Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Feb 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Russell Bennett

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Russell Bennett

  • Postcode verified

    SW6 7LN

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+59Positivemore positive than 57% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivehigh expectationsclearrigorousimprovedconfidentskilledimproving
Criticismweaknessesinconsistenciesconcernsnot clearnot precise

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
997
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Ms Sue Hayward Headteacher Sir John Lillie Primary School Lillie Road London SW6 7LN

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 6 February 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Primary School

 ensure that the recommendations from the external review of governance are fully implemented, so that governors are equipped with the skills needed to provide more effective support and challenge to school leaders  include more precise targets for the progress of different groups of pupils at each key checkpoint in the school’s action plan.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, subject and phase leaders, a representative from the local authority, the Vice Chair and two members of the Governing Body to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com The school improvement plan, documentation relating to the monitoring of teaching, governing body minutes and tracking data were scrutinised. Brief visits were made with you, to lessons in Key Stages 1 and 2.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection two permanent members of staff have been recruited. A new governor has joined the governing body. Currently, there is a vacancy for a parent governor.

p.2

Main findings

The headteacher and leaders have responded quickly to the areas for improvement identified in the last inspection. According to teachers there has been a real ‘step- change’ in the expectations of leaders. All members of the school community are clear that the progress that pupils are making needs to accelerate more quickly. There are already more rigorous and effective systems in place to monitor the quality of teaching. The headteacher and senior leaders can demonstrate the improvements that are taking place. For example, the quality of marking has improved in a relatively short space of time. Most teachers are now checking that pupils follow up on the advice they are given about how to improve their work. This is helping pupils to improve their skills and understanding. However, inconsistencies remain and leaders are taking further actions to ensure that all teachers meet the same high expectations, including for more able pupils.

p.2

Main findings

In order to identify accurately the progress that pupils are making, leaders have introduced more regular assessment checkpoints. Teachers now record information about pupils’ progress every half-term. In some cases, where underachievement is identified, even more regular assessments have been put into place. This has enabled carefully targeted interventions to be used to improve pupils’ progress. For example, leaders have rightly identified that writing in Years 5 and 6 need to improve rapidly and have already put additional resources in place to tackle this.

p.2

Main findings

Middle leaders say that they are more confident about their roles. They have received effective support from senior leaders and external consultants to ensure that they are skilled in making judgements about the quality of teaching and its impact on achievement. There are regular, scheduled observations of teachers. More frequent book checks are used to evaluate pupils’ progress over time. Middle leaders have provided support and training to teachers through team teaching and joint planning. The school’s monitoring records show that the quality of teachers’ planning and teaching is improving, as a result.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have taken action to improve the monitoring and recording of pupils’ behaviour. A new incident form is being used to track incidents, which are being analysed by senior leaders. No trends have been identified and individual concerns are followed up swiftly. The school’s tracking shows that pupils’ attendance is improving.

p.2

Main findings

Since the last inspection governors have begun to increase the level of challenge to school leaders. They have carried out an audit of their skills to identify training needs. An external review of governance has recently taken place. There are clear recommendations about how governors should improve their practice and effectiveness. The review identified how governors should scrutinise the impact of the pupil premium on achievement more regularly. Governors are aware there is much to do and are committed to making the necessary changes in order to provide more effective strategic leadership of the school. They already have a clearer understanding of the progress pupils are making and the need to ensure that teachers are held fully to account for the achievement of different groups of pupils. They are less clear about the progress pupils should be making towards more challenging targets. This is because the school’s action plan does not include precise

p.3

Main findings

milestones for pupils’ progress at each assessment checkpoint.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The school has received helpful and well-targeted support from the local authority. The school’s local authority representative has supported the headteacher in developing a more effective action plan. She has visited the school to provide support and training for middle leaders. Together with further support from an external mathematics consultant, this has strengthened middle leaders’ skills, so that they can identify strengths and weaknesses in teaching more securely. The local authority has also provided challenge to the school about its performance through ‘school improvement board’ meetings.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hammersmith and Fulham.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion