Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Crossways Junior School

Inspected 28 Feb 2014 · published 21 Mar 2014 · URN 109040

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Matthew Cottrell (lead), Jennifer Cutler

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Feb 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Jennifer Cutler, Matthew Cottrell

  • Postcode verified

    BS35 2HQ

  • Name on report verified

    Crossways Junior School

  • URN verified

    109040

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+50Positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingstrongstrengthsexcellenteffectiveimprovedvery wellextremely
Criticismnot alwaysinadequateweaknessesnot outstandingnot yetrequires improvementat riskdisrupt

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1259w+60
  • Leadership831w+36
  • What needs to improve70w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,081
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 42%Leadership 28%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

Crossways Junior School Knapp Road, Thornbury, Bristol, BS35 2HQ

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Pupils make good progress and achieve well. Pupils’ achievements in mathematics and reading are particular strengths throughout the school.  Pupils achieve well because teaching is typically good and some is outstanding.  The school has an accurate view of its strengths and areas for improvement resulting in an effective school development plan used to identify key areas for further work.  The quality of marking was an area for improvement from the school’s previous inspection. Marking has improved and is now a strength of the school.  The rich and diverse range of subjects makes a significant contribution toward developing pupils’ skills, knowledge and understanding.  The focus on pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is strong and as a result pupils behave well and typically show good attitudes toward their work.  The vision and drive of the headteacher, senior

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

leaders and governors to further improve the quality of teaching and pupils’ learning are shared by all staff.  Governance is good because the recently formed federation’s governing body has a secure grasp of the school’s strengths and weaknesses and holds it accountable for pupils’ achievement.  Pupils say that they feel very safe in school. They are caring and respectful toward each other.  Parents and carers have a very positive view of the school and speak highly of its work.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because:

 Pupils do not achieve as well in writing as they do in mathematics and reading.  Teachers do not always explain tasks clearly enough. When this happens, time is lost because pupils do not know what to do.  Pupils are not always given extra work when they complete a task. When this happens, some pupils lose concentration and they begin to disturb the learning of other pupils.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed 16 lessons or parts of lessons taught by nine teachers. Five of these were joint observations with the headteacher. They also observed the teaching of groups where individual support was provided in class. In addition, inspectors heard pupils read as well as examining pupils’ work and discussing it with them. Inspectors also visited the breakfast club.  A wide range of school documentation was analysed and evaluated, including that relating to safeguarding, progress information, staff training, school improvement plans, governing body minutes and monitoring records.  Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher and staff as well as the Chair of the Governing Body and three other members. A conversation was held with a representative of the local authority.  The 80 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, were considered as well as the 22 questionnaires returned by staff. Inspectors also spoke to parents and carers before the start

p.2

Information about this inspection

of school and took account of pupils’ behaviour during playtimes and in the dining hall.

p.2

Inspection team

Matthew Cottrell, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Jennifer Cutler Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 Crossways Junior School is a smaller-than-average size junior school.  The school federated with Crossways Infant School in September 2012.  The school meets the current government floor standards which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics by the end of Key Stage 2.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported through school action is lower than the national average. The proportion supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is lower than the national average.  The number of pupils known to be eligible for additional funding through the pupil premium is well below the national average. This funding is available for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, those from a forces family and those looked after by the local authority. There are no looked-after children at the school.

p.3

Information about this school

 The percentage of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds and those learning English as an additional language is below average.  The school has an after-school club to support parents and carers with child care. This club is not managed by the school or governing body and so was not included in this inspection.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve pupils’ writing by providing more opportunities for them to write at length across the range of subjects and on a variety of themes and topics.  Ensure that pupils make even better progress in their learning by:  making sure that teachers take time to clearly explain tasks before they set pupils to work  ensuring that pupils know what to do next when they finish an activity.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils enter the school in most years with above average standards in reading, writing and mathematics.  The achievement of all groups of pupils, including the more able, is good and improving. This is because senior leaders rigorously monitor the quality of teaching to ensure that it is at least good. They have introduced learning targets for pupils and have focused upon improving the quality of teachers’ marking.  When the school was last inspected, mathematics was the weakest area of school performance. Pupils now achieve consistently better in mathematics. Mathematics and reading are now strengths of the school. Work to improve writing so that it is equally as good is beginning to have an impact.  By the end of Year 6, overall attainment is significantly above average. In 2013, the proportion of pupils attaining the expected level in mathematics and reading was significantly above average while

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

attainment in writing was broadly in line with the average.  In 2013, the proportion of pupils attaining higher than expected levels in reading and mathematics was significantly above average while in writing it was broadly in line with the average.  In the past some pupils eligible for support through the pupil premium have not reached similar levels of attainment to other pupils. In 2013 these Year 6 pupils were two terms behind their classmates in reading, three terms behind them in writing and five terms behind them in mathematics. Over the last year the school has targeted all pupils eligible for the pupil premium to ensure that the pace of their learning speeds up. This has been successful and as a result pupils receive the support that they need so that the gap between their performance and that of their peers in reading, writing and mathematics has become less and is narrowing quickly.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching is good throughout the school and some is outstanding. An example of this was seen in a lesson where pupils were being taught how to use a protractor to measure angles. Learning and progress were outstanding because of the high expectations of the teacher and because of the pupils’ excellent attitudes toward their learning.  Teaching is not yet outstanding. Teachers plan a range of different tasks and activities for different ability groups. However, they do not always take time to clearly explain tasks before they set pupils to work and to ensure that pupils know what to do next when they finish an activity. When this happens, some pupils lose concentration. They become unsettled and they begin to disrupt the learning of others as well as not making greater progress themselves.  Teachers are enthusiastic about learning and this is communicated to pupils who enjoy the tasks that their teachers have set for them to do. The work that pupils are given challenges their thinking,

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

including that of the more able.  Teaching assistants are deployed effectively in the classroom and they provide good support for pupils, working closely with class teachers to ensure a consistent approach.  Relationships in the classroom are very strong. This is because the school has worked hard to ensure that the school is a place where everyone works together to succeed.  The school’s rich range of subjects is taught well and is closely linked to pupils’ skills and interests. Lessons motivate pupils well and make an excellent contribution to their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. For example, as part of a Year 5 topic called ‘Journeys and Judgements’ pupils were encouraged to adopt different perspectives when considering the actions of Jesus when he removed the moneylenders from the temple.  The school has worked hard to improve the quality of teachers’ marking and as a result it has

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

significantly improved since the previous inspection. Marking is now consistent across the school. It identifies strengths in pupils’ work and areas that need improving. Pupils are given time to respond to their teacher’s comments and they say that marking helps them to learn.

p.4

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils enjoy school and develop very well as articulate, courteous and considerate young people, well aware of how to lead safe and healthy lives.  Behaviour is not yet outstanding because when teachers do not clearly explain tasks or tell pupils what to do next pupils become unsettled and as a result learning suffers.  Pupils’ ability to work cooperatively is a strength of the school. Pupils support one another extremely well by helping each other with their work, taking turns and giving and receiving positive criticism.  Attendance is above average and reflects pupils’ evident enjoyment of school. They speak enthusiastically about what they learn and have good attitudes towards their work.  The school’s work to keep pupils safe and secure is good. Pupils say that they feel very safe. This is because the school has clear policies and procedures that pupils understand well. For example,

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

pupils are taught how to stay safe when using computers online.  Pupils are clear about what constitutes bullying and the various forms in which it can take place such as verbal, mental, physical and cyber bullying. They say that bullying occurs very rarely in school and that when it does they know that adults will quickly help to resolve the matter. School records confirm this view.  Behaviour in and around the school is good. The school’s documentation shows that no serious incidents have occurred in recent years and there have been no exclusions in the previous year.

p.5

The leadership and management are good

 The headteacher has been instrumental in shaping a new leadership team for the school. He is highly ambitious for the school and is well supported by the newly appointed deputy headteacher, senior leaders and governors.  Staff morale is extremely high. Staff share the headteacher’s commitment to ensuring that pupils achieve well and they form a strong team. As a result, the capacity for the school to make further improvements is strong.  School leaders have a good understanding of the strengths of the school and what needs to be improved further. Targets for improvement are clear and the impact of school development work is measured against specific and measurable criteria. For example, the recent focus on writing has meant that the standard of written work has begun to improve.  The school makes effective use of detailed information about the progress of pupils. The headteacher has a good understanding of how individual pupils and groups of pupils make progress.

p.5

The leadership and management are good

This has led to recent improvements in the progress and achievement of all groups, for example, those eligible for the pupil premium.  The management of teaching is good. The headteacher and senior leaders have a robust system of checking on the quality of teaching and holding teachers to account for their performance. Teachers are given targets that are both linked to pupils’ progress and reflect areas for school improvement.  The primary school sports funding is being used to effectively build upon the high quality and breadth of physical education and sports provision. Specialist sports coaches have been employed to improve pupils’ expertise in different sporting activities. The participation in sporting activities across the school is high.  Use of additional funds to support the progress of pupils who are at risk of not doing so well as others, the pupil premium, is carefully monitored by leaders and the governing body. Funding is

p.5

The leadership and management are good

used in a variety of ways, including for the provision of extra adult support, improved resources and personalised tuition. This is helping these pupils to catch up with their peers where any gaps exist.  The school has a strong partnership with parents and carers and it is clear that the work of the school is highly regarded. This was evident from discussions with parents and carers and from Ofsted’s Parent View survey. Almost all parents and carers would recommend the school to others.  The local authority, recognising the school’s continuing level of effectiveness, provides limited support on an ‘as needed’ basis.  The governance of the school:  The current governing body was formed from two separate governing bodies in September 2012 as a result of the federation of Crossways Infant School and Crossways Junior School. Governors have been highly successful in their work to put in place the structures required for the new federation

p.5

The leadership and management are good

and have a clear understanding of their strategic role in leading school improvement. Governors are committed and ambitious for the school. They actively contribute to the school’s monitoring and evaluation programme through regular visits and challenging questioning. They are fully aware of the quality of teaching in the school and how the performance of teachers is being managed to help improve teaching further. Governors provide both support and challenge for the headteacher and ensure that he is held to account for pupils’ progress and how the school compares to others. For example, they ensure that there is a clear link between the quality of teaching and pupils’ progress and the way in which teachers move along the pay scales. The governing body ensures that the school makes effective use of additional funding such as the pupil premium and primary school sports funding and is aware of its impact. Governors meet all their statutory responsibilities including

p.6

The leadership and management are good

national requirements for safeguarding pupils.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 109040 Local authority South Gloucestershire Inspection number 431480

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Junior School category Maintained Age range of pupils 7–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 206 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Steve Forecast Headteacher Mark Toogood Date of previous school inspection 7–8 July 2009 Telephone number 01454 866566 Fax number 01454 866565 Email address juniorschool@crossways.org.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion