Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Christopher Moodie
- Postcode verified
CB1 9EJ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment17
“Marking is improving, and most teachers provide pupils with high quality feedback.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 694
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Andrew Hastings Headteacher Colville Primary School Colville Road Cherry Hinton Cambridge CB1 9EJ
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 19 March 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
School
tackle pupils’ under-achievement in writing, especially in Year 4 focus monitoring activities on the impact of teaching on pupils’ progress
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I held meetings with you, the deputy head teacher, a member of the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I also evaluated the school action plans and the school’s monitoring and assessment documentation. You accompanied me during visits to lessons, where we observed teaching and looked at pupils’ work.
p.1
Context
Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 01216 799164 Direct email : tim.ogbourn@serco.com Since the inspection one teacher has gone on maternity leave. A temporary replacement is currently working in the school.
p.1
Main findings
Your action plans focus on the right things. Teaching is improving in the school and this is resulting in better pupil progress. Recent progress is stronger in reading and mathematics than in writing. In Key Stage 2, standards in reading are above average in all year groups. In mathematics, progress is a little slower and pupils are on track to reach the national average by the end of Year 6. In contrast, pupils’ writing is slightly below average in Years 5 and 6, and is well below average in Year 4.
p.2
Main findings
The systematic teaching of phonics is well established. Clear benefits are apparent from the systematic teaching of this area to groups of pupils with similar abilities. Pupils are familiar with the systems and are increasingly confident when reading new or ‘tricky’ words. In other areas, the work that more-able pupils do is not always hard enough, and they make less progress than they could.
p.2
Main findings
Marking is improving, and most teachers provide pupils with high quality feedback. Often this is extensive and points pupils to their next steps. In some cases, teachers have taken this further and pupils are beginning to respond to the marking – making comments and showing that they have both read and understood the guidance.
p.2
Main findings
Governors are well informed and understand the steps that you are taking to improve things. They have increased their monitoring role and are providing you with appropriate levels of both challenge and support. You have time-tabled a series of monitoring activities to check on the quality of teaching. These include you and senior leaders looking at teachers’ planning, scrutinising pupils’ work and watching lessons. However, the outcomes of these activities do not focus sufficiently on pupil progress, and the feedback that teachers receive is not precise enough to accelerate improvements. A more cohesive approach is needed to bring these monitoring activities together and provide more information about exactly what teachers need to work on.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The local authority is providing effective support for the school. It has commissioned leadership support from a National Leader for Education who is the headteacher of an outstanding school. An advisor from the local authority is supporting your monitoring activities and your action plans. Another advisory teacher is supporting you with the development of mathematics.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, and the Director of Children’s Services for Cambridgeshire.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion