Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Mar 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Brian Padgett

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Brian Padgett

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+54Positivemore positive than 53% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingstronggood progresseffectivecaringproudkeenpositive
Criticismrequires improvementbelowconcern

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
798
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566855 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: gail.hill@cfbt.com

p.1

Mrs Val Kermode Headteacher Castleway Primary School Castleway North Moreton Wirral Merseyside CH46 1RN

p.1

Wirral

Following my visit to your school on 10 March 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Wirral

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in December 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Wirral

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, senior staff, a group of more- able pupils, members of the Governing Body including the Chair of Governors, and a representative of the local authority. The school action plan was evaluated and documentation provided by the school was examined. Accompanied by the headteacher, the inspector visited each class briefly.

p.1

Main findings

The school and local authority have acted with urgency since the section 5 inspection. An action plan was quickly in place, ready for the beginning of the spring term. Information on Ofsted’s ‘Getting to Good’ seminars was actively sought.

p.1

Main findings

The headteacher is leading the improvement work well. She has the full confidence of governors and of staff. Her calm, caring and professional approach is appreciated at all levels, not least by pupils. Pupils are proud of their school. They displayed good attitudes to work: they are keen to do well and take a close interest in their surroundings, in its ecology, for instance.

p.1

Main findings

The whole staff is keen to improve. Key post holders were quick to put forward their ideas for further development. Pupils’ core skills are weakest in writing and it is in this aspect where a considerable effort is being made. The range of work is wide, encompassing handwriting and grammar as well as composition. Strong links are made between writing and all other aspects of literacy, including speaking and listening and an appreciation of good children’s literature. Early results are impressive, especially in Year 5, where the subject leader teaches. Although pupils’ achievement in mathematics was not a concern, this subject is also being developed to improve pupils’ levels of understanding of number and problem solving, for example.

p.2

Main findings

The school’s forward projections for pupils’ attainment and progress in 2014 and 2015 are positive; pupils are making good progress in the current Years 5 and 6 and they are expected to do well, including the more-able pupils. However, smaller classes of widely different abilities are characteristic of the rest of the school. The school faces a considerable challenge in raising standards to the national expectations in some years. This can be seen in the current Year 2, where the proportion of pupils likely to reach Level 2 in English, the national expectation, is currently below average. The achievement of boys is a particular concern.

p.2

Main findings

Robust action is being taken to improve teaching where it currently requires improvement. The local authority’s support is instrumental here, helping to provide intensive support for short, fixed period of time. No one is in any doubt of what is required or of the consequences of not meeting the required standards.

p.2

Main findings

The good features of governance noted in the section 5 inspection, such as its leadership and skill base, continue to make their impact on improvement. The Governing Body is very determined to see the school judged ‘good’. It has been further strengthened and is increasingly involved in the daily life of the school.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The local authority is providing very good support and challenge to help the school improve. It acted quickly. It immediately raised the school’s risk level to enable access to increased support. It conducted a review of teaching, confirmed where improvement was required and put in place intensive support from consultants for a fixed period, mentioned above. A link with an outstanding school in a similar catchment is in place. It is also improving the fabric of the building. The authority requires the school to report on progress at regular intervals. Officers have confidence in the school’s capacity to move to ‘good’.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children's Services for Wirral and as below. Yours sincerely

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion