Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Archways Care Limited in Worcestershire

Inspected 21 Jan 2014 · published 18 Mar 2014 · URN SC383941

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Martha Nethaway

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    21 Jan 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Martha Nethaway

  • URN verified

    SC383941

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+27Mostly positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progresspositiveimprovedstrongfeel safewarmnurturingenjoy
Criticisminadequatefailednot metdeclinednot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings744w+31
  • What needs to improve74w−14

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
818
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 50
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 81%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 11%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC383941 Inspection date 21/01/2014 Inspector Martha Nethaway Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 19/06/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

This is a privately owned children's home for four young people with emotional and behavioural difficulties.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .

p.3

Progress

At the last full inspection visit in June 2013 the overall quality rating for the service was judged as good. The home was set three recommendations and these have been met. The home has improved the written recruitment records, especially related to internal staff promotion. Staffing ratios have increased with the appointment of new staff. The home has improved how staff induction, probation and appraisal is organised. Leaders and managers now have a continual cycle of on-going training and appraisal throughout the year. All these positive actions show a good commitment to continuous improvement.

p.3

Progress

Progress since the last inspection is good. Young people remain settled. There is positive progress being made by the young people living at the home. There are many strong elements, such as education. Staff are very committed to working hard with young people. Young people are attending school or further work related placements. They achieve well because their educational experience and outcomes are prioritised. Staff use creative and initiative ways to engage young people. As a result, young people’s experience of work related employment and education are positive. One young person commented, ‘When I leave here I will work with horses. I have been able to develop this while living here.’ Young people are safe and feel safe in the home. Young people do not go missing from the home. Staff accredited this to the good priority given to young people’s safety and welfare. Young people behave well and show care and consideration for

p.3

Progress

each other and staff. Young people learn important social skills, such as thinking and acting with respect for themselves and others. The atmosphere within the home is warm and nurturing.

p.4

Progress

Young people enjoy taking part in a wide range of recreational activities. One young person commented, ‘I play rugby weekly.’ Another young person commented, ‘I spend all the time I can with my horses.’ Consequently, young people get intrinsic enjoyment from these activities. Young people’s level of confidence in their independence skills is good. Older young people prepare and cook simple meals. Older young people have a clear desire to be independent.

p.4

Progress

Young people’s consultation and ability to engage is good. Young people take part in ‘house meetings’. They regularly discuss meals, activities and many topics about fairness. This allows young people to make an effective contribution to the care they receive.

p.4

Progress

The home has in place a good quality assurance programme. Leaders and managers are progressing well with the home’s development plan. The home has concentrated on improvements with staffing levels at the home. Extra staff have been recruited. The home has not admitted any new young people. This is because the current young people’s needs are well matched and compatible. This allows the home to run smoothly to meet the specific needs of the young people.

p.4

Progress

As a result of this visit, the home has been asked to amend and change the quality assurance report submitted to Ofsted. This is because it does not yet evaluate how trends and patterns are being tracked to lead to further improvement. The Registered Manager has already begun to address this issue. This is a minor short fall and has no direct bearing on the good outcomes and quality of care that young people achieve.

p.4

Statutory Requirements

This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.

p.4

Reg. Requirement Due date

(2001) ensure the system for monitoring the matters set out in schedule 6 and improving the quality of care, with particular reference to identifying patterns and trends to lead to improvement. (Regulation 34 (1(b)) 28/02/2014

p.4

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.6

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion