other teachers. Support from the Institute of Physics and a local authority consultant is also helping the department prepare for curriculum changes.

p.2

Main findings

Both the science and English departments have benefitted from working closely with the very effective mathematics department. Training sessions led by the head of mathematics on data analysis and strategies to use when working with parents are helping to close the pupil premium attainment gap. Middle leaders across the school are now more accountable for the quality of teaching and learning in their departments and are regularly engaged in lesson observations and book scrutiny within and between departments. The marking of students’ work has been a key focus for improvement and students confirm that it is now much more helpful to them. One boy stated that, ‘books get marked much more quickly now’ and another commented that, ‘we now know what to do to improve and we are given the time to do it’.

p.2

Main findings

Students also approve of the changes to teaching and learning since the last inspection. They commented that teaching in science now meets their individual needs because they are well supported and challenged, and that lessons are ‘speeded up’ with ‘teachers making sure you are actually learning’. One boy commented positively that, ‘we all work much harder now’. Students value the rewards system although they would like to see it applied more consistently; they would like to have more opportunities to contribute to the improvement agenda through their school council representatives; and they would prefer to have fewer supply teachers. One girl commented that she would like the school to have a study club for those doing their GCSEs. Leadership at all levels have a good understanding of what needs to be done to sustain improvements. Governance is strong. The governing body have grown in expertise and confidence during the time the school was in special

p.2

Main findings

measures. They are committed, supportive and well placed to continue holding you and senior leaders to account. The development of the link governor role with subject departments is proving effective in keeping governors informed and they welcome the regular engagement they have with student groups. Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

Support from the local authority has reduced as you and your staff have developed and strengthened your capacity to improve at all levels of leadership and in English and science in particular. The local authority continues to provide some consultant support for English and science and have brokered a visit to the science department of a local outstanding school. They are reviewing their contract with the school on a termly basis according to perceived need. The governors in particular have appreciated the help they have received from the local authority and although this is now much reduced they say they feel confident that they can call for further support if they felt they needed it.

p.3

External support

You have already attended Ofsted’s Getting to Good seminar with the Chair of Governors and accompanied members of the English department to the Better English seminar. I hope that you found these helpful. I have contacted the director of STEM education North West who will email you with details of their CPD programme and bespoke services and Mark Williams HMI is expecting to hear from you regarding your possible shadowing of a section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children's Services for Lancashire. Yours sincerely

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion