Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Mar 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Pamela Fearnley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Pamela Fearnley

  • Postcode verified

    DA17 6HT

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−1Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectiveimprovingstrengthsrobustcleartimelyclearly
Criticismnot alwaysat riskweaknessesinsufficientinconsistenciesnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,025
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Ian Collins Headteacher Trinity Church of England School, Belvedere Erith Road Belvedere DA17 6HT

p.1

England School, Belvedere

Following my visit to your school on 11 February 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

England School, Belvedere

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

England School, Belvedere

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

England School, Belvedere

 refine the post-Ofsted action plan to separate the responsibilities for monitoring and evaluating actions, and ensure that governors have a clear role  evaluate the quality of teaching by drawing from a wider range of evidence  ensure leaders increase the checks they make to monitor whether staff are implementing whole school priorities in a timely way. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5307 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : Rachel.evans@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, other leaders, a group of teachers and a member of the local governing body, who is also Vice Chair of the Board of the Trust Directors to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. We made brief visits to lessons to look at students’ work. I evaluated the post-Ofsted action plan and reviewed other relevant documents. I also spoke with the Chair of the Local Governing Body and an external school improvement consultant before the visit.

p.2

Context

Since the last inspection three staff with specialist subject knowledge are delivering additional English, mathematics and science lessons to targeted Key Stage 4 students. A teacher has been appointed to develop Key Stage 3 students’ literacy and numeracy skills. The heads of French and business studies have left and their roles are being covered by other middle leaders. A cross-school literacy coordinator post has been created and two teaching assistants appointed. A newly-qualified teacher has been appointed to teach French and an agency teacher is temporarily teaching religious education.

p.2

Main findings

You, your leaders and governors have responded quickly to tackle the areas for improvement highlighted in the section 5 report. The school’s post-Ofsted action plan clearly outlines the steps you are taking to make improvements and includes milestones against which you can judge the impact of your work. However, in some instances there is insufficient distinction between particular staff’s role in monitoring actions and in evaluating their impact. It is also not clear how governors will monitor and evaluate the impact of the actions.

p.2

Main findings

Staff have received training on the aspects of teaching highlighted as areas for improvement at the last inspection. A new assessment policy is improving the way teachers mark students’ written work, including their homework. Teachers are providing guidance to students about how to improve their learning and are beginning to use information about students’ progress to plan work that is matched to students’ different abilities. Nonetheless, leaders do not always check to ensure teachers are implementing changes quickly enough. As a result, inconsistencies in teachers’ practice and students’ learning remain. Teaching assistants are supporting students more effectively during lessons because teachers are sharing best practice on how to use this additional resource to improve students’ learning.

p.2

Main findings

The literacy coordinator has written a new literacy policy and quickly started to work with subject leaders and teachers to improve students’ skills in extended writing. Students are being taught new techniques and subject-specific words to improve their writing skills during lessons. You have started to help Year 11 students to improve how they prepare for examinations, through mentoring and examination skills’ training. This is being used to help those identified as at risk of underachieving to perform well under examination conditions.

p.2

Main findings

The deputy headteacher responsible for developing the quality of teaching has increased the number of lessons being observed. This is improving the accuracy of teaching records, and enables strengths to be shared and weaknesses to be tackled. Leaders understand that they need to scrutinise work in students’ books and students’ progress information, alongside learning observed in lessons to gain a robust and more accurate view of the quality of teaching. However, all of these sources of evidence are not always being used. This means judgements about the impact of teaching on students’ learning are sometimes over-generous. The new whole-school ‘tracking’ system is helping staff to make better use of information to pinpoint the progress of individuals and student groups, including those in the sixth form. This system is also helping leaders to effectively hold teachers more effectively to account for the progress of the students they teach.

p.3

Main findings

Members of the local governing body and directors of the Trust are determined to make improvements as swiftly as possible. They have visited the school on numerous occasions and reviewed the post-Ofsted action plan. Governors are in the process of commissioning external support to help them to be more objective in evaluating the impact of the school’s work.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The school uses an external consultant. She has effectively supported leaders to identify the steps they need to take to implement the priorities in the action plan. The next step is to re-focus this support from giving advice, to coaching teachers and leaders so as to strengthen their capacity to deliver the changes required for the school to become good as quickly as possible.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Local Governing Body, the Chair of the Board of the Trust Directors, the Director of Children’s Services for Bexley, the Diocese of Rochester, the Education Funding Agency, and the Academies Advisers Unit at the Department for Education.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion