Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Mar 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    PE13 2ES

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 52% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiserapid progressoutstandingimprovingeffectivesuccessfulclearclearly
Criticismlimitedyet tonot clearlynot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
792
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Dr Susan Dowling Headteacher Clarkson Infants School Trafford Road Wisbech PE13 2ES

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 25 February 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the time you spent with me on the phone prior to my visit. I am grateful to the school’s deputy headteacher for the help he gave me and for the time he made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School

 review the allocation of responsibilities across the leadership team to ensure smooth communication when you are off site and sustained impact of your actions on the quality of teaching and learning  clarify how the special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) will play a full role in improving the quality of teaching and learning  identify more clearly specific actions, targets and success criteria to improve attendance  act on the findings of the governance review as a matter of urgency.

p.1

Evidence

Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 01216 799154 Direct email : aidan.dunne@serco.com During the visit, I held meetings with the school’s deputy headteacher. I met five governors, including the chair of the governing body. I spoke to a local authority representative. I evaluated your strategic and operational plans. I reviewed recent achievement and attendance data, and read the outcomes of the governance review that took place in December 2013. I carried out brief visits to lessons with the deputy headteacher and spoke to teachers and pupils about their work.

p.1

Context

One teacher left after the inspection and one is leaving at Easter. You have agreed to stay as interim headteacher until the successful recruitment of a permanent leader for the school. New governors have joined the governing body.

p.2

Main findings

With the support of staff you are beginning to drive improvement through regular reviews of teaching and learning, better engagement with parents and stronger focus on progress made in each year group. Teachers are improving the learning environment so that pupils can access the necessary resources to improve their skills, for example through clear display of key vocabulary and better reading materials. The emphasis on developing literacy skills from an early age is promoted and parents are rightly encouraged to contribute. Pupil progress meetings provide opportunities to challenge teachers’ expectation and ensure that work matches pupils’ abilities. However, the monitoring of teaching of pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) requires consolidation. The current SENCo, who is also the child protection designated person, has limited time to share her expertise and to ensure that pupils receiving intensive support make rapid progress.

p.2

Main findings

Your plans are focused on accelerating pupils’ progress and improving the quality of teaching. However, actions, targets and time-lines to improve attendance are not articulated clearly enough. In addition, the proportions for outstanding teaching and for pupils exceeding expected progress should be specified. With the support of the local authority adviser, you are tracking the school’s progress closely. The deputy headteacher is fairly new to the school. A review of leadership responsibilities is required to ensure that all leaders are clear about their respective roles. Governors are starting to take action following the external review of governance that took place shortly after the inspection. However, they are yet to draft a clear action plan to identify what they want to do and by when. They are highly committed and are seeking evidence of the work of the school, for example through visits to look at reading, writing and the application of the marking policy. However,

p.2

Main findings

much remains to be done to demonstrate the impact of governance on the school’s effectiveness.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

You are drawing upon the external support provided by the local authority. The primary adviser and subject advisers visit regularly to offer additional support and challenge. Visits to other schools enable teachers to share good practice and there are developing links with the local junior school. The difference these opportunities are making is unproven. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Cambridgeshire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion