Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 Mar 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jeremy Spencer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jeremy Spencer

  • Postcode verified

    NG24 1LT

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+37Positivemore positive than 43% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivestrongeffectivelyimprovedimprovingsuccessfulengaging
Criticismnot alwayslackconcernsslownot positivelylow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
843
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs Sarah Holland Headteacher Lovers Lane Primary and Nursery School Warburton Street Newark NG24 1LT

p.1

and Nursery School

Following my visit to your school on 4 March 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

and Nursery School

The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in December 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

and Nursery School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

and Nursery School

 ensure that senior leaders maintain the school’s improvement, by prioritising the future actions to be taken to improve the school more efficiently and effectively  ensure that you, as the headteacher, communicate more effectively with staff to ensure that staff fully understand their roles and responsibilities, and to raise staff morale.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, and separately with your deputy headteacher and other leaders. I also met with two representatives of the governing body, including the Chair, and with a representative working on behalf of the local authority. We visited each class for a short period of time to look at work in pupils’ books together. I also looked at a number of documents, including minutes from Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 01216 799164 Direct email : tim.ogbourn@serco.com governing body meetings and the school’s information about pupils’ progress and standards.

p.1

Context

Since the last monitoring visit, in April 2013, you returned to the school in the autumn term 2013, following a period of illness. A new Chair of the Governing Body has recently been elected.

p.2

Main findings

Work in pupils’ books, drop-ins to classes and the school’s records of teachers’ work indicate that the quality of teaching is improving. Appropriate actions are being taken by leaders to tackle the small remainder of teaching which is still less than good. As a result, pupils are making better progress than they did previously. However, several pupils in Year 6, despite making strong progress this year, are still making up for their previous underachievement in developing reading skills. Pupils across the school, including children in the Early Years Foundation Stage, are being given more frequent opportunities to develop their writing skills. This, when combined with improving teaching quality, is leading to greatly improved writing standards across the school.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have been effective in implementing successful strategies to improve pupils’ attendance. Pupils’ attendance in the Autumn term 2013 was much improved on their attendance during the same period in 2012.

p.2

Main findings

A review of governance has taken place and this has helped to ensure that governors now have a clearer understanding of their roles and responsibilities. Governors have also received appropriate training to help develop their skills in analysing data about pupils’ progress. The new Chair of the Governing Body has got off to a strong start, and has outlined his raised expectations of the contributions that he expects governors to make to the school. An increased number of governors are now engaging in activities to check on the school’s performance. However, governors still do not offer as much challenge to leaders as they could do, and understand that they still need to improve their work in this area.

p.2

Main findings

Despite the school taking effective actions to improve since the last inspection, there are signs that the pace of change and improvement is beginning to slow down. This is because, more recently, leaders have not always ensured that the advice they receive and buy into from others, including from a local teaching partnership, translates into manageable and well understood actions for staff to take. Consequently, teachers say that they are receiving a lack of clarity and direction from you, as the headteacher. As a result, teachers report that staff morale is currently very low. This causes me some concerns, and I will return to the school in the summer term 2014 to gauge the progress made in dealing with this issue.

p.2

External support

The local authority has provided effective support to senior leaders which has primarily focused on strategies to help leaders to monitor and improve the quality of teaching, and tackle any underperformance. Support from other strategic partners has begun more recently, and it is difficult to fully assess the impact of this at such an early stage. However, staff are not responding positively to some of the new systems that are being implemented in the school as a result of these partnerships, and believe that the progress of the school is being slowed as a result.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, and the Director of Children’s Services for Nottinghamshire local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion