Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Kevin Sheldrick
- Postcode verified
ST16 1PW
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils are not always clear about what they must do to improve their work, in part because they are not sufficiently involved in identifying for themselves the improvements they need to make. p.2
- there is not enough and timely use of pupils’ work and other resources, so pupils can more clearly see what they must do to improve. p.2
- The school should take further action to: p.1
- These leaders are aware of the strengths and weakness in their areas of responsibility; for instance the need to use all subjects to better promote problem- solving in mathematics and ensuring more staff build effectively on the good practice that is evident in the Early Years Foundation Stage p.2
- Crucially, the Governing Body is aware of the further improvements it needs to make so that it can be even more effective. p.3
- However, there remains a need to establish effective consistent practice; for instance, there are times when progress slows because pupils cannot move quickly enough onto work that is appropriately challenging, particularly in mathematics. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 963
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 25 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Ian Goodwin Tillington Manor Primary School Young Avenue Stafford ST16 1PW
p.1
Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 10 February 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection on 3-4 December 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Primary School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
Primary School
improve pupils’ awareness of the next steps in learning through, the more effective use of pupils work to highlight excellent practice. accelerate the progress pupils make in lessons by ensuring they can concentrate more on activities they find challenging, particularly in mathematics. monitor more closely the reading being undertaken by pupils and take steps to ensure all groups read more often and more widely. involve the Governing Body more in determining the precise targets that can be used by governors to regularly check on the improvements being made in every year group, particularly for those pupils eligible for free school meals Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9166 Direct email : helen.johnson@serco.com
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you and other leaders, three members of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority. The school improvement plan, information related to the tracking of pupils’ progress and the minutes of the governing body meetings were evaluated. Short visits were made to ten lessons to observe teaching
p.2
Context
There have been no changes in context since the last Section 5 inspection.
p.2
Main findings
You are establishing a more effective approach to the teaching of letters and sounds (phonics). This is an important recognition that too many pupils, particularly those eligible for pupil premium, have not met the national expectations in the recent past. The benefits of this were particularly apparent in the writing and reading seen in the Reception class. The plans you are implementing to plug the gaps in the phonics knowledge of pupils in Key Stage 2 are appropriate. The school does not yet have enough information about the success of the strategies it is using to encourage pupils of all abilities, to read more often and more widely
p.2
Main findings
You are developing an increased awareness of what is required to ensure all pupils make good progress in lessons. It was reassuring to hear that you intend to increase the checks that are made following professional development activity to ensure all staff improve their practice. You have correctly recognised that there are strengths in emphasising the identification of targets for individual pupils and that staff are making some adjustments to their teaching in response to this. Teachers often focus their explanations only on the groups that would benefit from this and some steps are taken to match work to the different abilities. However, there remains a need to establish effective consistent practice; for instance, there are times when progress slows because pupils cannot move quickly enough onto work that is appropriately challenging, particularly in mathematics. Progress in lessons also slows because
p.2
Main findings
there is not enough and timely use of pupils’ work and other resources, so pupils can more clearly see what they must do to improve. Pupils are not always clear about what they must do to improve their work, in part because they are not sufficiently involved in identifying for themselves the improvements they need to make.
p.2
Main findings
The leaders responsible for English, mathematics and the Early Years Foundation Stage spoke confidently about the commitment all staff have to becoming good teachers. These leaders are aware of the strengths and weakness in their areas of responsibility; for instance the need to use all subjects to better promote problem- solving in mathematics and ensuring more staff build effectively on the good practice that is evident in the Early Years Foundation Stage
p.2
Main findings
Improvement plans address all the issues identified at the section 5 inspection and contain some indicators that can be used to check the progress being made improving the school. The Governing Body is using performance management well to hold senior leaders to account. Crucially, the Governing Body is aware of the further improvements it needs to make so that it can be even more effective. Governors have a good understanding of the how well the school is doing at Year 2 and Year 6 compared to schools nationally. However, they are not as confident about judging performance in other year groups, particularly for those eligible for pupil premium funding.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The school is working with other local schools so that it has increased access to very good and outstanding practice elsewhere. The local authority has organised appropriate consultant support for mathematics and has also identified a further partner school. It would be helpful if the support from the partner school could focus on further improving the effectiveness of monitoring and evaluation activity. The local authority has usefully established regular opportunities to review the progress the school is making. It has agreed to keep HMI informed about the outcomes of these reviews.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services Staffordshire.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion