Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by London Borough of Barnet in Barnet
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
23 Jan 2014
- Inspectors verified
Seka Graovac
- URN verified
SC033805
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 903
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC033805 Inspection date 23/01/2014 Inspector Seka Graovac Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 29/07/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
This is a local authority's children's home. The home is registered to accommodate and support up to six children and young people with emotional and/or behavioural difficulties.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .
p.3
Progress
At the last inspection that was carried out on 29 July 2013, the overall effectiveness of the service was judged to be good. All the aspects looked at, such as the outcomes for young people, quality of care, safeguarding and leadership and management were judged to be good.
p.3
Progress
However, some areas for improvement were identified resulting in three requirements being made. The management has implemented an appropriate action plan to address the identified shortfalls. Fuller compliance with regulations has been secured. The improvement that has been achieved means that young people are receiving better service.
p.3
Progress
In respect of behaviour management, the manager was asked to improve the quality of record keeping of physical interventions. There has been only one incident when the staff had to resort to using a physical intervention. This was to stop the young person from causing further damage to a personal property and themselves. Comprehensive records have been kept to evidence that the physical intervention was appropriately used and was effective. Since that time, the manager has introduced a new recording format that combines the information previously kept in two different forms: one to record the physical intervention and another one to record the incident. This change has been introduced to avoid unnecessary repetition and to make record-keeping more efficient. Better record keeping of physical interventions protects staff and young people better and provides for more meaningful monitoring. Stream-lined record-
p.3
Progress
keeping creates more time for the staff to focus on young people rather than on paperwork.
p.4
Progress
Staff expertise in supporting young people to develop more positive behaviours has continued to grow. Staff are able to build relationships with young people based on trust. They are effective at enabling young people to accept more responsibility for their behaviour. They are keen not to criminalise young people, but to work with them to help them develop more constructive behaviours.
p.4
Progress
At the last inspection, the manager was also asked to ensure that Ofsted is notified without delay of all significant events, in line with the regulations, schedule 5. There has been only one incident when staff called the police to the home. As required, this incident has been notified to Ofsted without delay. Notifications being swiftly sent to Ofsted, enables us to scrutinise the actions taken by the home and if necessary, intervene using out regulatory powers. This strengthens safeguarding young people.
p.4
Progress
Staff have become more proficient in the use of the council's information technology systems. This has facilitated easier sharing of information and more effective communication between the home and other professionals involved in the lives of young people. This has had a particularly positive impact on monitoring of young people's school attendance and engagement with learning. All young people are in education and there is a concerted effort to help them attain positive learning outcomes.
p.4
Progress
Since the last visit, the management has particularly focused on improving further the partnership working with other professionals. The home works closely with the local police to ensure protection of young people. Monthly meetings with the police officer designated for missing young people have been reinstated.
p.4
Progress
Staff have been effective at helping some young people to be missing less frequently. For example, some young people are now more likely to keep in touch with staff on the phone, when they are away from home without permission. One young person who was missing for the best part of the first month after the admission, is now engaging well with the staff and not going missing.
p.4
Progress
The third requirement related to improving the reports on the six-monthly reviews of the quality of care in the home, so that they provide for more consultation with young people. The management has developed a written questionnaire to capture young people's views in a more systematic manner and give them a stronger voice in shaping the development of the service. Young people report that they feel listened to. They have positive experience of care and living in this home. They have continued to make good progress across different areas of their welfare and development. They rate highly their relationships with staff and the quality of the service they receive.
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.6
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion