Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

The Ridge Primary School

Inspected 28 Feb 2014 · published 25 Mar 2014 · URN 103805

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Feb 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Sajid Gulzar, Steven Cartlidge

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    DY8 3NF

  • Name on report verified

    The Ridge Primary School

  • URN verified

    103805

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+62Positivemore positive than 33% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandinggood progressvery welleffectivelyeffectiveclearexemplaryhighly effective
Criticisminadequateweaknessesrequires improvementnot yetseriousnot outstandingstruggleabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1448w+80
  • Leadership836w+39
  • What needs to improve57w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,267
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 48
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 47%Leadership 27%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

The Ridge Primary School Gregory Road, Wollaston, Stourbridge, DY8 3NF

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Pupils’ achievement is good because pupils join the school with skills that are broadly typical for their age and leave with attainment that is above average.  The headteacher, senior team and governing body take a strong lead in driving improvement. Rigorous checks on teaching, with good training and support where it is needed, maintain the quality of classroom practice and improve achievement.  The good teaching of letters and the sounds they make (phonics) means that pupils quickly develop good reading skills from an early age.  Teaching is good with some outstanding. Staff use questions well, both to assess what pupils know and to encourage them to work things out for themselves.  Pupils’ behaviour is good, both in lessons and around the school. Pupils are polite and welcoming.  The spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of the pupils is at the centre of the school’s work.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 Some teachers’ comments, when marking books, do not give pupils enough guidance on how to improve their work.  Occasionally, work is not set at the right level of difficulty for pupils, making it too easy or too hard for them to complete.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed parts of 18 lessons, two of which were observed jointly with members of the senior leadership team. Inspectors listened to several pupils read and looked at samples of their recent work.  Meetings were held with the headteacher, teachers and members of the governing body. The lead inspector had a discussion with a representative from the local authority. Discussions also took place with mixed-ability groups of pupils.  Inspectors scrutinised a variety of school documents, including: the school’s self-evaluation; the school development plan; behaviour records; and documents relating to the work of the governing body and the management of teachers’ performance.  The views of the 64 parents who responded to the online questionnaire, Parent View, were taken into account, together with an email from a parent. Inspectors also considered the views expressed in 20 questionnaires returned by school staff.

p.2

Inspection team

Steven Cartlidge, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Sajid Gulzar Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 The school is smaller than the average-sized primary school.  Most pupils are White British. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds is below average and there are no pupils who speak English as an additional language.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported through school action is below average. The proportion of pupils supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is above average.  A below-average proportion of pupils are eligible for the pupil premium. This is extra funding from the government for pupils in local authority care and those known to be eligible for free school meals.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards for primary schools, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.  A new deputy headteacher has been appointed since the previous inspection.

p.3

Information about this school

 A breakfast club and after-school club are provided by the school.  A privately run playgroup on site is inspected separately.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Increase the proportion of teaching that is outstanding by making sure that:  teachers’ written comments in pupils’ books shows pupils what they need to do to improve their work  work is set at the right level of difficulty for pupils so that it is not too easy or too hard for them to complete.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Children start in Reception with skills typical of those expected for their age. They make rapid progress and reach a good level of development, so that they are well prepared for their move to Key Stage 1 at the end of the Reception Year. There is an especially good focus on the effective teaching of early reading and writing skills. The impact of this is evident in pupils’ good performance in the Year 1 screening check in phonics (letters and the sounds they make).

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Since the previous inspection, standards have remained above average in Key Stages 1 and 2, with just one dip three years ago in Key Stage 2. In 2013, pupils were two terms ahead of pupils nationally at the end of Year 2. Pupils in Year 6 last year left the school around six months ahead of pupils nationally.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Progress in Years 1 to 6 is good for all groups, including pupils of different abilities. Senior leaders have improved the use of assessment information to track the progress made by individuals and groups. This has helped to identify which pupils need support and, in turn, has improved the overall rate of progress made. The school’s assessments of how well pupils are progressing indicates that pupils are on track to achieve better results in 2014 than in previous years.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 In recent years, standards in mathematics have not been as high as those in other areas. The school has tackled this by appointing a deputy headteacher who is also a specialist mathematics teacher. Recent school information on progress in mathematics, and confirmed from the work in pupils’ books, suggests a much stronger picture, with the vast majority of pupils now achieving well in this subject.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils are well motivated and keen to achieve well. This contributes to their good progress. For example, in a Year 6 mathematics lesson, pupils displayed great enthusiasm sharing with their classmates their mathematical skills in interpreting ratio and proportion.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs grow in confidence and make good progress. They benefit from well-targeted additional help in lessons, often supported individually by teaching assistants.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The school is using its pupil premium funding to provide extra staffing, one-to-one tuition and additional educational resources for eligible pupils. In 2012, these pupils were two terms behind their classmates in English and mathematics at the end of Year 6. The gap widened in 2013; it was the equivalent of around three terms in reading, four terms in writing and nearly five terms in mathematics. This reflected the special educational needs of some of the eligible pupils last year.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The situation was thoroughly investigated by the senior leadership team and well-directed measures were put in place to accelerate pupils’ progress. Current information indicates that the small number of pupils supported by the pupil premium this year are making better than expected progress and narrowing the gap with their classmates.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching is typically good or better, borne out by pupils’ good progress and achievement.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 In the Early Years Foundation Stage, effective use is made of both inside and outside areas to promote good learning. Children make good or better progress in their ability to communicate and use language skills and begin identifying and writing letters and practising the sounds they make (phonics). During the inspection children had the chance to conduct an experiment using lemonade and raisins, which involved them working together in teams. The children were highly enthusiastic, and the activity contributed well to their developing language and communication skills.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Throughout the school, teachers’ subject knowledge is good. They set tasks for pupils that motivate them to work hard and to succeed. In a history lesson in Year 5, for example, pupils were set the task of investigating how the film industry evolved in the early 20th Century. The pupils gradually added increasingly complex details to their investigations and showed a clear understanding of how to develop their work to reach the highest level.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 In a Year 1 English lesson on finding out and recording information from a text, pupils made good progress in their understanding because the teacher used questions very well to prompt them to think of alternative ways of recognising how information can be recorded.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers and teaching assistants work together effectively. The help provided by teaching assistants is targeted well of individual pupils’ specific learning needs. This means that pupils of all abilities, including the most able, and disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs, make consistently good progress.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers tell pupils how well they are doing but the quality of written feedback, in the form of marking, varies. Where marking is most effective, teachers’ written comments show pupils what they need to do to improve their work, and this contributes to the progress that pupils make. Older pupils, in particular, value this kind of feedback. However, this approach is not yet consistent across the school.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Occasionally, pupils’ work is not adapted sufficiently to meet their different abilities. On these rare occasions, the work set is too easy for some pupils and too hard for others.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Homework builds well on what pupils learn in class. Pupils complete homework to a good standard and this prepares them well for tackling work in the following lesson.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils settle quickly in lessons. They are eager to learn and are always willing to have a go. For example, in an English lesson, Year 5 pupils were able to develop their personal writing skills to a very high standard by sharing their ideas and working in groups, following exactly the instructions from their teacher and teaching assistant.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Exemplary behaviour was seen by inspectors at break and lunchtimes. Pupils were keen to point out that this was typical behaviour.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils show great pride in their school and treat their environment, their teachers and their classmates with respect and courtesy. Pupils’ work is neatly presented, and they also take pride in their school uniform.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 The school works effectively to maintain good or better behaviour, and there are clear procedures to support pupils who find this difficult. Instances of misbehaviour are few, and are quickly resolved so that the learning of others is not disrupted.  The school’s work to keep pupils safe and secure is good. Governors rigorously check safeguarding practice and, as a result, safeguarding procedures meet current legal requirements.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils say they feel safe in school and their parents strongly agree with that view. Pupils say that there is almost no bullying and that they are very well supported on the rare occasions it occurs. They are well informed about different forms of bullying and other aspects of safety, including the importance of keeping safe when using the internet.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Attendance, over the last three years, has been above average. Leaders have ensured good attendance by focusing work with those families who struggle to get their children to school, making clear to them the effect absence has on their children’s progress and attainment.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Behaviour and safety are not outstanding because there are occasions when not all pupils apply themselves fully to their work.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The headteacher provides very determined leadership and offers teachers and parents a clearly articulated vision for an even better school.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The school’s self-evaluation is based on an accurate analysis of what works well and what is needed to raise attainment even higher. The headteacher’s rigorous analysis of pupils’ progress and her accurate evaluation of the school’s work provide all teachers and the governing body with a clear understanding of the school’s performance, including in the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Improvement planning is sharply focused on identified weaknesses seen, for example, in the successful action recently taken to raise attainment in mathematics. The school’s track record, reflected in pupils’ good achievement, shows its capacity for continued improvement.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Subject leaders and other staff with leadership responsibilities are well supported so they can carry out their roles effectively.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The leadership of teaching is good and the school places a high priority on improving teaching through high-quality training. Teachers’ performance is checked and information is used from lesson observations and from information about pupils’ progress to set teachers’ targets for improvement. The headteacher and deputy headteacher are holding teachers rigorously to account, and the help they have given teachers is accelerating the rate of learning. There is a clear understanding that decisions about pay increases will be based on the impact of teaching on pupils’ progress.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 School leaders make sure that different groups of pupils have an equal chance to succeed, and they tackle effectively any instances of discrimination. Pupil premium funding is used effectively. It has been used to help to develop the role of the teaching assistants. Pupils identified as in need of additional help, including those supported by pupil premium funding and disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs, are well supported. These pupils are now making similarly good or better progress to that of their classmates.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Teachers use a broad range of topics to make learning stimulating and exciting across different subjects, and pupils say they find the work they are set interesting. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is very effectively promoted by a broad range of arts, drama, music, science and sports activities, as well as by visits and visitors.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The school has used the new primary school sports funding to employ a physical education teacher for one day per week to coach staff and work with pupils. It is too early to evaluate the impact of this initiative on developing healthy lifestyles and better physical well-being for pupils.

p.7

The leadership and management are good

 The local authority has worked well with senior leaders to provide well-targeted support for the school to improve.

p.7

The leadership and management are good

 The Parent View responses indicate that parents have a very positive view of the school, with a very large majority of those who responded saying they would recommend the school to another parent.

p.7

The leadership and management are good

 The governance of the school:  The governing body is well informed. It challenges school leaders and holds them to account for pupils’ achievement. It compares the school’s performance with that of schools nationally. Governors strongly support the school and its leaders. They share the headteacher’s vision for the school’s further improvement. They visit the school regularly during the day and talk to both teachers and pupils about their work. This gives them a clear insight into the quality of teaching and its impact on pupils’ learning. The governing body oversees the management of finance and resources expertly. Governors check carefully, for example, that the pupil premium funding is having the impact it should in improving the achievement of eligible pupils. Explanation and action from school leaders and managers are called for when initiatives do not show the improvement expected. Governors maintain oversight of the

p.7

The leadership and management are good

performance of staff and ensure that salary increases are justified by pupils’ good progress and achievement.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 103805 Local authority Dudley Inspection number 431495

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Primary School category Maintained Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 206 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Christopher Wrigley Headteacher Deborah Hudson Date of previous school inspection 10 July 2009 Telephone number 01384 818800 Fax number 01384 818801 Email address info@ridge.dudley.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion