Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Apr 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Lisa Moore

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Lisa Moore

  • Postcode verified

    GU46 6NN

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+50Positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedoutstandingclearlyswiftlyclear
Criticismgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
902
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Janette Teague Headteacher Westfields Infant School School Lane Yateley Hampshire GU46 6NN

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 18 March 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you and the deputy headteacher, the Chair and Vice Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority, to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated a range of documentation including the school action plan, information relating to the monitoring of teaching, reports from the local authority representative and some governing body minutes. You took me on a tour of the school and we made brief visits to all classes where I spoke to pupils about their work and looked at their books. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Main findings

Judgements made at the previous inspection were accepted by yourself and the governing body. You and your deputy headteacher are determined to drive improvements forward and have swiftly focused on appropriate actions. The school’s improvement plan covers what needs to be improved and it clearly details what actions will be taken and how and when progress will be measured.

p.2

Main findings

You have made changes to how teachers are expected to plan their lessons and as a result they are planning tasks that better meet a range of pupils’ needs and which provide a more appropriate level of challenge. Activities are more defined and pupils are clearer about what they need to do to succeed. Teachers are required to carefully evaluate the impact of this planning on pupils’ learning in order to continually improve their practice.

p.2

Main findings

The development of pupils’ handwriting skills is a key focus for improvement. You have reviewed and revised your handwriting policy and established clear expectations of practice across the school. Consequently pupils are given more frequent opportunities to engage in handwriting activities. Pupils are recording more of their written work on paper so their progress is easier for everyone to see. You are raising the profile and importance of these skills in a variety of ways, for example through displays of pupils’ written work in each classroom and individual support for pupils who need extra support to improve their handwriting skills.

p.2

Main findings

You have used a variety of methods to inspire boys to write. These have included building writing opportunities into a wide range of activities across the school, inviting a children’s author into school to talk to pupils about their work and reviewing the planned writing topics to ensure they interest and engage boys. Consequently the gaps in achievement in writing between girls and boys are closing.

p.2

Main findings

You have reviewed and revised the timetable of activities in the Early Years Foundation Stage so that pupils have more opportunities to learn in the outside environment. Resources and provision in these classrooms have also been improved so that there are clearly organised areas for different types of learning, for example art activities and mathematics. This means that pupils have a greater choice in learning activities using a wider range of materials.

p.2

Main findings

As a result of the audit you have carried out, you have identified the gaps in mathematics resources available to teachers and you have provided a wider range of materials to support the teaching of mathematics. This helps teachers to draw on a range of teaching strategies in their lessons including problem solving approaches.

p.2

Main findings

Subject leaders have been given a comprehensive and varied range of valuable support and training, including visits to good and outstanding local schools and training from the local authority’s adviser. As a result these subject leaders are developing a greater understanding of their role and formulating whole school plans for their areas of responsibility.

p.2

Main findings

Governors have received useful training from the local authority in refining their role of checking the progress the school is making. A member of the governing body is now linked to each key area of the school’s improvement plan in order to enhance the governors’ understanding of the school’s work. Governors are demonstrating a good understanding of their role in challenging and supporting the headteacher to achieve the targets that have been set.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority has provided a range of effective support. They have provided useful guidance to the headteacher in developing the school’s improvement plan. Local authority advisers have given valuable support to subject leaders to strengthen their role and helped to develop the planning and assessment skills of classroom teachers.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hampshire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion