Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

John Hanson Community School

Inspected 13 Feb 2014 · published 10 Mar 2014 · URN 116405

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Feb 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Graham Tuck, Margaret Faull, Paula Sargent, Roger Garrett

  • Leadership and management AI-checked

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    SP10 3PB

  • Name on report verified

    John Hanson Community School

  • URN verified

    116405

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2011.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+37Positivemore positive than 88% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progressoutstandingambitiouseffectivelyimprovedstronghighly effectiveclear
Criticismnot alwaysinadequatenot yetrequires improvementnot effectiveseriousweaknessesinconsistencies

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings472w+87
  • What needs to improve1842w+21

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,235
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 15%What needs to improve 58%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

John Hanson Community School Floral Way, Andover, Hants, SP10 3PB

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

 In some lessons, teachers are not using the information they have on their students to plan effectively in order that all students can make good progress. As a result, the most- able students and those supported by the pupil premium are not achieving as well as they could do.  Homework is not being set regularly enough for students to develop their knowledge and skills beyond the classroom.  Teachers’ marking does not always provide students with clear guidance on how their work can be improved and not enough time is given for them to act upon any advice. This means that marking is not always helping students to learn and make progress.  The achievement of students in some subjects is not yet good enough because not all subject leaders have focused sufficiently on the quality of teaching in their area and the steps they need to take to improve it.  The school’s systems for tracking students’ progress and gauging the quality of teaching

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

have been unreliable. As a result, leaders have not had a clear enough picture of what needs to change or the impact of any changes that have been made.  There are not enough opportunities for students to develop their skills in writing in subjects other than English.

p.1

The school has the following strengths

 School leaders, including the governing body, are developing a clearer picture of what needs to be done to improve the school. They are ambitious for its future success. As a result, the overall quality of teaching and the achievement of students are improving.  Some teaching is very good and, in these lessons, students flourish.  The relationship between teachers and students is very positive. Students behave well and are courteous and respectful. The school’s work to keep them safe and secure is good.  The school’s curriculum is well matched to the needs of its students and there are numerous opportunities for students to engage in sporting, artistic and cultural activities.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed parts of 35 lessons, some of which were observed jointly with members of the senior leadership team. In addition, they visited a number of lessons to look specifically at students’ homework and the quality of teachers’ marking and the extent to which these were helping students to improve.  Inspectors met with two groups of students to discuss their experience of school, and particularly their learning, behaviour and safety.  Inspectors met with seven members of the governing body and a number of groups of school leaders. They had a telephone conversation with a representative from the local authority.  Inspectors reviewed a number of documents including: minutes of the meetings of the governing body; safety procedures; behaviour and attendance records; documents relating to school self-review and improvements; reports from the local authority; and the school’s records of performance management and teaching and learning.

p.2

Information about this inspection

 In carrying out the inspection, inspectors took account of the 60 responses to the online Parent View survey and 47 questionnaires completed by staff.

p.2

Inspection team

Graham Tuck, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Margaret Faull Additional Inspector Roger Garrett Additional Inspector Paula Sargent Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 John Hanson is slightly smaller than the average-sized secondary school.  The proportion of the school’s population eligible for the pupil premium, which is additional funding provided for children in local authority care, children of service families and those known to be eligible for free school meals, is about half the national average. There are 49 children from service families currently on the school’s roll.  There are 19 students eligible for the Year 7 funded catch-up programme, which supports those students who have not previously reached the expected levels in English and mathematics.  The proportion of students from minority ethnic groups is well below the national average.  The proportion of disabled students and those who have special educational needs supported through school action and the proportion of students supported at school action plus or who have a statement of special educational needs are both below national averages.

p.3

Information about this school

 Approximately 40 Years 10 and 11 students follow additional courses at the Andover Consortium at Harrow Way, Winton Community Academy, Andover College and Sparsholt College. This is so that they can develop important skills that will be valuable to them in their future education, training and employment. In addition, 13 students attend the Andover Education Centre, 6 on medical grounds and 7 to help with aspects of their behaviour.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching in order to raise the achievement of students by ensuring that teachers:  use assessment information to plan their work so that all groups of students, including those supported by the pupil premium and the most-able students, make good progress  set regular and relevant homework that encourages students to develop their thinking and practise their skills  improve the quality of their marking so that it has a greater impact on students’ learning and progress.  Make sure that teaching is regularly monitored, particularly by subject leaders, and that the results are used to identify how teachers can improve further.  Ensure that the school’s new data tracking and monitoring systems are used to:  identify what needs to be done to improve students’ achievement  assess the impact of the measures taken, including those designed to support students eligible for the pupil premium.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Ensure that all students make better progress in developing their writing skills by applying the policy for literacy across the school.  An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how aspects of leadership and governance may be improved.

p.3

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Students join the school with levels of attainment that are in line with the national average. As a result of inconsistencies in their progress in a number of subjects, including science and the humanities, the proportion that attained five or more GCSEs at grades A* to C including English and mathematics in 2013 remained only broadly average.  Year 11 students supported by the pupil premium are not doing as well as they should and are not making the same progress in English and mathematics as other students in the school. In English, their rates of progress have improved and, as a result, the gap between their attainment and that of all other students narrowed to just under two thirds of a grade in 2013. However, in mathematics, the gap remained at over one grade. The impact of a programme to support reading through the use of Year 7 catch-up funding is not yet clear.  In lessons, the most-able students are not always provided with work that stretches and

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

challenges them and they are not always set relevant and engaging homework. As a result, their progress is not rapid enough. Over the last two years, the percentage of top grades awarded to these students has been below the national average.  Students do not have sufficient opportunities to write at length in subjects other than English and this limits the extent to which they can practise their literacy skills.  As a result of ambitious leadership and generally high quality teaching, students’ achievement in English and English literature is consistently good. In mathematics, the students’ rates of progress are improving. A small group of the most-able mathematicians sit their GCSE mathematics examination in November of Year 11: this is to enable them to move on to a more advanced mathematics course in Year 11.  Disabled students and those who have special educational needs are monitored effectively by

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

the school and receive good levels of support. This helps them to engage with their learning and progress as well as other students in the school.  Students who follow additional courses outside the school or receive help with their behaviour are carefully monitored. As a result, nearly all move on to full-time education, training or employment.  Students from minority ethnic groups, including those who speak English as an additional language, make progress that is at least in line with other students in the school.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 In a number of lessons, planning is not effective because teachers do not make good use of the assessment information that they have on their students. As a result, the work is not pitched at the appropriate level and key groups, including the most-able students and those supported by the pupil premium, do not make rapid enough progress.  While the majority of books are marked regularly, the quality of feedback that students receive is inconsistent. Students are not always given clear guidance on how they can improve their work or the teachers’ comments are preoccupied with aspects such as tidiness rather than supporting the development of the students’ skills and understanding. There are insufficient opportunities for students to think about and act upon their teachers’ advice. Homework is not being set regularly enough and so students are missing out on opportunities to develop their knowledge and skills beyond the classroom.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 A number of lessons are characterised by high levels of teachers’ subject expertise and an enthusiasm that engages the students. In a design and technology lesson, the teacher provided each student with a detailed analysis of their work to date which the students then used in planning the next steps. As a result, they were able to make outstanding progress.  Disabled students and those with special educational needs are well supported by teaching assistants who work effectively alongside classroom teachers.

p.4

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 The relationship between teachers and students is a particularly strong feature of the school. This means that when the teaching is good, students engage with their learning. They enjoy participating in such activities as group discussion and peer assessment and this helps them to make good progress in these lessons.  The behaviour of students is good. They behave well at breaks and as they move between lessons. They are courteous and respectful towards each other and towards staff and visitors. They are proud of their school and this is reflected in their smart appearance and the way that they respect the school’s buildings. After break times there is virtually no litter.  In the past, the number of fixed-term exclusions was above the national average, but over the last year the number of students excluded from school has fallen, in part because of the introduction of new systems that use exclusion as a last resort. There have been no permanent

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

exclusions.  The school’s work to keep students safe and secure is good. The atmosphere of the school is calm and friendly. Students confirmed that they feel very safe and that the rare incidents of bullying are dealt with effectively by their teachers. Students have a clear understanding of potential risks such as cyber-bullying. Almost all parents who responded to the Parent View survey agreed that their children are safe in the school.  The school has in place effective systems for the promotion of good attendance and students arrive at their lessons punctually and ready to learn. The attendance of students over time is broadly average.  The school ensures that students who attend courses at other institutions are safe and behave well. For a few students, these courses also provide them with strategies for improving their behaviour and dealing with the challenges that will face them when they return to school.

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

 Until recently, the school’s systems for tracking students’ progress and gauging the quality of teaching have been unreliable. As a consequence, leaders have been unclear about their priorities for improvement. Where initiatives have been introduced, leaders have been unable to assess their impact accurately. New systems are now in place and these have the potential to bring about improvements in both the quality of teaching and students’ achievement.  Leaders and governors are not doing enough to ensure the good progress of students eligible for the pupil premium.  Students do not do equally well in all subjects. This is because some subject leaders have not focused sufficiently on the quality of teaching in their subjects and the steps they need to take to improve it. Where middle leadership is strong, for example in English, students are engaged in their lessons and make good progress.  School leaders, including the governing body, are ambitious for the school’s success and they

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

have begun to develop a much sharper picture of what needs to be done to improve. Based on this knowledge, a well-thought-out school development plan is being used to bring about important changes. In joint observations conducted during the inspection, leaders were accurate in their judgement of teaching. There are clear links between the management of teachers’ performance, their appraisal and their pay. Responses to the staff questionnaire were positive, suggesting that staff morale is high.  The school’s curriculum is well designed to provide a variety of pathways to meet the needs of all students. In addition to traditional academic disciplines, which include the English Baccalaureate, students can follow a number of vocational subjects. Students are given helpful advice by the school and this allows them to decide on a pathway that best matches their interests and abilities.  The school is very effective in promoting students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

development. In addition to lessons in personal, social and health education, it offers a wide range of extra-curricular opportunities including sports clubs, drama and music productions and cultural trips. Students are involved in charity work and take on a number of responsibilities including supporting younger students with their reading.  The school is committed to the promotion of equality of opportunity and is a harmonious and inclusive community with high levels of mutual respect and tolerance. Almost all parents who responded to the Parent View survey confirmed that their children were happy in the school.  The school’s arrangements for safeguarding students, including those who attend classes outside the school, meet statutory requirements.  The school has received good support from its local authority learning partner in helping it to monitor its standards and improve teaching in a number of key areas, including mathematics.

p.6

The leadership and management require improvement

 The governance of the school:  Governors are prepared to challenge areas of underperformance and they know that students supported by the pupil premium are not making the same progress as other students. They bring a range of expertise to their roles and are committed to developing their skills still further. Through their scrutiny of data, such as the school’s RAISEonline report, they have a clear understanding of the quality of teaching in the school and how the school is performing compared with other similar schools and schools nationally. Governors receive regular reports on the quality of teaching and the link between this and teachers’ pay progression. They have a clear oversight of school finances and they fulfil all of their statutory duties including those relating to safeguarding.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 116405 Local authority Hampshire Inspection number 441027

p.8

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.8

School details

Type of school Secondary School category Community Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 880 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Linda Bagwell Headteacher Ian Coombs Date of previous school inspection 22–23 June 2011 Telephone number 01264 352546 Fax number 01264 339685 Email address adminoffice@jhanson.hants.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion