Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 3 Apr 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Kevin Sheldrick

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Kevin Sheldrick

  • Postcode verified

    B77 2HH

Page 2 of 3
Page 2 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+60Positivemore positive than 58% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivestrengthimprovedimprovingclearlyconsistent
Criticismslownot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
814
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 45
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mr Peter Hollis Executive Headteacher Oakhill Primary School Glascote Heath Tamworth B77 2HH

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 24 March, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection on 5-6 December 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School

 improve teachers’ questioning so all pupils have increased opportunities to think critically about key aspects of the lesson,  identify more clearly the key indicators that will be used by the governing body to regularly check on the progress being made by different groups of pupils and  ensure a review of governance is undertaken as soon as possible and quickly implement any recommendations.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you and other leaders. A telephone discussion was held with the vice-chair of the Governing Body and a representative Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9166 Direct email : helen.johnson@serco.com of the local authority. The school improvement plan, information related to the tracking of pupils’ progress and the minutes of the governing body meetings were evaluated. Short visits were made to seven lessons to observe teaching

p.1

Context

There have been no changes in context since the last Section 5 inspection.

p.2

Main findings

You are establishing a more effective approach to the teaching of letters and sounds (phonics) in Year 1. As result of this improvement you are anticipating that far more pupils will reach the national expectations in the screening check that takes place in May. Throughout the school a strength in teaching, particularly in mathematics lessons, is that pupils learn quickly because no time is wasted on unnecessary consolidation of learning. However, you have also recognised that there are times when learning could be improved through more effective questioning that ensures pupils have to think more critically about the key aspects of the lesson content.

p.2

Main findings

Your leaders are ensuring high levels of adherence to the school’s policies. As a result pupils are making enhanced progress because teaching is better and marking is more consistent. Although this focus on ensuring consistency served the school well during the period when the school was in special measures you have correctly recognised that further improvement hinges upon leaders being more flexible and taking greater responsibility for bringing about improvement; for instance in building further on the very good assessment practice that exists in the Early Years Foundation Stage and ensuring all subjects contribute more to the development of pupils’ literacy. It was reassuring to hear how you are supporting your leaders in implementing their ideas for further improving your school.

p.2

Main findings

Improvement plans are comprehensive and there is good evidence that you are regularly checking the progress you are making in addressing all the issues identified at the section 5 inspection. Sharp insights were evident in the monitoring you have been undertaking into the quality of teaching. A wide range of relevant assessment information exists and this is being used well by leaders in school to monitor the effectiveness of teaching and other interventions. Less clear is the key information that is to be used by the Governing Body to regularly check on the progress different groups of pupils are making. In addition, the Governing Body has been a little slow in organising the review of governance and implementing changes in response to this.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

You are working very closely with nearby Hanbury’s Farm Primary School because you also lead this school. This is providing opportunities for staff to participate in joint training and to share best practice across both schools; for instance, in the development of more effective questioning. The local authority has organised appropriate consultant support to help ensure the accuracy of key assessments in English and mathematics. The local authority has established regular opportunities to review the progress the school is making. It has agreed to keep HMI informed about the outcomes of these reviews. It would be helpful if additional support from the local authority could focus on further improving the effectiveness of the Governing Body.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services Staffordshire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion