Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
St Damian's RC Science College
Summary
Sally Kenyon (lead), Alan Brine, Osama Abdul Rahim, Timothy Gartside
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 Mar 2014
- Inspectors verified
Alan Brine, Osama Abdul Rahim, Sally Kenyon, Timothy Gartside
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
OL6 8BH
- Name on report verified
St Damian's RC Science College
- URN verified
106270
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.7
- Bus drivers say that the students’ behaviour is excellent and almost all parents who responded to Parent View feel that their child is safe in school and that the school ensures that students are well behaved. p.5
- Standards in English, mathematics and science are good due to much improved, good quality, teaching and highly effective performance management. p.1
- The exceptional leadership of the headteacher has raised standards in the school more than ever before. p.1
- Excellent examples of this were seen in modern foreign languages and in science. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.7
- Not enough teaching promotes outstanding progress because it does not always challenge the most able students. p.1
- Students similarly know that racism and homophobia are totally unacceptable, but work around homophobic bullying has not had the same high profile as racism and cyber-bullying. p.5
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.7
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Continue to improve the quality of teaching, particularly for the most able, by: - planning questions and activities carefully to allow the most-able students to develop their ideas - ensuring that all targets are aspirational and reflect outstanding progress - sharing more widely best practice in assessment and moderation of students’ work. p.3
- allowing students time to consider questions and to plan and develop their responses - ensuring that students consistently receive the necessary support with writing and spelling. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,205
- shorter than usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
St Damian's RC Science College Lees Road, Ashton-Under-Lyne, Lancashire, OL6 8BH
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a good school. The exceptional leadership of the headteacher has raised standards in the school more than ever before. Standards in English, mathematics and science are good due to much improved, good quality, teaching and highly effective performance management. There is high-quality support for students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development by a team of staff, including the school chaplain. Students are polite, well mannered and courteous. They respect and value their teachers. Arrangements to keep students safe are good. Safety is a priority. Students say that behaviour has improved ‘beyond recognition’. They behave extremely well and show very mature attitudes to learning. The senior leadership team and middle leadership teams are strong and provide great capacity for further improvement. The leadership and management of behaviour, attendance, achievement, teaching and learning are clear strengths of the school.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Members of the governing body have strong educational expertise. They, in partnership with the staff, are relentless in their drive to make the school outstanding. They have a good understanding of the quality of teaching and achievement, through careful monitoring.
p.1
It is not yet an outstanding school because
Disabled students and those who have special educational needs do not always receive high- quality support for literacy in lessons. Not enough teaching promotes outstanding progress because it does not always challenge the most able students. Targets for students’ achievement are not consistently aspirational.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors took account of the 62 responses to the online Parent View survey. The inspection team observed 31 part-lessons and made a series of short visits to nine other lessons. Meetings were held with members of the governing body, senior and middle leaders, over 80 students, including representatives of the pupil forum and the entire cast from the school’s production of ‘Fame’. Inspectors scrutinised a wealth of other evidence provided by the school, including self- evaluation, minutes of governing body meetings and examples of performance management. Inspectors also examined a wide sample of students’ work, scrutinised school improvement planning, evidence of students’ current achievement and policies relating to behaviour management and anti-bullying. Inspectors also checked the single central record.
p.2
Inspection team
Sally Kenyon, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Osama Abdul Rahim Additional Inspector Timothy Gartside Additional Inspector Alan Brine Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
This is a smaller than average sized secondary school for students between the ages of 11 and 16. The proportion of students eligible for the pupil premium (government funding to help schools support children of armed forces families, students who are looked after by the local authority and students who are known to be eligible for free school meals) is below average. The proportion of disabled students and those with special educational needs supported through school action is well below the national average. The proportion of students supported by school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is broadly in line with the national average. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress. Two students are educated off-site. One attends Tameside College and the other ‘Brighter Placements’ and ‘The Experience.’
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Continue to improve the quality of teaching, particularly for the most able, by: - planning questions and activities carefully to allow the most-able students to develop their ideas - ensuring that all targets are aspirational and reflect outstanding progress - sharing more widely best practice in assessment and moderation of students’ work.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Further accelerate progress for disabled students and those who have special educational needs by:
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
- allowing students time to consider questions and to plan and develop their responses - ensuring that students consistently receive the necessary support with writing and spelling.
p.3
The achievement of pupils is good
Students start school with abilities typical for their age, although the proportion of more able students is slightly higher than average. Students typically make good progress in lessons and the large majority leave with at least five good GCSE qualifications, including English and mathematics. The proportion of students achieving ‘A-A*’ grades is above average in many subjects and continues to rise. Progress in mathematics was an area of weakness at the previous inspection and it is now a clear area of strength. Students make good progress in mathematics due to good quality teaching. Standards in English have recovered well from last year’s dip in performance and students were observed by inspectors making consistently good progress in both these subjects. Progress in science and religious education is also strong. Year 7 catch-up funding is used well to accelerate reading for all Years 7 and 8 students. This
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
has led to a healthy competition of who can be on the ‘million words tree’, a real status symbol for avid readers. Students who attend off-site provision achieve well and have very good attendance records. Half of the Year 11 cohort has been entered early for GCSE English. Results are already better than last year’s. All students made expected progress with many making much better than expected progress. Those students who achieved ‘B’ grades instead of ‘A-A*’ will be re-entered in the summer. Equality of opportunity is central to the school’s ethos. Any gaps in the attainment of different groups have been identified and are being addressed to good effect. Students who are eligible for the pupil premium are making much better progress. For all abilities in mathematics last year, the number of pupil premium students making better than expected progress was above the national average. In 2013, the gap between the pupil premium students and their peers in English was half a
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
GCSE grade and in mathematics it was one full grade. This demonstrates a year-on-year improvement in the outcomes for this group. The gap is forecast to narrow further this year. Inspectors observed no difference between the progress of those eligible for the pupil premium and that of their peers. Some disabled students and those who have special educational needs make good progress but this is not consistent, principally because they do not always receive the literacy support they need. However, their progress is now rigorously tracked by the new special educational needs coordinator and schemes of work are being reviewed to ensure that they always get appropriate literacy support. Most targets are aspirational and more challenging targets are set for the most able students. However, on a few occasions teachers are allowed to set lower targets for some students which impedes their progress.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
The large majority of teaching observed by inspectors was good and some was outstanding. In a Year 11 science lesson students made outstanding progress due to the teacher’s in-depth subject knowledge and planning. Students explored the reactivity of metals. Any misconceptions they held about ionic and covalent bonding were quickly dispelled by the teacher. Challenging questions ensured that students thought in detail about the subject; progress in books was similarly rapid. Some teachers really challenge students to think for themselves. For example, in a Year 8 religious education lesson, students responded to the question ‘Why do people get married?’ A thought-provoking debate ensued, facilitated well by the highly skilled teacher. The notion of love was discussed along with arranged marriage, forced marriage and people seeking citizenship through marriage. The classroom atmosphere was vibrant; students were very eager
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
to have their say. Unfortunately, not all teaching allows students, particularly the most able, to think about and explore ideas so deeply, which restricts their progress. The pupil forum has been instrumental in raising the quality of teaching. Its members have introduced a system for teachers to give them feedback on their work with an opportunity for them to respond and improve their work. Excellent examples of this were seen in modern foreign languages and in science. Also, on every desk there are clear expectations for presentation in books. High expectations are constantly re-enforced. Assessment, monitoring and tracking are rigorous, particularly in English, mathematics and science. However, not all teachers assess students’ progress accurately enough, particularly in other subjects, where assessments can be over-generous. Some good support for disabled students and those who have special educational needs was
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
seen, and physically disabled students achieve well due to the high expectations and inclusive school ethos. However, in a small minority of lessons students did not receive enough support for writing and spelling and, consequently, did not make good progress. In many lessons, social, moral, spiritual and cultural themes are explored. For example, issues of exploitation and equality were debated in one Year 11 English class and a Year 10 girl wrote a beautiful poem about discrimination, which has been published. However, assembly time is not always used to inspire students and some students say that assemblies are repetitive.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
The behaviour of students is good. This good behaviour is seen in lessons and at social times. The overwhelming majority of students regulate their own behaviour; consequently, little supervision from staff is needed. Bus drivers say that the students’ behaviour is excellent and almost all parents who responded to Parent View feel that their child is safe in school and that the school ensures that students are well behaved. The vast majority of Year 11 students are prefects and proudly wear their distinctive tie. Year 7 students help out in the very busy library at lunchtimes; students are keen to partake in the running of the school. Fixed-term exclusions have fallen dramatically and, when they do occur, they are usually only for one day. The number of students repeatedly excluded is low, an indication that the behaviour system is working well. Referrals to the internal seclusion unit have similarly fallen as the quality
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
of teaching has improved. The school site is well designed and the use of natural materials to create wooden walkways and dry stone walls creates an attractive school environment where students organise themselves into friendship groups. The Eco group grows tomatoes in the summer and tends to a lovely memorial garden. The school’s work to keep students safe and secure is good. Arrangements include risk assessments and good communication for staff on duty at social times. Students say that on the rare occasions that bullying occurs, they know they can tell any member of staff and it will be dealt with and taken seriously. Students have a very strong awareness of cyber-bullying. Mobile phones are not allowed to be used in school and this rule is well observed. Students similarly know that racism and homophobia are totally unacceptable, but work around homophobic bullying has not had the same high profile as racism and cyber-bullying.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Attendance is well above the national average and continues to improve. The attendance of students who are eligible for the pupil premium has increased significantly and is similarly above the national average.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
Leadership is good and there is excellent capacity for further improvement. The leadership of the headteacher is strong and assured; he leads by example. He and his team have the full support of staff and the overwhelming majority of parents. The headteacher knows his staff and students well, and monitors the quality of teaching daily. The tenacious leadership and management of teaching have made the biggest impact on improving achievement. As a result of well-focused staff training, many teachers have improved their performance. Underperformance has been unequivocally tackled. Many staff who received high salaries and whose performance did not meet expectations have left. There is a very clear relationship between performance and pay progression. Newly qualified and recently qualified teachers are well monitored and supported. Some very good practice was seen in lessons taught by those who are relatively new to teaching.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
The curriculum is well matched to students’ needs. There is a small and appropriate offer of vocational subjects but the mainstay of the curriculum is traditional and academic. Students receive good quality information, advice and guidance involving their parents. There is a good range of extra-curricular activities on offer. Students recently performed the musical ‘Fame’. They say that opportunities like this build their confidence and help them make friends across different year groups. The spiritual, moral, social and cultural life of the school is rich and varied, indicative of the inclusive ethos. Lots of charitable work takes place, for example, Year 7 students sell stationery at break-time to raise money to send clothes and toiletries to children in Africa. Middle leaders know their departments well and rigorously track the progress of students as individuals. They lead teaching and learning communities where they share good practice,
p.6
The leadership and management are good
discuss teaching ideas and review schemes of work. However, a number of leaders, including the head of modern foreign languages and the special educational needs coordinator, are newly in post so the impact of their work cannot yet be seen. The local authority provides ‘light-touch’ support for this good school. It has helped governors with some training around school performance data. It feels that the number of students travelling considerable distances to attend St Damian’s is a very good indication of the school’s success. The governance of the school: - Governors have aligned themselves to departments and are using their specialist subject knowledge well to provide a good balance of support and challenge. They have sought training through the local authority and, as a result, have a much better understanding of the school’s performance data. They have supported senior leaders to tackle underperformance.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
- Governors undertake a thorough analysis of examinations and the Chair of the Governing Body conducts unannounced learning walks through classrooms and attends pupil forum meetings so that she understands first-hand how well students are achieving. Governors track the progress of the pupil premium students through their termly meetings with middle leaders. They know where pupil premium funding is spent and know that gaps in achievement are narrowing, but their criteria by which to measure the impact of the funding are too generic and not specific enough to this target group.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 106270 Local authority Tameside Inspection number 426182
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Secondary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 770 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Elizabeth Jones Headteacher Sheldon Logue Date of previous school inspection 28 February 2012 Telephone number 0161 330 5974 Fax number 0161 331 4744 Email address admin@st-damians.tameside.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion