Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Mar 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Adam Higgins

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Adam Higgins

  • Postcode verified

    SE1 2AE

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−20Mixedmore positive than 15% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisehigh qualityeffectivestrengthseffectivelysuccessfulswiftly
Criticismpoorweaknessesinconsistenttoo manyunclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,070
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Ms Kate Wooder Executive Headteacher Tower Bridge Primary School Fair Street London SE1 2AE

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 3 March 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Primary School

 ensure that the improvement plan is sharply focused with regular and specific milestones against which the governing body can measure improvement.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I met with you, the deputy headteacher and the inclusion leader, the Chair of the Governing Body and another governor, and three representatives of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I spoke to a group of six pupils from Years 5 and 6. I evaluated the school improvement plan. Records of visits by local authority officers, achievement information and recent records of monitoring the quality of teaching and learning were scrutinised. I joined you to visit some classrooms where we looked at pupils’ English and mathematics books. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection, the headteacher and deputy headteacher have left the school. The school has entered into a soft federation for a fixed period, with Snowsfields Primary School, Southwark. Subsequently, you have been appointed as the executive headteacher across both schools. The deputy headteacher, inclusion manager and school business manager from Snowsfields are working across the two schools. Two teachers have left the school and both have been replaced with temporary appointments. A temporary teaching assistant has been appointed to help develop the provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.2

Main findings

At the time of my visit, you had been the executive headteacher at the school for only six days; already the influence of your leadership can be felt. You plan to improve the quality of teaching and learning by using a coaching model, which will team up teachers from the two schools, so that they are able to learn from each other. You have already established a training plan to develop teachers’ confidence and accuracy at assessing how well their pupils achieve.

p.2

Main findings

You have inherited a post-inspection action plan that is no longer fit-for-purpose because it does not take into account the range of opportunities now made available through the partnership with Snowsfields. You are re-writing the plan to include the support that is available through the partnership arrangement. Importantly, the revised plan will be strengthened by the inclusion of milestones that governors can use to hold school leaders to account at frequent intervals.

p.2

Main findings

The quality of learning in classrooms is still inconsistent. This was evident both from the school’s progress data and from pupils’ books. When we visited the majority of the classrooms, we saw that the quality of marking in pupils’ books varied considerably. The work of many pupils was of a very poor quality and was not being checked closely enough by teachers. Some pupils were doing work that was too easy and that did not provide them with adequate challenge. The pupils that I spoke to said that all too frequently, the work was too easy. Mathematics and English books show that in too many classes, teachers do not expect enough of their pupils. In some of the classrooms that we visited, the role of teaching assistants was unclear. This stopped them from making a significant contribution to pupils learning.

p.2

Main findings

You shared your plans to develop the Early Years Foundation Stage because you have already identified that there is still considerable work to be done here. The provision in both the Nursery and Reception classes requires considerable improvement. The activities and resources in the shared outside area were of a very poor quality and the provision in the classrooms did not do enough to excite and engage children. The Early Years Foundation Stage leader from Snowsfields will work with teachers at Tower Bridge to increase the opportunities for children to engage with high quality activities that have been carefully planned to meet their needs.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body has responded quickly to the outcome of the inspection. It is working in partnership with the local authority to move the school forward and has made a commitment to the partnership with Snowsfields. It has had an external review of its work and identified the areas in which it needs to improve. You sensibly plan to combine this information into the new improvement plan. The governors who met with me had a realistic view of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. They are arranging training for all governors, to enable them to hold the school more effectively to account for the improvements.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority has acted swiftly to broker the partnership between Tower Bridge Primary School and Snowsfields Primary School. In doing this, it has ensured that experienced and successful leadership is at the helm of the school. It has also provided some support for the development of the Early Years Foundation Stage, which you have appreciated. The linked school improvement adviser has provided good support to evaluate the quality of the teaching at the school. However, both you and the governors agree that the support provided by a leadership consultant has been of most use to the school during this period of change. This support has enabled you and your leadership team to focus solely on teaching and learning without the distraction of other issues, in the short amount of time that you have been leading the school. The local authority has also financially supported the partnership.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Southwark.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion