Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Ullswater Community College

Inspected 14 Feb 2014 · published 11 Mar 2014 · URN 112393

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Feb 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Alan Parkinson, Bernard Robinson, Brian Hill, Doreen Davenport, John Paddick, Lesley Powell

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    CA11 8NG

  • Name on report verified

    Ullswater Community College

  • URN verified

    112393

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+58Positivemore positive than 22% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingeffectiveimprovedvery effectiveexceptionallyeffectivelyexcellentgood progress
Criticismrequires improvementinadequateunacceptablepersistent absencenot yetat riskfailedgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1721w+60
  • Leadership726w+45
  • What needs to improve96w+75

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,460
about usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Leadership 22%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 23%

Full report text

Ullswater Community College Wetheriggs Lane, Penrith, Cumbria, CA11 8NG

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Requires improvement 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  It has improved substantially in a relatively short space of time. Students of all ages and abilities achieve well in a very wide range of subjects and courses.  Above average GCSE results reflect the good progress that students make. The sixth form is good and enables students on AS, A-level and vocational courses to achieve well.  There is a good atmosphere for learning in all year groups.  When students have not made expected progress, the school provides very effective teaching to enable them to catch up.  Teaching is either good or outstanding in the large majority of lessons, and continually lifts students’ attainment.  Students behave well and relate very well to their teachers and visitors to the school. They say that there is almost no bullying or poor behaviour. This is why exclusions are very low.  Students’ attendance has improved to broadly average levels and persistent absence reduced.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Arrangements for students’ health and safety are good.  Parents are happy about the quality of education that the school provides.  The headteacher, the senior team, governors and middle managers are particularly effective in ensuring that teaching and students’ achievement continue to improve.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 The school has not yet reached the stage where all teaching is good and more frequently outstanding.  Although teaching is good overall, there is still some which requires improvement because it does not ensure students learn as much as they should, particularly the most able.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed 41 lessons, including three joint observations with the headteacher and his senior team.  They looked carefully at a wide range of students’ written work, especially in Years 9 and 11.  They held meetings with the headteacher, senior and middle managers, representatives of the governing body, members of staff, groups of students and a representative of the local authority.  Inspectors looked at many documents including the self-evaluation, development planning, records of students’ attainment and progress and safeguarding procedures.  They took account of 86 responses to the on-line (Parent View) questionnaire.

p.2

Inspection team

John Paddick, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Bernard Robinson Additional Inspector Lesley Powell Additional Inspector Alan Parkinson Additional Inspector Doreen Davenport Additional Inspector Brian Hill Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 Ullswater Community College is a larger than the average sized secondary school and has a large sixth form.  It serves an extremely large catchment area of around 600 square miles.  Almost all students are White British.  A greater than average proportion of students is supported through school action. Proportions of students supported through action plus or with a statement of special educational needs are below average.  The school has specially resourced provision for around 12 students with special educational needs; these relate to severe and profound and multiple learning difficulties.  The proportion of students known to be eligible for pupil premium is below average. (The pupil premium is additional funding for students who are known to be eligible for free school meals, children from service families and those looked after by the local authority.)  A small number of Year 11 students attends an engineering course at Kendal College.

p.3

Information about this school

 The school meets the government’s current floor standards which are the minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress.  The school is in the process of applying to convert to academy status.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the overall quality of teaching from good to outstanding by:  increasing the proportion of outstanding teaching and eliminating any which requires improvement  using the current outstanding classroom practice to show teachers how it is possible to reach the highest levels of effectiveness in the classroom  ensuring that teaching always stretches students’ thinking and pushes all to do their best, particularly the most able  ensuring marking provides clear guidance on how to improve and that effective systems are established for checking that students follow the advice given and improve their work.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Students achieve well in a wide range of GCSE, AS, A-level and vocational courses. On entry to Year 7, students have below average levels of attainment in English and mathematics. Nevertheless they gain GCSE results which are above the national average. Students achieve well in their academic and vocational courses in the sixth form.  GCSE results in 2013 rose substantially compared to 2012. Around two thirds of students gained five good A* to C grades, including English and mathematics, compared to approximately half of Year 11 in 2012. GCSE results in English and mathematics were above average in terms of the proportion of students with A* to C grades. The most-able students gain the highest grades.  In 2013, the results showed that there was a considerable gap between the performance of the majority of students and those known to be eligible for free school meals; at the end of Year 11, less than half of the eligible students gained five GSCEs at A* to C grades. This gap in

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

performance has now closed in the current Years 10 and 11 because the school has used its pupil premium funding well in providing extra teaching for students at risk of underachievement.  Results at AS and A-level have risen for the last three years. Results for grades A* to E were broadly average in 2013 but below average at grades A and B. Vocational course results were broadly average. Achievement is good because most students complete their courses, progress well from their starting points and move to further education, apprenticeships or employment.  The school provides well for the most able at AS and A-level. For example, an A-level further mathematics group revealed very high standards of academic achievement from students who have been offered university places.  The school has an outstandingly robust system for tracking students' progress. It shows that current students in Years 10 and 11 are progressing at least as well as the 2013 cohort and in

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

some respects better than that. This includes the most able, disabled students and those with special educational needs. Good promotion of equal opportunities is reflected in the way that the tracking system quickly identifies any students who are not reaching their targets, and triggers effective extra help for them.  In the large majority of lessons students of all abilities, including the most able made good progress in a wide range of subjects. Where teaching was outstanding progress was exceptionally rapid, for example in English, French, geography, physical education, drama and art. Occasionally, however, students progressed too slowly.  Year 11 students on the engineering course at Kendal College are making good progress. They are enthusiastic and can explain in detail how they have made cannons and other items out of a range of metals. They know how to use a range of hand tools and machines and understand

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

that accuracy and good quality finish are vital if they are to achieve the highest grades.  Students in the strategic resource base with severe learning difficulties achieve well because they are taught effectively by specialist teachers and assistants. These students often participate fully, with support, in mainstream lessons.  Scrutiny of students’ written work shows that they take a pride in the way that they present it. Writing has improved considerably since the previous inspection. Students express themselves well orally and on paper in a wide range of subjects, particularly the humanities. Numerical, algebraic and trigonometric skills have also improved.  The school has no plans to enter any students early for GCSE this year.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching has improved substantially since the previous inspection in response to effective management initiatives and staff training. Teachers demonstrate fully the characteristics outlined in the National Teaching Standards. Teaching is good in all year groups including the sixth form. This improvement is responsible for the rising GCSE results and for the successes in the sixth form in AS, A-level and vocational courses.  Typically, teachers create a positive learning environment where students are attentive and cooperative. They plan lessons well so it is clear what students are going to learn and how they are to build upon and consolidate their current knowledge and understanding. As lessons proceed, teachers and their assistants manage students well so that they move from one activity to another without taking too long. Relationships between teachers, their assistants and students are universally good.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 In the great majority of lessons teachers ensured that students of all levels of ability were enabled to make good progress. Good questioning deepened knowledge and understanding and quickly identified and explored concepts that students found difficult. Good planning meant that teachers had thought out how to move students’ learning forward. Teachers have good subject knowledge and their explanations are clear so students know what is expected of them.  Inspectors observed outstanding teaching several times. On these occasions, learning was extremely rapid and the quality of students’ work was very high. For example, in a drama lesson in Year 8 where progress was outstanding, groups of students performed in an exceptionally compelling manner which had the spellbound audience fully engaged and wondering what was coming next.  Where learning was not as brisk , there were a few occasions where the most-able students

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

were not being adequately challenged by work which failed to stretch their thinking Consequently, they did not do their best.  The marking of students’ work has improved but there is still some variation in practice. There is some excellent marking in English which clearly identifies where students can improve their work. Teachers then routinely follow up the advice given to ensure that students have made improvements, such as writing out spelling corrections. In A-level mathematics, there are excellent examples of test papers being marked very accurately and students doing corrections. Students themselves value this approach and derive great benefit from it. Some marking does not provide students with enough information about how to improve their work and there is a lack of procedures to ensure that students make good use of the feedback they are given.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 The behaviour of pupils is good. This is the case in lessons, when students move around the school and during breaks and lunchtimes.  Students are welcoming and helpful. Frequently, they are impeccably polite and well-mannered. In all year groups they behave well and display a mature and sensible attitude to learning. They are keen to do well at school and fully respect the adults who work with them. Occasionally, punctuality to lessons suffers slightly when students attend to mobile phones en route. Students know how to socialise effectively and relate well to teachers and their assistants. In class they play their part in ensuring that the atmosphere for learning is at least good. Very rarely, some students are restless in class when they become bored.  Participation in a wide range of extra-curricular activities is a strong feature of students’ life at school. They are keen to take part in drama, music, sport, voluntary work in the community and

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

visits to other countries. Older students display great maturity when they help the younger students to read, when they teach first aid skills and help young people through the school’s links to an orphanage and school in Tanzania.  Student perceptions gained through interviews with inspectors and the on-line parental survey strongly suggest that the almost consistently good behaviour that inspectors observed is typical of the school on a day-to-day basis.  Attendance is improving in response to the considerable efforts of many members of staff. It has now reached broadly average levels and persistent absence is continuing to decline. Exclusions for unacceptable conduct are low, and support the concept of good behaviour at the school on a daily basis.  The school’s work to keep pupils safe and secure is good. Students say that they feel perfectly safe in school and enjoy their education. They fully recognise and value what members of staff

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

do for them, especially if they have problems or are not meeting their targets. They fully understand how to keep safe and have learnt about a wide range of potential risks to their health and welfare, for example, in relation to the use of drugs, tobacco, alcohol and various types of bullying. They confirm that racist incidents and bullying are rare and that if they were to occur they have every confidence that staff would deal with them effectively. The school’s own records confirm that they are indeed rare and that appropriate action has been taken.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Ullswater Community College has improved very quickly because the headteacher, senior team and governors have a relentless and effective focus on improving the quality of teaching and on ensuring that all groups of students do well at GCSE and on sixth-form courses. They are ably supported by leaders at all levels, including middle leaders, the special educational needs coordinator and the head of sixth form, in ensuring that intended changes and improvements actually materialise. Middle leaders carry out their responsibilities effectively. Good leadership of the resource base ensures that the school caters well for students with the greatest needs.  The school employs very effective methods for checking how well it is doing and for setting targets for improvement. Consequently, it has quickly moved from requiring improvement to now providing an education of good quality.  Leadership of teaching is very effective in improving classroom practice. Leaders monitor

p.6

The leadership and management are good

teaching rigorously and provide teachers with appropriate areas for development. Performance management arrangements are robust and effective so the proportion of teaching which requires improvement is reducing substantially. However, there is still scope to make more use of the school’s outstanding classroom practice to provide models and approaches for other teachers.  Governors and leaders have considered very carefully how to provide the best possible curriculum for all groups of students. Consequently, students have the opportunity to choose from a very wide range of academic and vocational courses in Years 10 and 11, and in the sixth form. The school has no plans to enter any students early for GCSE this year. Strong promotion of equal opportunities means that all groups of students do well and where gaps in performance become apparent they close quickly in response to effective intervention. Pupil premium and

p.6

The leadership and management are good

Year 7 catch-up funding is used very effectively to provide small-group and individualised teaching to ensure that these students make as much progress as others. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is very effectively embedded into the curriculum and students benefit from a very large number of opportunities to be active in the community.  Good quality information about the world of work and courses inside and outside school enable students to make the right choices when they come to the end of Year 11 and the sixth form.  Safeguarding meets all requirements. Arrangements for checking on the identities of all adults who have access to students are outstanding.  The support provided by the local authority has been appropriate for the school’s needs and has helped the school to improve its performance.  The governance of the school:  Governors have a very clear understanding of how the school is doing and they know what

p.6

The leadership and management are good

still needs to be improved. They ensure that managers are challenged when appropriate and ensure that performance management systems are effective. They understand how well all groups of students are achieving, have an accurate view of the quality of teaching and ensure that any salary progression is merited. They know how the school uses pupil premium funding and Year 7 catch-up funding, and have a clear understanding of how it has been effective in closing gaps in performance.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 112393 Local authority Cumbria Inspection number 439344

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Secondary School category Foundation Age range of pupils 11–18 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 1396 Of which, number on roll in sixth form 227 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Alan Davis Headteacher Nigel Pattinson Date of previous school inspection 9 October 2012 Telephone number 01768 210206 Fax number 01768 210211 Email address npattinson@ullswater.cumbria.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion