Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Apr 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ian Hodgkinson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ian Hodgkinson

  • Postcode verified

    HR2 7NG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−29Mixedmore positive than 11% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivestrengthspositivestronglyaccurateimprovingclearly
Criticismnot alwaysweaknessespoorlackinconsistenciesgapsdelaysnot precise

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings215w0
  • Leadership528w−29

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
743
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 34, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 28%Leadership 69%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Mr John Sheppard Principal The Hereford Academy Marlbrook Road Redhill Hereford HR2 7NG

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of The Hereford Academy

Following my visit to your school on 18 March 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of The Hereford Academy

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in November 2013.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with the principal, the Chair and other representatives of the Governing Body, and a representative of the sponsor. The sponsor’s statement of action and the school’s action plans were evaluated.

p.1

Context

Since the inspection, a change of sponsorship structure has been agreed with the Department for Education, allowing the Diocese of Hereford Board of Education to administer the academy as part of a new multi-academy trust. A new Chair of the Governing Body has been elected. The head of mathematics has stepped down and the head of science is now leading the mathematics department on an interim basis. Four mathematics teachers have left the school. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0121 679 9166 Direct email :helen.johnson@serco.com

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The principal has ensured that the academy is well focused on tackling the key weaknesses which led it to be placed in special measures. Self-evaluation of the academy’s performance is honest and accurate. This has led to a school action plan, embedded within the statement of action, which addresses head-on the main issues identified in the inspection report, especially around improving teaching quality, leadership and standards in English and mathematics. The plan rightly goes further in setting out, as priorities, actions to raise the achievement of post-16 students and to overcome the poor literacy standards which hold back standards across the academy. Targets for improvement are, however, not always sufficiently precise and measurable through the plan, especially on closing gaps for students eligible for the pupil premium and for whole-school literacy programmes. The academy has continued to build on its strengths, particularly in promoting the positive ethos which

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

has led to significant improvements in behaviour and attendance. It has also continued to engage strongly with its community with initiatives aimed at overcoming barriers to learning for those experiencing socio-economic disadvantage.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The sponsor has taken an active role in strengthening academy leadership, including through promoting more effective governance. The governing body, under new chairmanship, has developed its structures and skills to ask questions of leaders about the impact of improvement actions. Governing body minutes now set out more clearly than in the past this higher degree of challenge and recommendations for further action. Monthly meetings of the governors’ action group allow regular evaluation of the academy’s progress against the action plan. Some delays have occurred to the implementation of the review of governance and the pupil premium specified in the inspection report, because new sponsorship and governance arrangements have been under negotiation with the Department for Education. The review of governance has, however, now been commissioned and papers submitted to reviewers for scrutiny. The sponsor has also commissioned a review of leadership

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

to ensure that, across the academy, leadership roles and structures are efficient and effective. The effectiveness of leadership at all levels has been constrained by a lack of reliable information about student progress across the academy. Firm actions are now in place to gather progress data more regularly and present this more transparently, but leaders recognise that inconsistencies and inaccuracies remain at present.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The academy has developed a network of links with external agencies and other schools to support improvement and to draw on best practice. Detailed consideration has been given to the benefits that each partnership can bring to specific aspects of the academy’s work, but the allocation of resources and expected commitment from each partner are not always precisely defined. Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The sponsor’s statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The academy’s action plan is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Having considered all the evidence, I recommend that the academy may appoint NQTs, but not in the English and mathematics departments.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, the Diocese of Hereford, the Academies Advisers Unit, and the Education Funding Agency. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion