Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Joan Hewitt
- Postcode verified
WN8 9TG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment20
“Ensure teachers are consistently checking that pupils are following up on marking” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 935
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566868 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: pnuttie@cfbt.com
p.1
Mrs Louise Tempest Headteacher Hayfield Lane Primary School Hayfield Lane Auckley Doncaster South Yorkshire DN9 3NB
p.1
School, Doncaster
Following my visit to your school on 10 March 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School, Doncaster
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School, Doncaster
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
School, Doncaster
Tweak the school’s action plan to make it clear what success will look like at monitoring points. Ensure teachers are consistently checking that pupils are following up on marking Check that pupils’ comments on their work are about what they have learned rather than their enjoyment of the task. Make sure all pupils can move from task to task without losing focus. Ensure teaching assistants’ work is consistent in supporting learning and make sure they do not give pupils too much help.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I met with you and the deputy headteacher, two members of the Governing Body, a representative of the local authority and the headteacher of the partner school to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the school’s improvement and action plans. I also toured the school with you and visited lessons. I looked at pupils’ work and their behaviour at lunchtime.
p.1
Main findings
The headteacher and deputy headteacher, supported efficiently by other leaders and governors, have got off to a brisk start in securing improvements. Much of this early work has rightly been focussed on improving teaching. Where teachers need support, leaders have put in place effective personal improvement plans. This includes regular lesson visits by senior staff who offer helpful tips about how teachers can improve their practice. Most teachers have responded well and consequently teaching is continuing to improve. Leaders are equally robust where teaching is not improving rapidly enough.
p.2
Main findings
Teachers are making better use of resources to make sure less able pupils understand their work more securely. For example, less able pupils in Year 5 used a counting block system to help them calculate percentages confidently. Pupils are recording more work in mathematics and this is making it easier for teachers and leaders to judge how well pupils have understood the work. Pupils and teachers are enjoying a new approach to writing and this is giving pupils more opportunities to write at length
p.2
Main findings
Pupils are now taking a more active part in commenting on what they have learned and identifying what they need to do next to improve their work. This is being done regularly, particularly in mathematics. However, the quality of the comments are sometimes about how much they have enjoyed their work rather than what they have learned. Teachers are making an effort to ensure pupils get time to follow up on marking in their books but this is not consistent across the school.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders have put in place training for teachers to help them manage pupils’ behaviour, particularly of those pupils who have specific difficulties. Consequently, the number of incidents of poor behaviour has reduced. Behaviour in the classrooms continues to be calm and orderly although there are occasions when a few pupils find it difficult to move from task to task without losing concentration.
p.2
Main findings
Teaching assistants generally contribute well to supporting pupils’ learning by asking questions and keeping pupils’ focused on their work. They are also working well in teaching small groups of pupils who are stuck with specific ideas or concepts. However, occasionally teaching assistants let pupils off the hook too easily by giving them the answer to teachers’ questions.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders’ planning is thorough and identifies the right priorities. It is clear who is responsible for putting actions in place and how the success of those actions will be measured. There are also times identified to check on the progress but it is not always clear what leaders and governors expect to see when they are making interim checks.
p.2
Main findings
Governors continue to keep a close eye on the progress the school is making and they visit the school regularly to make sure they have first-hand information. They check thoroughly on how well disadvantaged pupils are doing. They attend events at the school and they are regularly available for parents at the beginning and end of the school day. However, there are still a few families who do not engage well with the school and governors are seeking to improve this. Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The local authority has brokered effective support from a partner school which the headteacher has particularly valued. The partner school has been helpful in working out ways to tailor support for individual teachers. This support is appropriate and remains and important part of improving the school.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Doncaster and as below.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion