Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Bristol City Council in Bristol

Inspected 28 Jan 2014 · published 25 Mar 2014 · URN SC034211

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Peter Harrell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    28 Jan 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Peter Harrell

  • URN verified

    SC034211

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+11Mostly positivemore positive than 39% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progresshigh qualitypositivepositivelyrespectfulnurturingenthusiasticindependent
Criticisminadequatefailednot metdeclined

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings587w+11
  • What needs to improve78w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
664
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 50
Average sentence
25 words
Next steps
1
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 77%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC034211 Inspection date 28/01/2014 Inspector Peter Harrell Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 07/11/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

This home is one of a number of children's homes operated by a city council. It provides care and accommodation for up to five young people who have emotional and/or behaviour difficulties. This home is described as an 'admissions unit' where the intention is to move young people on to more suitable care and accommodation, such as a return to their parental home, identified foster placement, preparation for independent living, or a long-term children's home.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .

p.3

Progress

At the last inspection the home was judged to be good overall with two requirements and two recommendations for improvement being made.

p.3

Progress

At this inspection, the Registered Manager and staff team demonstrate a continued commitment to improving the quality of care and achieving positive outcomes for young people. Young people progress well. All the requirements and recommendations made at the previous inspection have been met. There is one recommendation resulting from this interim inspection.

p.3

Progress

Young people demonstrate that they are provided with a range of choices and actively participate and feedback their views and feelings to their key workers; the Registered Manager ensures that culturally appropriate food is on the menu at the home and this is chosen by young people and discussed in individual keywork sessions and residents meetings. There has been a dramatic reduction in incidents of young people going missing or absent without authority. The duration in which young people are absent has also reduced. Additionally, there is clearer evidence of several discussions taking place with young people when these incidents occur.

p.3

Progress

However, the protocol document between the service, as a local authority children's home, and the police has still not been updated and at the time of the inspection the Registered Manager was referring to a relatively old document. It is therefore recommended that this is updated, in order to reflect recent legislative and practice developments which are in place to safeguard the welfare and minimise the vulnerability of missing young people.

p.4

Progress

Young people speak positively about the care they receive and say they can raise issues with members of staff. The rapport between managers, staff and young people is one which is both respectful and nurturing. Staff are enthusiastic about their care of young people and there is a commitment to provide a high quality service. Staff support the educational needs of young people and support young people in several aspects of their lives which helps promote their future independence.

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.4

Recommendations

 ensure that if a child is absent from the home and their whereabouts is not known, the home's procedures are compatible with and have regard to current Runaway and Missing from Home and Care (RMFHC) protocols and procedures maintained and managed by the police or by the local authority for the area where the home is located (NMS 5.6).

p.4

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.5

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion