Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
St Edward's Roman Catholic Primary School Blackburn
Summary
James Kidd (lead), Emily Wheeldon
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 Mar 2014
- Inspectors verified
Emily Wheeldon, James Kidd
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Postcode verified
BB3 0AA
- Name on report verified
St Edward’s Roman Catholic Primary School, Blackburn
- URN verified
119666
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2011.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.8
- The school’s work to ensure that its pupils are safe and secure is outstanding. p.1
- Staff morale is strong and teaching and non-teaching staff at all levels of experience and responsibility, speak positively of the senior leadership. p.6
- They are proud of their school and feel safe within its walls. p.1
- Their conduct in lessons is good overall and, on occasion, outstanding. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.8
- Leaders are fully aware that there is not yet enough outstanding teaching and that, although increasing, there is an insufficient proportion of pupils making more than expected progress. p.6
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.8
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Since the previous inspection, there has been a downward trend in pupils’ achievement. p.1
- For example, in 2013 a below average proportion of pupils made expected progress in mathematics and writing. p.1
- In writing, a well below average proportion made more than expected progress. p.1
- Over a two-year period, the quality of teaching has been inconsistent and has not been good enough to ensure that pupils made good or better progress in their studies. p.1
- For example, lesson content and activities have not always been matched closely enough to the needs of different groups of pupils. p.1
- The challenge for the most-able pupils has been inconsistent and not always enabled them to reach the standards of which they capable. p.1
- Assessment strategies to monitor the progress of pupils are not yet fully embedded. p.1
- Staff have not always been fully aware of when pupils were falling behind. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,605
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
St Edward’s Roman Catholic Primary School, Blackburn Blackburn Road, Darwen, Lancashire, BB3 0AA
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
Since the previous inspection, there has been a downward trend in pupils’ achievement. For example, in 2013 a below average proportion of pupils made expected progress in mathematics and writing. In writing, a well below average proportion made more than expected progress. Over a two-year period, the quality of teaching has been inconsistent and has not been good enough to ensure that pupils made good or better progress in their studies. For example, lesson content and activities have not always been matched closely enough to the needs of different groups of pupils. The challenge for the most-able pupils has been inconsistent and not always enabled them to reach the standards of which they capable. Assessment strategies to monitor the progress of pupils are not yet fully embedded. Staff have not always been fully aware of when pupils were falling behind. Occasionally, pupils’ progress slows because they insufficiently learn from each other.
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
There is further scope for pupils to reinforce their writing skills in all the subjects they study.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
The headteacher, deputy headteacher and senior team lead by example. They have put in place well founded strategies to improve the quality of teaching. As a result, teaching and assessment are now much better and pupils’ achievement is improving rapidly. In both Years 5 and 6, for example, progress is accelerating and an increasing proportion of pupils is now making the progress expected. Indeed, a greater proportion is now making better than expected progress. Pupils continue to behave well. They are proud of their school and feel safe within its walls. The school’s work to ensure that its pupils are safe and secure is outstanding. The support for autistic pupils, disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is impressive. The support for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is also of a high order. Governors know the school well and hold leaders to account with rigour.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed 12 part-lessons. They attended the breakfast and after-school clubs and also visited a choir rehearsal on Tuesday lunchtime. Inspectors spoke to three groups of pupils, including school councillors and members of the chaplaincy team. They also spoke informally to pupils at breaks and lunchtimes and during their visits to the breakfast- and after-school clubs. They held discussions with eight governors, including the Chair and vice-chair of the Governing Body. In addition, they spoke to the special educational needs coordinator, the leader for the Early Years Foundation Stage, the mentor for pupils supported by the pupil premium, teaching assistants, subject coordinators and the senior leadership team. Inspectors took account of the 45 responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) and of the 22 responses to the staff questionnaire. They also met informally with parents at the
p.2
Information about this inspection
beginning of the school day. Inspectors observed the school at work and considered a range of documentation, including internal and external pupils’ progress and attainment data, the school’s view of its own performance, school development planning and minutes of governing body meetings. They also scrutinised documentation in relation to child protection, safeguarding, behaviour and attendance.
p.2
Inspection team
James Kidd, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Emily Wheeldon Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
This is a smaller than average sized primary school, with slightly more girls than boys. The proportion of pupils supported at school action is below average. The proportion of pupils supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is also below that usually found. The proportion of pupils eligible for support through the pupil premium (extra money for those pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, those from service families and those looked after by the local authority) is below average. There is a much greater proportion of these pupils in Key Stage 1 than in Key Stage 2. Most pupils are of White British heritage and there are few pupils with English as an additional language. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress. There have been some changes in staff deployment since the previous inspection, with some
p.3
Information about this school
teachers now teaching in different years. The school is a nationally accredited Healthy School and is currently working towards local Healthy Eating School certification. The school also holds Eco-School (Silver) status. There are breakfast and after-school clubs administered by the governing body.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Continue to improve the quality of teaching so that more is outstanding, in order to accelerate pupils’ achievement further by: matching lesson content and activities more closely to the needs of different groups, in order to ensure that all pupils make good or better progress in their studies and that a greater proportion makes more than expected progress ensuring that the challenge for the most able is consistently rigorous enough to enable them to reach the standards of which they capable embedding the strategies in assessment already established to monitor the progress of all pupils from their starting points ensuring that ongoing assessment in class is consistently good enough to identify when pupils are falling behind in their learning giving pupils even more opportunities to learn from each other continuing to provide pupils with opportunities to reinforce their writing skills in all the subjects
p.3
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Children generally enter the Reception class with skills and knowledge below the expectations for their age. They make good progress both academically and personally in the setting and reach broadly average standards by the time they reach Year 1. Since the previous inspection, however, progress has slowed in both Key Stage 1 and lower Key Stage 2, and in 2012 and 2013, attainment by the end of Year 6 was broadly average overall, with standards in writing the least impressive. A below average proportion of pupils made expected progress in writing and mathematics and the proportion making more than expected progress in reading, writing and mathematics was lower than seen nationally. Over time, therefore, pupils’ achievement requires improvement, even though three pupils attained National Curriculum Level 6 in mathematics in 2013. Progress in Key Stage 1 is improving. Pupils now read fluently and with understanding and they
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
use times tables accurately to solve mathematical problems. They are writing more confidently, too, and enjoy making up their own stories. As a result of more accurate and more regular assessment of pupils’ progress and better teaching, achievement across Key Stage 2 is also beginning to accelerate and the most able are now approaching the standards their ability warrants. Increasing numbers of pupils are now making expected progress and in Year 5 in particular, the proportion making better than expected progress is now approaching the national average. Again, pupils enjoy reading and in Year 6, for example, they discuss several methods to use when faced with the pronunciation of complex words with more than three syllables. They read aloud with expression and confidence. Progress in writing is also rising and in the current Year 6 class, there are examples of work at Level 6, which is displayed prominently on the corridor wall, both to celebrate success and to
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
motivate other pupils to reach the same standard. Pupils enjoy mathematics and in Year 5 they calculate percentages of large numbers with accuracy and in Year 6, they are fascinated by the relationships between numbers in sequence. Autistic pupils, disabled pupils and those special educational needs receive strong support from teaching and teaching assistants. They are also making better progress and attaining just as well as their classmates. The small numbers of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals make a judgement on their attainment and progress compared to those of others difficult. However, in 2013 both pupils in Year 6 made expected progress in reading and mathematics and reached broadly average standards in these subjects.
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Teaching requires improvement because, since the previous inspection it has not been good enough to ensure that pupils made good or even better progress in their studies. However, as a result of the school’s overriding concern to improve the quality of teaching, it is now much better with examples of outstanding teaching in Reception, Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2. In the Reception class, for example, children learn well and on occasions exceptionally well in the stimulating outdoor area. They are also becoming fluent and confident speakers as a result of the excellent language skills modelled by the teachers and support assistants. All groups of pupils progress well when the work and classroom activities are matched closely to their different abilities. Where this is not the case, progress slows and, on occasion, some pupils fall behind. This teaching does not enable pupils to make more than expected progress in their
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
studies. Similarly, when ongoing assessment is sharp enough to identify where pupils are experiencing difficulty, approaches are adjusted and pupils’ progress is enhanced. Where this is not the case, a minority of pupils finds the work too difficult and their progress suffers as a result. The challenge for the most able pupils is generally good, but is inconsistent across the school. In Year 6, for example, the most able were motivated by the consideration of the work of Dattaraya Ramchanda Kaprekar, a famous Indian mathematician who completed research on the relationships between numbers. However, occasionally the most able pupils do not have work that makes think more deeply about the subject matter and thus reach the standards of which they capable. The school currently places emphasis on encouraging pupils to learn for themselves, and from each other, for example, through paired and group discussion. Where such activities are used
p.5
The quality of teaching requires improvement
effectively to reinforce pupils’ understanding, progress accelerates. On occasions, however, these opportunities are missed. Teaching assistants work well with disabled pupils and those with special educational needs. As a result, these pupils, and autistic pupils too, can take full advantage of what the classroom activities have to offer. Similarly, the pupil premium mentor provides weekly individual support to pupils known to be eligible for free school meals. This support is tailored closely to their needs and enables these pupils to make the same progress as others. Pupils gain a clear understanding of how to improve their work through regular and thorough marking.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
The behaviour of pupils is good. Their conduct in lessons is good overall and, on occasion, outstanding. They are keen to learn and to work hard, enjoy their lessons and speak highly of the adults who work with them. There is some low-level misbehaviour in class, but pupils say that this is rare and that teachers stop it quickly when it occurs. Children behave well in the Reception class: they play and learn happily together. Pupils enjoy taking on responsibility and older pupils, prefects for example, support younger ones, for example by taking them into the playground at lunchtime. School councillors represent the views of their constituents well and members of the pupil chaplaincy team say ‘We are trying to make our school even more religious.’ They organise a variety of charity events and were actively involved in raising nearly £300 for the Macmillan Cancer appeal. The school’s work to ensure that its pupils are safe and secure is outstanding. Pupils feel safe in
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
school and have a keen understanding of how to keep themselves safe when they are not in school. They value the support they receive from the adults who work with them and comment, ‘The grown-ups look after us and know we can talk to them when we are feeling unhappy.’ All parents who responded to the on-line questionnaire believe their children are safe and happy in school and would recommend the school to other parents. Parents are particularly pleased with the support for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs. Pupils are fully aware of how to use the Internet responsibly and safely. They know the dangers of using social media websites and also of cyber-bullying. Indeed, they believe that bullying in school, including name-calling and bullying based on prejudice is rare and that when it does occur, it is dealt with swiftly and effectively. The school promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well. Pupils
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
demonstrate an enviable social conscience, know the difference between right and wrong and get on well with each other. They enjoy being part of the choir and their singing is a delight to hear. Their understanding of cultures and religions which are different from their own is enhanced by the strong link with a local Muslim school. They receive visits from pupils from this school and also visit the school themselves. In addition, the school delivers tuition in modern languages. Year 6 learns German, Year 5 learns Spanish, Year 4 learn Italian and Year 3 learns French. Pupils also benefit from a wide range of after-school clubs and educational visits, to the Jodrell Bank Discovery Centre, for example. Attendance continues to be above average and pupils invariably arrive at school punctually.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
The dedicated and talented headteacher and deputy headteacher lead by example. They have tackled with success a range of staffing issues and inaccuracies in assessment, which led to a downward trend in pupils’ achievement. As a result, teaching is improving, assessment systems, although not yet fully embedded, are now more rigorous and pupils’ progress is now accelerating apace. Leaders are fully aware that there is not yet enough outstanding teaching and that, although increasing, there is an insufficient proportion of pupils making more than expected progress. Staff morale is strong and teaching and non-teaching staff at all levels of experience and responsibility, speak positively of the senior leadership. In their words, ‘We feel valued here: senior leaders are rigorous and challenging but also fair.’ Middle leaders are effective. They are also grateful for the encouragement they receive to
p.6
The leadership and management are good
develop the areas for which they are responsible. They, too, rightly believe that performance appraisal arrangements are secure and that they lead to relevant in-service training opportunities, attended by all staff, which are designed to enhance classroom practice and thus benefit the pupils in their care. The improvements in teaching are a direct result of this well founded training. The curriculum meets the needs and interests of pupils well. Learners enjoy the ‘theme’ activities, which also lead to a wide range of educational visits. Pupils now have more opportunities to practise their writing skills across the curriculum, but the school recognises that this could be developed further. The breakfast and after-school clubs are well run and well attended. Pupils enjoy the variety of activities and have warm relationships with the staff. The school is ever concerned to ensure that the primary school sport funding is used to promote
p.6
The leadership and management are good
higher participation rates among pupils in games and physical activity. It employs three sports coaches who work with staff to deliver activities during and after school in sport and games. In addition, a local professional runs an after-school dance club for 30 weeks during the year. There is a wide range of after-school sports clubs and, for the first time, the school has a girls’ football team, which takes part in local competitions. Child protection and safeguarding policies and practice fully meet current requirements and are a major strength of the school. The ‘purple files’, held in every class, ensure that the personal and emotional development of each individual child is monitored closely and that any pupils whose circumstances make them potentially vulnerable are supported to the hilt. The school rejects discrimination in all its forms and now supports equality of opportunity well. The local authority provides good support for the school. It funds termly support from a School
p.6
The leadership and management are good
Improvement Partner and a local authority officer continues to be actively involved in helping the school to improve the quality of teaching. The governance of the school: The experienced governing body knows the school well and continues to challenge the leadership with rigour. Members are fully aware of how pupil premium funding is used and keep a close eye on its impact on the progress and attainment of pupils known to be eligible for support through it. Governors have spent much time considering just why achievement declined since the previous inspection and liaised fully with the headteacher to ensure that staffing issues were tackled and that teachers were deployed in the right years to maximise pupils’ progress. This close collaboration with senior leaders is now bearing fruit and pupils’ achievement is accelerating rapidly. The headteacher and senior staff have delivered training to the governing body on how to ask
p.6
The leadership and management are good
questions of the internal and national data on pupils’ progress and attainment. As a result, governors are fully aware of trends in achievement. The governors also monitor closely the school’s attempts to improve the quality of teaching and ensure that teachers receive financial reward only if they meet their targets in relation to pupils’ progress.
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.8
School details
Unique reference number 119666 Local authority Blackburn with Darwen Inspection number 433898
p.9
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.9
School details
Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 202 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Margaret Leatham Headteacher Gerard Keane Date of previous school inspection 19 January 2011 Telephone number 01254 701616 Fax number 01254 761805 Email address st.edwards@blackburn.gov.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.10
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.10
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.10
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.10
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion