Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
The Hathershaw College
Summary
Susan Wareing (lead), Alan Brine, Jane Holmes, Michael McLachlan
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
5 Feb 2014
- Inspectors verified
Alan Brine, Jane Holmes, Michael McLachlan, Susan Wareing
- Leadership and management AI-checked
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
OL8 3EP
- Name on report verified
The Hathershaw College
- URN verified
137039
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Although there are signs of improving achievement in the Year 11, the progress of students across years, including the most able and those with special educational needs, is not consistently good. p.1
- Attainment and progress in English and mathematics and several other subjects is too slow. p.1
- Teaching is improving, but it is not yet consistently good and not enough is outstanding. p.1
- When teaching is not good enough, students lose interest and very occasionally this leads to inattention and slows student progress. p.1
- Teachers do not always give students enough time to make the improvements they have advised them to make and then check that students have done so. p.1
- New appointments at senior and subject leader level have not yet had time to show impact on raising standards. p.1
- Leaders and governors, while driving some improvements, do not always plan and use progress data well enough to tackle underachievement before it becomes serious. p.1
- There is no fully developed shared view of what makes good and outstanding teaching. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,440
- shorter than usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 21%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
The Hathershaw College Bellfield Avenue, Hathershaw, Oldham, Greater Manchester, OL8 3EP
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Not previously inspected This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
Although there are signs of improving achievement in the Year 11, the progress of students across years, including the most able and those with special educational needs, is not consistently good. Attainment and progress in English and mathematics and several other subjects is too slow. Teaching is improving, but it is not yet consistently good and not enough is outstanding. When teaching is not good enough, students lose interest and very occasionally this leads to inattention and slows student progress. Teachers do not always give students enough time to make the improvements they have advised them to make and then check that students have done so. New appointments at senior and subject leader level have not yet had time to show impact on raising standards. Leaders and governors, while driving some improvements, do not always plan and use progress data well enough to tackle underachievement before it becomes serious.
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
There is no fully developed shared view of what makes good and outstanding teaching. Performance management arrangements do not always make student progress a main measure of success.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
Behaviour and safety are good. Good relationships are evident in classrooms. Students say that they feel safe in school and that bullying is dealt with effectively. Attendance has risen and exclusions have reduced significantly. Focused support in Year 7 is making a noticeable difference to students’ ability to read more fluently. Senior leaders have introduced new courses and better support that are more appropriate for the learning needs of all students. The Hearing Resource Centre makes a strong contribution to the lives and achievement of the students that it supports.
p.1
Information about this inspection
The inspection team observed 39 lessons, three of these jointly with senior leaders and managers. They also made shorter visits to some classrooms to look at other issues such as literacy support. Meetings were held with four groups of students and inspectors also spoke with students informally in lessons and around the academy. Discussions were also held with members of the governing body, senior leaders and leaders in charge of subjects or other aspects of the academy’s work. Telephone discussions were held with the Academy’s School Improvement Partner and with a member of staff from the local Pupil Referral Unit. Inspectors observed the academy’s work and examined a range of documents, including information on the checking of students’ progress and the quality of teaching, records relating to students’ behaviour and attendance and documents concerning the safeguarding of students. The inspection team also looked at systems for the performance management and professional
p.2
Information about this inspection
development of staff. They also considered the academy’s improvement plans. Only four responses were made to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) by the end of the inspection, so no analysis was available. The team considered the results of a survey of parents’ views commissioned by the academy.
p.2
Inspection team
Susan Wareing, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Jane Holmes Additional Inspector Michael McLachlan Additional Inspector Alan Brine Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
The Hathershaw College converted to academy status in August 2011. The academy forms part of the West Oldham Cooperative Trust and partners include three local primary schools, Oldham Sixth Form College and Oldham Athletic Community Trust. The academy is larger than the average-sized secondary school and serves communities from a mainly urban area of Oldham. The proportion of students who are known to be eligible for support through pupil premium funding is almost twice the national average. (Pupil premium is extra funding provided for those students known to be eligible for free school meals, those looked after by the local authority and those from service families.) Almost three quarters of students are of minority ethnic heritages and English is believed to be an additional language for around 68% of students. The proportion of students supported at school action is above average. The proportion
p.3
Information about this school
supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is also higher than usually found. One student attends part-time off-site provision at Oldham Pupil Referral Unit. A Hearing Resource Centre is based in the academy, funded by the local authority and managed by the academy’s governing body. The Centre provides specialist support in communication for nine students who are educated mainly in mainstream classes. The academy meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress in English and mathematics.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Further improve the quality of teaching by: developing a shared view of what constitutes high quality teaching ensuring that all teaching is at least good in order to develop students’ deeper understanding of and interest in all their subjects making sure that all marking gives detailed advice to students about how they may improve their work and that all teachers check that students follow up this advice and have opportunities to respond to it ensuring that lesson content is always sharply focused on speeding up the progress of all students.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Urgently raise the achievement of all students, especially the most able and some of those students with disabilities or special educational needs, so that all make expected progress, and more make more-than-expected progress.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Ensure that leaders and managers at all levels, including governors: use the academy’s very rich information on students’ progress in a better way to secure the highest levels of academic and personal achievement for all key groups of students strengthen all planning for the academy’s improvement and for the evaluation of its work, including performance management, by making students’ progress a main measure of success. An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and governance may be improved.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
An external review of the academy’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and governance may be improved.
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Many students enter the academy with levels of attainment that are well below those found nationally and their progress through the academy in English, mathematics and several other subjects, has not been fast enough over the past two years. This is particularly true in some humanities subjects, languages, design technology and physical education. Students make generally good progress in sciences. Students who join the academy with higher levels of attainment and/or with disabilities and/or special educational needs do not all make the progress of which they are capable. From low starting points, pupils who are known to be eligible for pupil premium support make broadly similar overall progress to that of others in the academy and nationally. Their attainment is broadly in line with other students in the academy. However the more able within this group do not always make the progress that they could.
p.5
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Leaders and teachers have a great deal of information about the progress already made by students and about their particular learning needs. This is not always used well to plan work that quickly moves students’ learning forward, particularly for the most able. The academy’s government-funded Year 7 Numeracy and Literacy Catch-up Programme provides good literacy support to students starting from lower points, enabling them to improve their reading ages by more than five months in a single year on average. Students know their targets, but teachers’ marking does not always give them the detailed advice that they need to know exactly how to improve their work. Students do not have enough opportunities to respond to the guidance that they do receive. As a result, they do not always achieve as much as they might over time in order to develop a strong range of skills and deep knowledge and understanding of subjects.
p.5
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
No students are entered early for GCSE examinations. The Hearing Resource Centre is a strength of the academy, making a strong contribution to the lives and achievement of the students that it supports. Some have gone on to gain pre-GCSE, GCSE and Advanced-level qualifications and take up university places. The Academy has worked hard to respond to the underachievement of some key groups of students. Senior leaders have introduced new examination courses and interventions that are more appropriate for the learning needs of all students, particularly in terms of literacy. These changes have not yet had time to show impact in external examinations. However, information held by the academy points to improving rates of expected and more than expected progress in the GCSE examinations of 2014.
p.5
The quality of teaching requires improvement
The academy has made a significant investment in the improvement of teaching. In lessons seen during the inspection around two thirds of the teaching seen was judged to be good. A few examples of outstanding teaching were also seen, but there is still too much teaching that requires improvement and a small amount of inadequate teaching also remains. Students’ attainment and progress and their work looked at during the inspection indicate that teaching over time has not been good enough to help them make good or better progress. Students learn well or better when: there are very positive relationships and when teachers have high expectations of students and of themselves; teacher’s planning is precisely focused on helping all students meet their target grades; and there is good support for the development of students’ literacy, for example through the Year 7 Catch-up Programme. Most teachers have good subject knowledge and use questioning skilfully to check on students’
p.5
The quality of teaching requires improvement
understanding. They enhance students’ learning through visiting experts. There are some high quality partnerships between teachers and teaching assistants to provide highly individualised support. Students’ progress slows when the content of lessons does not challenge them, especially the most able, and when they are given extra work, which does not help them to tackle deeper, more complex aspects of the topic. Teachers do not set a clear standard for the presentation of written work. Nor do they take account in their planning of explanations and tasks, the literacy needs of some students. Students therefore can become bored and demotivated. There is some good marking and students generally understand the levels at which they are working, but feedback is not always specific enough about what needs to improve. Many students do not have enough chances to respond to the advice given and improve their work.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
The behaviour of students is good. The academy manages behaviour well and makes consistent use of a wide range of rewards and sanctions, so that behaviour is good in lessons and around the academy. Students are articulate and confident young people. Relationships between students and teachers are very positive and students are courteous and helpful towards each other and visitors to the academy. Most students are eager to learn. Free breakfasts followed by short football sessions encourage punctuality and students arrive in lessons well-prepared for work. They take pride in their appearance and in the academy and work well together. Very occasionally, when teaching does not engage their interest, students’ concentration wanes and minor inattention occurs. Inspection evidence indicates that parents have few concerns about behaviour. Students enjoy taking responsibility, for example as members of the Academy Council, sports
p.6
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
leaders and ambassadors, or as Year 11 ‘reading buddies’ to younger students. Students say that this helps them to understand students from different age groups and that their ‘buddies’ become people they can turn to whenever they are troubled. Students treat each other with mutual respect and are proud of the academy’s diverse population. They are not merely tolerant of each other, but actively enjoy learning about each other’s faiths and values. The academy’s work to keep students safe and secure is good. The academy ensures that students, even the most vulnerable, feel and are secure in and around the site. This is confirmed in surveys of the views of parents. The academy has made strenuous efforts to improve attendance and it is now high and improving year on year. Exclusions are also reducing, but the numbers of exclusions of students with disabilities or special educational needs remain high.
p.6
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Students develop good knowledge of the different types of bullying, including cyber-bullying. Some pupils show less understanding of prejudice-based bullying. They know of little bullying in the academy, but say that it is dealt with immediately when it occurs and that it then stops very quickly.
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
The Principal and senior leaders have worked hard to establish a culture of higher expectations in the academy at a time of change. They have rightly focused on improving the quality of teaching across the academy, regularly checking this by observing lessons, examining students’ work and linking teachers’ salary progression to the effectiveness of their teaching. This has helped to increase the proportion of good teaching, but there is no routine performance target for teachers that is linked directly to the progress of key student groups. Senior leaders and governors have been slower to recognise and pre-empt students’ underperformance, for example, in English, before it has a negative impact on their progress. The academy’s improvement planning needs a sharper focus on students’ progress as the measure of success for all its actions. The Principal has built the capacity of the senior leadership team by making new appointments,
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
often from amongst the most talented middle leaders. These changes to both teams need time to show impact on raising standards. ‘We endeavour to maximise the life chances of all’ is at the heart of the academy’s mission statement. The pupil premium has funded after-school and holiday revision programmes, access to sports activities for students with special educational needs and staffing for one-to-one catch- up sessions. The academy has made frequent changes to its curriculum that provide an appropriate balance of academic and vocational subjects. Students of all abilities, therefore, have a similar range of options and there are no barriers to learning. The very low number of students who do not enter education employment or training after Year 11 shows that students are well-informed about further study and career options. Students appreciate the many opportunities to take part in a range of sports, drama and other
p.7
The leadership and management requires improvement
clubs, as well as volunteering activities. The academy makes very limited use of courses away from the academy. One student attends the Oldham Pupil Referral Unit, where procedures for keeping students safe and checking regularly on attendance and progress are very robust. The academy helps students to develop a strong sense of moral responsibility. Their social skills are well developed and they explore a range of personal and ethical issues through the Personal, Social, Health and Economic Education (PSHE) curriculum. Sports and art and design make a strong contribution to students’ cultural development, but many lessons miss opportunities to consider aspects of spiritual development. The Academy Trust fosters strong partnerships between Hathershaw College and its three primary schools. Hathershaw staff deliver a programme of French, science, sport and dance to Key Stage 2 pupils and a common Attendance Policy and Attendance Officer have improved
p.7
The leadership and management requires improvement
attendance in all Trust schools. The Hathershaw School Sports Partnership extends the opportunities for pupils to play sport at Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2. As an academy, Hathershaw College’s links with the local authority are not strong. However, training for governors was commissioned from the local authority. The academy uses external consultancy to assist in its self-evaluation and is linked with a local Teaching School in order for staff to observe outstanding teaching. The governance of the school: Some governors are relatively new to their roles but all share a range of professional expertise and experience that benefits the academy’s work. Governors are knowledgeable about the academy’s strengths and weaknesses and strongly committed to its improvement. Governors are familiar with the Data Dashboard and are deepening their understanding of other information about students’ progress. They have begun to ask more challenging questions of
p.7
The leadership and management requires improvement
the Principal and senior leaders, but were not able to act quickly on the underachievement of some key groups of students in 2013. Governors ensure that the academy’s finances are in good order and they understand how the pupil premium is spent. They are not yet fully able to analyse its impact on students’ achievement. They ensure that safeguarding arrangements meet statutory requirements, that the academy promotes equality of opportunity and that discrimination in all its forms is rejected.
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.8
School details
Unique reference number 137039 Local authority Oldham Inspection number 440911
p.9
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.9
School details
Type of school Secondary School category Academy converter Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 1,050 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Ateeque Ur-Rehman Headteacher Carol Cawkwell Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 0161 770 8555 Fax number 0161 770 8556 Email address mail@hathershaw.org.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.10
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.10
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.10
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.10
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion