Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Leicester City Council in Leicester
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
13 Feb 2014
- Inspectors verified
Catherine Honey
- URN verified
SC039038
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families3
“Consultation and communication with parents has improved.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 790
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC039038 Inspection date 13/02/2014 Inspector Catherine Honey Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 12/07/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
This children's home provides residential care for seven young people with learning difficulties. It is owned and managed by the local authority.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress .
p.3
Progress
At the home's previous inspection in July 2013, the home's overall effectiveness was judged as adequate with good outcomes for children and young people, and good quality of care. Four requirements and three recommendations were made which have been addressed. No regulatory shortfalls were identified at this inspection. The judgement of satisfactory progress reflects the balance between the good progress some young people have achieved since the last inspection, and the deterioration in outcomes for others. Consultation and communication with parents has improved. For example, staff members have supported families to have more valuable time with their children by suggesting different venues for contact visits. This promotes young people's well- being. The Registered Manager's internal monitoring of the quality of care in the home now includes a better overview of consultation with young people, parents and
p.3
Progress
the placing authority. Reports submitted to HMCI, Ofsted show the impact of this consultation. In addition, a revised copy of the homes’ statement of purpose has been submitted to HMCI, Ofsted. These measures mean the regulator has a better overview of activities in the home. At the previous inspection, a shortfall was found in the use of household insecticide within the home. The use of this substance has now been assessed for risk and there guidance is available for its proper use. These health and safety measures help ensure the home is a safe environment for young people to live in. Care planning documents are comprehensive and are kept up-to-date. This means staff can access a clear plan for young people's care which demonstrates any recent changes. The young people's guide now clearly shows how to access an independent advocate. Staff are able to demonstrate a clear understanding of the home's whistleblowing
p.3
Progress
policy. This demonstrates improvements to the arrangements the home has to help keep young people safe. Some young people continue to make very good progress while living at the home. They have made significant developments in their independence skills. For example, young people who needed a very high level of staff support to walk to school are now able to go to school accompanied by one member of staff instead of two. This is a huge achievement in terms of young people's independence, personal development and dignity. Young people use very positive terms when describing the home, and are relaxed and at ease when in the presence of staff. This demonstrates strong relationships between young people and staff. One young person stated, ‘this is the best home ever.' For some young people, levels of disruptive behaviour, rates of going missing from home and risk-taking behaviour have increased. This shows some deterioration in
p.4
Progress
outcomes for these young people. Staff work tirelessly with young people to educate them on the associated dangers and risks of these behaviours, and the home works closely with outside agencies, such as child and adolescent mental health services. This means young people are provided with expert guidance to help them further understand the impact of their behaviour. When young people go missing, there are highly efficient arrangements and protocols in place with the local police who work with staff to return young people safely to the home. Episodes of disruptive behaviour have begun to impact on other young people living in the home, who are showing signs of being unsettled. The Registered Manager and placing authority have recognised this impact and have taken steps to resolve the situation. A social worker stated, ‘staff commitment to my young person has been exceptional.’
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion