Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Appletree Treatment Centre Limited in Westmorland and Furness

Inspected 4 Feb 2014 · published 28 Mar 2014 · URN SC032838

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Gillian Walters

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    4 Feb 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Gillian Walters

  • URN verified

    SC032838

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+6Mostly positivemore positive than 36% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progresssuccessfullyimprovedpositivelypositiverobusteffectivesafe
Criticisminadequateconcernsconcerningfailednot metdeclined

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1003w+10
  • What needs to improve92w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,093
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 50
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 84%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 8%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC032838 Inspection date 04/02/2014 Inspector Gillian Walters Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Residential special school (>295 days/year)

p.1

Date of last inspection 18/09/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

This is a privately owned residential special school, which is also registered as a children’s home. It provides a service to eight children, between the ages of six and 12 years, who experience emotional or behavioural difficulties.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .

p.3

Progress

At the last full inspection on 18 September 2013 this home was judged as good. There were two requirements and two recommendations made to promote improvement in the service. A further visit to the home on 13 November 2013 resulted in two more required improvements being identified. These have all been suitably addressed by the provider and further action taken to improve the quality of the service provided.

p.3

Progress

The home has very recently appointed a new manager to lead the home following the planned departure of the home's Registered Manager on maternity leave. Ofsted were advised of this recent appointment and the manager is currently in the process of making application to become the home’s Registered Manager. The new manager has benefited from an extended induction period, working alongside the Registered Manager prior to her departure. This has enabled her to successfully establish positive relationships with both children and the staff team and familiarise herself with the home's operation. The manager commented, 'my induction has been second to none.' The home's published children's guide has been revised to ensure that children have good access to information about the home's complaints procedure should they wish to raise any concerns. The home has also revised its statement of purpose to appropriately reflect arrangements for children who may go missing and the

p.3

Progress

complaints process. It is in the process of further updating this document to reflect recent changes in staffing arrangements.

p.4

Progress

The home has revised and updated a number of its policies and procedures, including those relating to missing children and behaviour management to reflect recent legislative changes. Risk assessment and behaviour management plans have been reviewed and revised, identifying and suitably addressing children's specific needs. This ensures that children's needs are fully understood by staff and plans to support them are now robust.

p.4

Progress

Monitoring within the home is proving effective with information being successfully evaluated, identifying trends and patterns that inform improved strategies for managing individual children's behaviours. This has positively enabled staff to target difficult times of the day for individual children. A clear result of the progress made can be identified in the reduction of physical interventions for some children.

p.4

Progress

Improved arrangements are in place to ensure that children receive a health check immediately following any incident of physical intervention. This ensures that any concerns are picked up without delay and appropriately acted upon, including notification to Ofsted where this is required. Additionally, the provider has revised records in relation to the use of disciplinary measures. This ensures that there is sufficient opportunity to record full and comprehensive reflection from both children and staff following any event, enabling both staff and children to learn from events that occur. Formal staff supervision arrangements also routinely identify and address occasions when staff have been involved in physical intervention; this allows the manager to further evaluate and scrutinise practice to ensure it is proportionate and reasonable.

p.4

Progress

The staff benefit from their attendance at regular staff team meetings. This forum provides them with regular opportunities for peer support and time to discuss children's individual progress. The home values the importance of staff development and encourages staff to participate in a range of training to ensure that their knowledge and skills are continuously developed. Individual needs are usually identified through the process of supervision and appraisal. In addressing an identified shortfall, all staff members have recently participated in an event arranged to increase their awareness and understanding of safe practice in relation to supervising contact between children and their families.

p.4

Progress

Children report that they feel happy and safe in this home. They enjoy living in an environment that is homely and promotes emotional warmth. The staff demonstrate creativity in developing resources within the home to enable children to appropriately express their thoughts and feelings, often avoiding less desirable behaviours. Children also engage positively with regular children's meetings where they contribute their ideas and wishes, influencing some of the decisions concerning their day-to-day living arrangements. A good example of this was the opportunity given to children to contribute their views concerning the potential appointment of new staff. Children understand that they can voice their preferences and that their views will be taken into account.

p.4

Progress

The home has made progress in eliciting and documenting the views of placing authorities to gauge the level of satisfaction with the service provided. However, the home's external monitoring arrangements fall short in ensuring that the views of children, staff and families are consistently sought. This means that independent monitoring is not routinely taking account of such views on children's safety and well-being that would assist in evaluating and determining the standard of care provided within this home.

p.5

Statutory Requirements

This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.

p.5

Reg. Requirement Due date

(2001) ensure that the person carrying out the visit shall interview, with their consent and in private, such of the children accommodated there, their parents, relatives and persons working at the home as appears necessary in order to form an opinion of the standard of care provided in the home. (Regulation 33(4)(a)) 24/03/2014

p.5

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.6

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion