Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Mar 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Julie Winyard

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Julie Winyard

  • Postcode verified

    IP4 1PJ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+40Positivemore positive than 45% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexceptionalhigh expectationsfeel safesafeconsistentlyeffectivelyclear
Criticismconcernsnot consistentlyunclearlowerbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings358w+52
  • Leadership363w+23
  • What needs to improve63w+29

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
784
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 43%Leadership 44%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 6%

Full report text

Steve Wood Headteacher Clifford Road Primary School Clifford Road Ipswich Suffolk IP4 1PJ

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 11 February 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

School

The inspection was a monitoring inspection carried out in accordance with no formal designation procedures and conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was carried out because the Chief Inspector was concerned about the effectiveness of arrangements to safeguard children at the school.

p.1

Evidence

I scrutinised the single central record and other documents relating to safeguarding children and child protection arrangements. I met with you, a senior leader, the family liaison officer, a group of pupils, some parents, the Chair of the Governing Body, and a representative of the local authority. Documents relating to individual pupils were scrutinised and a walk around all the classrooms to look at the support for pupils was carried out with you and the family liaison officer.

p.1

Evidence

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Evidence

The school’s safeguarding arrangements meet requirements.

p.1

Context

The school currently has 450 pupils, which makes it larger than most primary schools. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for additional government funding through the pupil premium is lower than in most schools, but is increasing. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T: 0121 679 9164 Direct E: tim.ogbourn@serco.com The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported at school action is a little above average. The proportion supported at school action plus or through a statement of special educational needs is broadly average. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups and whose first language is believed not to be English is slightly below average. One teacher has left the school since the previous section 5 inspection.

p.1

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils’ behaviour, as seen during the monitoring inspection in lessons, at break times and when they moved around the school, was good. This is because the school’s good behaviour management systems are consistently applied by all adults, and teachers have high expectations of all pupils. All staff know the pupils well, and work effectively with the family liaison officer to make sure pupils feel safe and that most are ready to learn when they arrive.

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

Leaders and managers take all reasonable steps to make sure the children are safe and well cared for while they are in the school. Pupils say they feel safe in school and the majority of parents who responded to Parent View think their children are safe. You and the deputy headteacher know the children and their families well and can show the progress all pupils make from their various starting points. If pupils are not making expected progress, staff can explain why this is the case and the impact of actions they are taking to help these pupils.

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

The family liaison officer has an exceptional knowledge of the most vulnerable children because she has developed good relationships with them and their families. Together with the special educational needs coordinator, learning mentor and teachers, she carefully monitors the ability of these pupils to settle into school, build friendships with other pupils and make good relationships with the adults who work with them. However, senior leaders have not given enough thought to how to make sure pupils who have emotional and behavioural difficulties are supported from when they leave their homes to their arrival at school, so they settle down quickly and are ready to learn.

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

The single central register of checks on staff’s suitability to work with children meets requirements. All staff are trained in child protection procedures, and you and the family liaison officer are trained to train the other staff. There is a useful display in the staffroom detailing the school’s safeguarding procedures, and all staff are clear about these. Where there are concerns about a child, the school keeps very detailed records of how matters are dealt with. Governors review the arrangements to safeguard pupils at least once a year, as required. They are kept well informed about pupils’ welfare and are therefore able to hold senior leaders to account.

p.2

External support

The local authority works with the school to take all reasonable steps to keep children safe. However, the support the school receives is not consistently good. This is because it is sometimes unclear why families are moved between different levels of support, and this information is not communicated to the school.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

 Make sure there is a clear policy and procedures to help pupils who have emotional and behavioural problems to start the beginning of their school day well.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the Director of Children’s Services for Suffolk, the Secretary of State for Education and the Chair of the Governing Body. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion