Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- URN verified
EY425115
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This visit has raised serious concerns about the standard of learning and development. p.2
- An Ofsted inspector, Kamaljit Kaur Jandu / Johanna Holt, monitored your provision on 12/02/2014 following your inspection where the provision was judged to be inadequate. p.1
- Overall the provider had made inadequate progress in addressing the points for improvement. p.2
- The provider had not yet fully met the actions raised at inspection and further concerns were observed. p.1
- This meant that children’s safety was compromised. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 725
- shorter than usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD Telephone: 0300 123 1231 Fax: 0300 123 3159 Minicom: 0161 618 8524 Email: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk Web: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Monitoring for provision judged as inadequate
An Ofsted inspector, Kamaljit Kaur Jandu / Johanna Holt, monitored your provision on 12/02/2014 following your inspection where the provision was judged to be inadequate.
p.1
Outcome of monitoring
As a result of our inspection on 24/07/2013, we sent you a notice to improve.
p.1
Outcome of monitoring
The notice of action to improve asked you to: ensure there is a regular two-way flow of information with other early years settings that children attend in order to find out about and support continuity in learning and development.
p.1
Outcome of monitoring
The additional action that you were required to take to improve related to the learning and development aspects of care for children. We asked you to: ensure that parents are provided with a short written summary of their child's development in the prime areas when they are aged between two and three years, identifying the child's strengths and any areas where their progress is less than expected; gain sufficient knowledge of the learning and development requirements in order to provide appropriate learning experiences for children and use information from observations and assessments more accurately to clearly identify the next steps in children's learning so every child makes suitable progress.
p.1
Outcome of monitoring
A monitoring visit took place on 25 September 2013. The provider had not yet fully met the actions raised at inspection and further concerns were observed. The provider had identified risks to children from building materials that were on the driveway to the premises but had taken no action to remove or minimise this risk. In addition, emergency evacuation of the premises was restricted because a pushchair was stored in the hallway. This meant that children’s safety was compromised. A Welfare Requirements Notice was issued asking the provider to: take reasonable steps to ensure the safety of children, staff and others on the premises in the case of fire or any other emergency, with specific reference to ensuring emergency evacuation routes are clear and free from obstruction at all times that children are on the premises, and to ensure that the premises, including outdoor spaces, are fit for purpose by undertaking regular risk assessments and taking action to remove or
p.1
Outcome of monitoring
minimise any risks identified, with specific reference to the building materials on the driveway. A further monitoring visit was scheduled for within three months.
p.1
Outcome of monitoring
A further monitoring visit took place on 5 November 2013. Overall the provider had made inadequate progress in addressing the points for improvement. This visit has raised serious concerns about the standard of learning and development. The next visit will be a further monitoring visit.
p.2
Outcome of monitoring
A third monitoring visit took place on 12 February 2014. The provider has now fully met the notice of actions to improve that was issued following her last inspection, and the welfare requirements notice. She remains in contact with the reception class teacher at the school that children attend to discuss the activities that children engage in, and she now utilised this information to help children continue to make progress in her setting. Activities planned help children make satisfactory progress as the provider has taken steps to develop her knowledge and understanding of the Early Years Foundation Stage, and is now more able to implement this effectively. Observations and assessments are now in place for all children to support them to make progress. Observations are evaluated and next steps are identified for children. The provider has developed her knowledge and understanding of what to include in
p.2
Outcome of monitoring
the progress check between the ages of two years and three years, and is now clear about the reasons why this check is important. Although there are no children currently attending within this age range, the provider understands that the check must be completed if they do attend, in order to assess their development in detail and identify next steps or any specific needs that children may have.
p.2
Outcome of monitoring
Having considered all the evidence, the inspector is of the opinion that the childminder has taken prompt and effective action to address the points for improvement.
p.2
Next steps
The next step will be a full inspection.
p.2
Next steps
I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your childminding service. If you have any further queries please contact us on the number at the top of this letter.
p.2
Next steps
Lorna Fitzjohn National Director, Childminding
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion