Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
NN9 6PA
- URN verified
EY312624
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The next step will be a full inspection. p.2
- I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your setting. p.2
- If you have any further queries please contact us on the number at the top of this letter. p.2
- Nick Hudson National Director, Early Education Our Reference EY312624 p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 627
- shorter than usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD Telephone: 0300 123 1231 Fax: 0300 123 3159 Minicom: 0161 618 8524 Email: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk Web: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Raunds Playgroup The Mobile, Manor School Mountbatten Way, Raunds Wellingborough Northamptonshire NN9 6PA Our Reference EY312624
p.1
Monitoring for provision judged as inadequate
An Ofsted inspector, Jan Burnet, monitored your provision on 13/02/2014 following your inspection where the provision was judged to be inadequate.
p.1
Outcome of monitoring
As a result of our inspection on 19/11/2013, we sent you a notice to improve. The actions you were set are included at the end of this letter.
p.1
Outcome of monitoring
During the monitoring visit the inspector discussed with you the steps you have taken to address the actions raised in the notice to improve. She discussed with you, and observed, how potential risks are managed, staff deployment and staff supervision of children. The inspector observed staff working with the children, spoke to a representative from the local authority, and spoke with parents.
p.1
Outcome of monitoring
The inspector found that you have minimised the risk to children's safety by ensuring that all doors are fitted with working security sensor alarms, by fitting chains to doors, and by ensuring that all gates to the premises are bolted. Before fitting safety chains to fire doors, you have ensured that you meet the requirements of the fire safety officer.
p.1
Outcome of monitoring
Effective steps have been taken to improve staff supervision of children and to ensure that staff are deployed efficiently in order to keep children safe. Issues concerning supervision and deployment were raised primarily around times when children were being collected after the morning session and arriving for the afternoon session. These times were 11.30am, 12pm or 12.30pm and it was possible for parents and children to enter/leave via the main entrance or doors at the side of the building into either of the two playrooms. In order to ensure children's safety is addressed effectively, the only time that parents now arrive with children for the afternoon session or collect after the morning session is at 12 noon. The children who stay all day have their lunch in one room and arriving parents enter through the Our Reference EY312624
p.1
Outcome of monitoring
front door and join this group. Children who leave at 12 noon play in the other room and parents enter through the side door into this room and leave with their child through the same door. At this time there are always two staff in each room and so supervision of children and deployment of staff are appropriately addressed.
p.2
Outcome of monitoring
The inspector found that these changes have been made with the help of a representative from the local authority. Parents have been informed of the incident prior to the last inspection and the inspection outcome. Consequently, they have been understanding of the changes that have been made. During the monitoring visit the staff to child ratio exceeded the minimum requirement. The interaction between staff and children was positive and children were happily involved in a wide range of activities. They enjoyed flexible use of both playrooms and the outdoor play area. Staff were deployed effectively.
p.2
Outcome of monitoring
Having considered all the evidence, the inspector is of the opinion that the setting has taken prompt and effective action to address the points for improvement.
p.2
Next steps
The next step will be a full inspection.
p.2
Next steps
I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your setting. If you have any further queries please contact us on the number at the top of this letter.
p.2
Next steps
Nick Hudson National Director, Early Education Our Reference EY312624
p.2
Action Due date Closed date
ensure children are supervised appropriately at all times to help guarantee their safety 13/02/2014 13/02/2014
p.3
Action Due date Closed date
ensure staff are deployed efficiently in order to keep all children safe 13/02/2014 13/02/2014
p.3
Action Due date Closed date
complete daily risk assessments prior to the children entering the playgroup, to ensure any risks to children's safety are minimised. 13/02/2014 13/02/2014
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion