Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Julie Winyard
- Postcode verified
NR10 3LF
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 798
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 24 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 27%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Katherine Thompson Headteacher St Faith's CofE Primary School 25 Manor Road Horsham St Faith Norwich NR10 3LF
p.1
Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 7 February 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Primary School
Senior leaders and governors are not taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection. The school’s action plan is still not fully in place and is too complicated. Neither staff nor governors have been involved in the process of creating the plan. It has taken far too long to produce a working document to move the school to good. The school should take immediate action to:
p.1
Primary School
Make sure staff and governors are fully involved in deciding what actions will make a real difference to addressing the key issues from the section 5 inspection. Make sure that you, with the staff, regularly evaluate and update the action plan to reflect progress against the key issues. Make sure that governors are kept fully informed of the progress the school is making. Make sure that you drive improvement and helps staff understand the part they have to play in bringing this about. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 01216 799162 Direct email : siobhan.garrattley@serco.com Make sure that you take the lead in helping staff and governors understand the progress pupils are making.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, the other senior leader, the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school action plan was evaluated. We observed a sample of lessons from all teachers, some with a representative of the local authority at the school’s request. We looked at pupils’ books during lessons and some of the school’s recent evaluation of pupils’ progress.
p.2
Context
Since the section 5 inspection a teacher and a teaching assistant are on sickness leave.
p.2
Main findings
You have taken too long to finalise the action plan following the section 5 inspection. As a result, staff and governors do not have a clear understanding about how to make the required improvements. This was evident in our observations of teaching because not all teachers are assessing pupils’ knowledge and understanding accurately. This means activities do not always provide enough challenge to the most able or support for those who need extra help. There is inconsistency in the quality of pupils’ written work in mathematics and English. This is because teachers do not always set high enough expectations and as a result pupils do not take enough pride in their work. The teachers have not had sufficient training on assessment or marking and do not always set an example through the quality of their written comments. There is no whole-school approach to marking and although some pupils’ are given clear instructions about how to improve their work this is not
p.2
Main findings
You have made some changes, but it is not clear how these have led to improvement. For example, you have started to group pupils for phonics (the sounds letters make) but the activities are not always helping pupils to read or spell better. You have recently bought new reading books so pupils have a wider choice of suitable books, but have not evaluated the impact of this on improving pupils’ interest in and enjoyment of reading.
p.2
Main findings
The governors have a very precise understanding of what the school must do to improve but they are not well enough informed about how you and the staff are going to bring about the required improvements.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The local authority is giving the school a good level of support. The improvement group chaired by the school’s intervention adviser has given good support to the governors. However the local authority audit of the school, carried out just before the last section 5 inspection, is an overgenerous account of the school’s strengths and points for improvement.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Norfolk local authority and the Diocese of Norwich.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion