Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 11 Mar 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Dilip Kadodwala

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Dilip Kadodwala

  • Postcode verified

    LE11 2NF

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+38Positivemore positive than 43% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongeffectiveclearsecureimproving
Criticismlack

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings284w+23
  • What needs to improve251w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
535
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%What needs to improve 47%

Full report text

Mrs Clare Spence Headteacher Beacon Academy Woodthorpe Road Loughborough LE11 2NF

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Beacon Academy

Following my visit to your academy on 27 February 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Beacon Academy

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in December 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Beacon Academy

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The academy should take further action to:

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Beacon Academy

 include in the academy improvement plan clear criteria to evaluate the impact of leadership at all levels on pupils’ achievement.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I held meetings with you, three other leaders and three members of the governing body, including the Vice Chair of the Governing Body. I also met with a representative of the academy sponsor. We visited almost all classes to look at the learning that was taking place. I looked at a range of documentation, including the academy’s information about pupils’ progress, a sample of pupils’ work and the academy action plan. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9153 Direct email : naik.sandhu@serco.com

p.1

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are determined to secure improvements in pupils’ achievement. Leaders have a clear sense of how and why pupils are making strong progress in writing. Using this evaluation, leaders are promoting suitable actions to accelerate pupils’ progress in reading and mathematics. Careful half-termly checks on pupils’ progress are making sure that underachievement is being tackled. Leaders acknowledge that there is still quite a way to go before a significant proportion of pupils make better than expected progress, particularly in mathematics. Improvements secured so far are, in part, as a result of extensive external support, facilitated by the academy sponsor.

p.2

Main findings

Although the academy improvement plan is rather long, it addresses the areas for improvement identified by the last academy inspection. Actions which relate to pupils’ progress include measurable criteria. However, actions linked to bringing about improvements in the effectiveness of senior and middle leaders lack clarity. It is not obvious how the governing body or the sponsor can gauge the success of leadership in improving pupils’ achievement.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the academy until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The academy is making good use of support from local schools to help teachers moderate their assessments of pupils’ progress in reading, writing and mathematics. The sponsor is providing continuing support to improve the teaching of mathematics and writing. Evaluations carried out by the sponsor help governors to hold the academy leaders to account.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children and Family Services for Leicestershire and the DfE Academies Advisers Unit.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion