Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Feb 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Judith Matharu

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Judith Matharu

  • Postcode verified

    DY1 2DU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+43Positivemore positive than 46% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositivegood progresseffectivesecure
Criticismat risk

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings723w+43
  • What needs to improve88w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
798
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 29, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 89%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr G Lloyd Principal The Holly Hall Academy Scotts Green Close Dudley DY1 2DU

p.1

alternative provision

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 5 and 6 February 2014 to look at the academy’s use of alternative provision.

p.1

alternative provision

During the visit I met with you and a number of your senior colleagues who have responsibility for alternative provision. I met with 12 students and examined a range of documents. I also visited the following providers that your students attend: Black Country Wheels, Nova Training and The Cherry Tree Learning Centre.

p.1

alternative provision

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

alternative provision

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 You know your students well and have considered alternative placements thoughtfully with due regard to both students’ and parents’ and carers’ wishes. A small number of local placements have been carefully selected which provide a suitable range of vocational options for a relatively small group of students, including those with acute medical needs, those in need of re-engagement or to improve students’ motivation for learning. You are responsive to feedback from students; there are instances where placements have been changed when students indicate that things are not working out as hoped.  Good attention is paid to meet individual needs and circumstances and secure alternative provision with the potential to provide continuing pathways post-16. The outcomes of this are impressive; for example, of those students engaged in alternative provision last year, all have progressed into further training or employment related to their

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

placements.  Importantly, off-site providers are selected because they offer a suitable range of vocational accreditations. Of last year’s cohort of students, all achieved at least one vocational qualification and a significant number obtained several qualifications.  The academy wisely places considerable emphasis on the importance of students securing the highest possible grades in GCSE English and mathematics. By placing alternative provision in an option block, which, for the vast majority of students results in one day per week spent out of school, this allows them to continue their studies in the core subjects during the remainder of the week. This also ensures that a balanced curriculum is retained. Students themselves understand the importance of continuing to improve their literacy and numeracy skills in terms of their future employability.  On last year’s programme, two students gained a GCSE grade C in

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

mathematics and all gained a Grade D to G in English and mathematics, together with a range of Level 1 vocational qualifications. For most of these students, this represented good progress, given their starting points and the considerable barriers to learning that many of them faced. Current students are making similar progress.  The alternative provision settings are housed in suitable accommodation with good facilities and all provide a positive learning environment for your students. Effective learning was evident in the three settings visited. Safeguarding is given suitably high priority and attention. You support students well; for example, completing travel training with students on alternative provision to encourage confidence in travelling to their placements. The achievement and progress of students is carefully tracked and reported upon by both the alternative providers and yourselves. Your

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

tracking of progress indicates considerable success in re-engaging a number of young people who were at risk of alienation from education and/or exclusion from the academy.  The academy evaluates a range of evidence to judge the impact of alternative provision on students’ personal and social development; for example, attendance, participation in lessons, behaviour logs, rewards and sanctions received by students, feedback from staff and students themselves and comments received from parent and carers. Overall, your records indicate that this type of intervention makes a significantly positive impact on many students’ personal and social skills.  Students are generally highly positive about their placements and can identify the range of skills and aptitudes that they are developing. In particular, they comment favourably on the vocational qualifications they are gaining and the potential impact on their future employability.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 recording the outcomes of the various monitoring activities undertaken more formally and increasing the monitoring of and support provided for any students in full time alternative provision

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that all placements receive a full written profile of each student’s abilities, needs, aptitude and behaviour prior to the placement commencing

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that all providers are provided with written information about the academy’s child protection and safeguarding policies and making sure that the governing body take account of off-site provision when reviewing the effectiveness of safeguarding procedures.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion