Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Benecare Limited in Kent
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
22 Jan 2014
- Inspectors verified
Mark Blesky
- URN verified
SC438648
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 906
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 38, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC438648 Inspection date 22/01/2014 Inspector Mark Blesky Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 11/04/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
This home is operated by a private company who also manage a fostering agency and three further children's homes. This is a home for two children with emotional and behavioural difficulties.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress .
p.3
Progress
At the time of this inspection, the home was open and operational; however there have been no young people resident in this home since October 2013. A decision was taken by the responsible individual to defer any placements until the home had resolved some previous difficulties with behaviour management.
p.3
Progress
The home has recruited a new experienced and knowledgeable staff team. Many of the staff members are from other homes, within the company and have worked together previously. Training for individual team members is in place and the staff members are also training collectively through staff meetings and group supervisions. Staff say that this is enabling them to work together effectively as a team.
p.3
Progress
At the previous inspection in April 2013, the home was judged good for overall effectiveness and adequate for leadership and management.
p.3
Progress
One requirement was made related to staff recruitment documents and five recommendations were made. These included taking into account the views of the young people, behaviour management and producing a development plan for the home. Recommendation was also raised in respect of staff supervision.
p.3
Progress
The requirement has been addressed and recommendations made at the previous inspection have in most cases been met. However, due to the absence of young people in the home, since October 2013, it is not possible to determine what difference this may make to the outcomes of young people. Therefore, in some cases, information prior to October 2013 has been referenced in this inspection visit to determine the homes progress since the previous inspection.
p.4
Progress
Staff recruitment files have been reviewed with the clearer and more concise practices in place. References and statutory checks for staff are more clearly referenced within the employment documents and this has supported more robust recruitment practices. Files are easy to navigate and well-organised.
p.4
Progress
Young people's meetings and house meetings are now more engaging. The improved format enables young people to communicate and articulate their comments and views more clearly. Records demonstrate that young people's views are discussed and documents demonstrate the actions that are taken following consultation with them. Key working sessions have been increased and have become more themed. Sessions now focus on specific agendas that are related both to the young people's broader care plan aims and their day-to-day needs. This has resulted in a more engaging key working process.
p.4
Progress
In addition, key working is now used specifically for both prior to and following young people’s statutory reviews. This has allowed young people to discuss matters related to their forthcoming review and has resulted in young people being better prepared for their reviews. Following the review, key working sessions consider how any changes will be implemented which provides further opportunities for young people to be engaged in their care planning.
p.4
Progress
Behaviour management has been reviewed and the manager has implemented a more reflective and evaluative oversight of young people's behaviour. This has resulted in staff members considering their responses to negative behaviour and identifying the actions most likely to encourage positive outcomes.
p.4
Progress
Young people benefit from being consulted in the type of actions that should result from their behaviour. Staff say that sanctions are not their first choice and with more reflective practices, they are often able to negotiate improved behaviour. This results in a much more positive response to behaviour management and encourages young people to take responsibility for their actions.
p.4
Progress
A development plan has been produced by the home and this details both material and practical plans for the home such as furnishings and equipment. It also details practice issues such as supervision, team meetings and key working. The current plan is realistic and appropriately focused on the needs of young people and aimed at improving their outcomes. Staff supervision practices have been reviewed and regular supervision sessions are now in place. Expectations of supervision are high and there is a stronger focus on professional development and a more evaluative consideration of performance. Staff members spoken to say, that their supervision is engaging, challenging and supportive. Staff members say that supervision provides them with good opportunities to look at both training and development and also their day-to-day performance in providing care.
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.6
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion