Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 Apr 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jonathan Brown

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jonathan Brown

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+51Positivemore positive than 51% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelyclearpositivelyimprovingknowledgeable
Criticismnot yetnot improvingnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
768
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566863 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: jbennett@cfbt.com

p.1

Mrs Margaret Beesley Headteacher Hugh Gaitskell Primary School St Anthony's Drive Beeston Leeds West Yorkshire LS11 8AB

p.1

School, Leeds

Following my visit to your school on 25 March 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School, Leeds

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in December 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School, Leeds

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School, Leeds

 make sure the school improvement plan includes clear and measurable targets against which success can be judged over-time  bring more urgency to developing the role of the governing body and their understanding of effective governance  ensure a relentless focus on improving attendance and that this is reflected in the school improvement plan.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher and senior leaders, a group of pupils, middle leaders, governors and a representative of the local authority. I evaluated a range of documentation including: the school improvement plan; data tracking pupils’ progress; monitoring reports and records of lesson observations. In addition we undertook a tour of the school to look briefly at teaching and learning and the changes made to provision since the inspection.

p.2

Context

Since the last inspection two new teaching staff joined the school. One member of the teaching staff has left. A new Chair of the Governing Body has been appointed.

p.2

Main findings

You, your senior leaders and staff have responded positively to the areas for improvement from the previous inspection. You have worked with urgency to take a range of appropriate actions that lay the foundations for improvements in the consistency and quality of teaching and learning across the school. Actions taken include:

p.2

Main findings

 ensuring that pupils are more aware of their targets and the levels they have achieved  making sure teachers use assessment information on prior attainment more effectively to plan appropriate and challenging activities  developing the role of middle leaders so that they understand and that they are accountable for their areas of responsibility  establishing links with a good school in order to observe and share best practice

p.2

Main findings

Systems to check on the quality of teaching and learning have been tightened. There are regular reviews of how pupils are achieving and increasingly staff are held to account for the progress their pupils are making. A recent review carried out across the school shows that these actions are beginning to improve the quality of teaching and learning.

p.2

Main findings

The school improvement plan addresses the areas that need improvement and has prioritised actions linked to improving teaching and learning. It gives a clear picture of proposed actions. Some of the actions required do not have clear milestones or success criteria against which the impact of actions can be systematically monitored and evaluated. This makes it difficult for governors to pinpoint with accuracy how well the school is improving over time. The actions identified to improve attendance are not yet sufficiently developed.

p.2

Main findings

Governors have held a full meeting to agree the school action plan and they are knowledgeable about the actions being undertaken by you and the senior leaders. The plans for their own improvement are not fully developed. Improvements in this aspect must keep pace with the developments elsewhere in the school to help governors fulfil their role to support and challenge senior leaders. Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

External support is provided by the local authority includes visiting the school regularly to review progress and provide guidance. The school also works closely with other schools as part of a learning trust.

p.3

External support

The support from external partners, including the local authority and links with other schools, has been prompt. You have plans for how these links may be used more effectively to help the school improve rapidly.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children's Services for Leeds.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion