Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Margaret Dickinson
- Postcode verified
GU34 4NX
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 756
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Sharron Morton Headteacher Binsted Church of England Primary School Church Street Binsted Alton GU34 4NX
p.1
England Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 11 March 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
England Primary School
The visit was the second formal monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
England Primary School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
England Primary School
provide pupils with more regular opportunities to write at length from their own imagination and experience more investigations and problem-solving activities in mathematics evaluate the quality and depth of pupils’ learning, when checking lessons, rather than the actual teaching. Consider narrowing the focus, on occasions, to what learning is like for different groups.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I met with you to discuss the action taken since the last inspection and the informal visit I made in early October 2013. We observed teaching in Tribal 1–4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5323 Direct email :suzy.smith@tribalgroup.com Reception and Years 1, 2 and 3 together and discussed our findings. I observed a lesson in Year 4. Writing and mathematics work from Years 5 and 6 was evaluated, as these pupils were out of school on a trip. Information about all pupils’ progress was scrutinised, together with reports from your own observations of lessons.
p.1
Context
There have been several changes in teaching staff since the section 5 inspection.
p.2
Main findings
The quality of teaching has shown marked improvement in the Reception and Year 1 class, which was a weak area at my last visit in October. The classroom is more lively and enticing and children are encountering a much better balance of activities. Teachers’ plans take careful account of the children’s different abilities and prior experiences. The teacher is using teaching assistants fully, making sure they are well briefed. One assistant, working with Year 1, used questions effectively to tease out pupils’ thinking and check they understood what they were doing. The teacher also used questions very well to develop children’s communication skills and draw the quieter members of the group into the discussion. Some opportunities were missed to encourage children’s talk when children were using the sand tray and ride-on toys outside.
p.2
Main findings
Pupils’ progress has picked up considerably and the school’s assessments are leading the headteacher to expect improved results this year for pupils in both Year 2 and Year 6. The headteacher sets her sights high and is keen for pupils to reach aspirational targets. Pupils’ pride and engagement in their learning is evident from the well-presented and careful work seen in exercise books. Teachers put a lot of time into marking pupils’ work, in good detail, and older pupils write their own comments, in response to their teacher’s, showing they take note and consider suggestions. Pupils are not encountering investigations and problem-solving activities on a regular basis in mathematics. Opportunities to write longer pieces of work, based on their own imagination, are also limited. This restricts the chance for the more-able pupils, in particular, to shine.
p.2
Main findings
Teaching has improved because of the headteacher’s persistent focus on providing good quality teaching for pupils. She is uncompromising about her high expectations for the team. The headteacher checks lessons regularly and gives teachers helpful guidance about how to improve their teaching. There is less emphasis on the quality of learning to give teachers specific advice on what they could do to lift and enrich pupils’ learning even more.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The headteacher welcomes and values the fresh ‘eye’ that external support brings to her work in this small school. She has sought training and advice, when necessary, from beyond the school. This has contributed to improvements in teaching and pupils’ progress and supported the headteacher’s drive and ambition to move the school to good.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hampshire.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion