Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Dorset Council in Dorset
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
14 Jan 2014
- Inspectors verified
Jennifer Reed
- URN verified
SC032163
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance5
“There has been improvement in the leadership and the management of the home.” p.5
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,691
- about usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC032163 Inspection date 14/01/2014 Inspector Jennifer Reed Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 22/05/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
This home is part of a range of services provided by a local authority. The home is currently registered to accommodate up to 14 children who have complex learning difficulties and disabilities. The home is reaching the end of a period of transition of re-focusing its service provision. The home, originally a short break service, is now mostly meeting the needs of children and young people who require longer term placements. Only one placement is still being provided as a short break service.
p.3
Brief description of the service
At the time of the inspection the home was providing care and accommodation for seven young people. The four distinct units located within the home operate to meet the differing needs of accommodated young people.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress .
p.3
Progress
The children’s home was judged to be adequate overall at the full inspection undertaken in May 2013. Since the previous inspection, the service has demonstrated its commitment to improving the quality of care and outcomes for accommodated young people. The home has made satisfactory progress in addressing the one requirement and the majority of the eighteen recommendations made for improvement raised at the previous inspection. At this interim inspection, two requirements and two recommendations were made to promote further improvement. Risk assessment processes within the home show a more individualised and focused approach to assessment. A generic approach to the risk assessment of the premises has reduced. Due regard is given to children’s rights and the consideration of how the home’s environment can best meet each young person’s unique needs. For example, a review has been undertaken of the locking of some internal doors and
p.3
Progress
the fitting of safety guards on all radiators. This has improved the environment for those young people who do not require the protection of such rigorous safety measures. These young people now enjoy more open access within the home and unnecessary safeguards have been removed. Staff are working to reduce the possibility of a risk averse culture operating within the home and young people have opportunity to take appropriate controlled risks as a normal part of growing up. This helps young people’s personal and social development as they move towards adulthood. Young people are able to choose and plan their meals, shop for their ingredients and cook the evening meal on a regular basis.
p.4
Progress
The accommodation units are being refurbished and re-organised to provide more personalised areas of the home that will effectively support young people’s diverse needs. A considerable amount of work has been completed to redecorate and refurbish areas of the home to provide a pleasant living environment for young people. Three out of the four units are beginning to look more homely and staff have further plans in place to enrich the quality of the home. The fourth unit is scheduled for redecoration. Written guidance for staff and most white boards have been removed from unit walls; some metal radiator cages have been taken off. This contributes to reducing an institutional approach to caring for young people and also improves the quality of the young people’s home. However, risk assessments for some young people identify that they do need radiators to be covered to promote their welfare and keep them safe from harm. The metal cages are still in place
p.4
Progress
around these radiators in some areas of the home and their design continues to provide an institutional feel and reduces the appearance of a family home environment.
p.4
Progress
A good effort has been made by the home to provide a more stimulating environment designed to support young people’s comfort and developmental needs. Staff are mindful of what each young person needs, likes and enjoys. The units have been reorganised, or are in the process of re-organisation to maximise the use of space in ways that will benefit young people’s personal development. The staff team demonstrate knowledge and enthusiasm to progress their plans for improvement. However, budgetary constraints impact on the amount of resources that can be made available to the home to provide a wider range of stimuli that will support young people’s behaviour, mood and needs. Nevertheless, since the last inspection, the home has set up weekly arrangements for staff to externally access different stimulating toys and games for young people to enjoy at their leisure. Young people’s views are taken into account in the development of the home. One young
p.4
Progress
person said, ‘I chose the green paint and I helped choose things in the sitting room. I like it!’ Participation opportunities help young people to build their confidence and increase their skills and self-esteem.
p.4
Progress
Since the last inspection, the staffing structure of the home has changed and been improved in response to the changing function of the home. Staff have been appointed to their respective posts, following a review of their skills and competencies, to ensure staff are able to effectively carry out their duties. Staff now have clear job descriptions and contracts which clearly outline their roles and responsibilities. Recruitment and selection processes are in place to provide a full staffing establishment that will have the capacity to cover planned leave, training and sickness absences. This is likely to significantly improve the continuity of care young people receive and their attachments will not be overly disrupted.
p.4
Progress
Staff rotas have been revised and there is now sufficient time allocated within rotas for senior workers to handover between each shift. This contributes to improvement in communication within the home which underpins the delivery of care practices that are likely to lead to positive outcomes for young people.
p.5
Progress
There has been improvement in the leadership and the management of the home. The results of statutory reviews and reviews of placement and care plans are recorded promptly on young people’s files. The quality of recording within the home’s records has improved and entries are legible. The Registered Manager completes regular review reports of the home’s monthly monitoring, processes and forwards these to Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector (HMCI), as is required. However, these reports and the system in place for reviewing the home’s records do not evidence a sufficiently rigorous approach to monitoring. Management oversight does not routinely include the evaluation and analysis of information, and the identification of trends and patterns. Minor errors in young people’s case files have not been identified, although these have not to date, adversely impacted on outcomes for young people. Nevertheless, these shortfalls impact on the home’s ability to identify
p.5
Progress
issues of concern to inform the continual improvement of the quality of care provided by the home.
p.5
Progress
The previously identified shortfalls in the quality of the local authority’s independent persons’ monthly visits and reports, were being addressed by the local authority at the time of this inspection. The independent persons are receiving training and a new reporting format has been devised. However, monthly reports for visits to the home have not been sent to the home or HMCI in recent months. This weakens safeguarding within the home.
p.5
Progress
Staff report that they generally receive regular supervision. However, there are no effective management or monitoring systems in place to provide a clear overview of the frequency of supervision to staff, to ensure they receive the support they require to look after young people well and to enhance their professional development.
p.5
Progress
Staff benefit from a good range of training, in both core areas and in specific areas to meet the needs of the young people and the purpose of the home. Managers within the home have set up detailed training records which now clearly identify the qualifications gained and the training courses completed by each member of staff. A number of staff are enrolled on the Level 3 Children and Young People’s Workforce Diploma with mandatory social care pathway, and four further staff have been nominated this year by the home to commence their training to achieve this award. However, no arrangements are in place for the night staff to undertake Level 3 training.
p.5
Progress
The Registered Manager is currently updating the home’s Statement of Purpose to reflect the recent changes in the operation of the home.
p.6
Statutory Requirements
This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.
p.6
Reg. Requirement Due date
(2001) ensure that all persons employed receive appropriate training, supervision and appraisal (Regulation 27(4)(c)) 31/03/2014
p.6
Reg. Requirement Due date
(2001) ensure the person carrying out the visit prepares a written report on the conduct of the home. (Regulation 33(4)(c)) 28/02/2014
p.6
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.6
Recommendations
ensure the home provides a comfortable and homely environment and is well maintained and decorated. Risk reduction does not lead to an institutional feel; in particular, continue the work in progress to satisfactorily meet this standard (NMS 10.3) monitor, in line with regulations, all records kept by the home to ensure compliance with the home's policies, to identify any concerns about specific incidents and to identify patterns and trends. Immediate action is taken to address any issues raised by this monitoring. (NMS 21.2)
p.6
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.7
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion