Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Feb 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ian McNeilly

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ian McNeilly

  • Postcode verified

    NG9 2AT

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−1Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivesuccessfullyimprovedclearlyconsistent
Criticismweaknessesslownot yetnot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

Simon Thompson John Clifford Primary School Nether Street Beeston Nottingham NG9 2AT

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 11 February 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in December 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Primary School

 amend the school improvement plan so that it lists actions, milestones and staff responsible for monitoring and evaluating actions more clearly  ensure the improvements made in marking and in the presentation of pupils’ work are consistent across the school  successfully address the slow pace of some lessons, particularly those in guided reading

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, three members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the school improvement action Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 6799169 Direct email : mathew.mitchell@serco.com plan. You took me on a tour of the school and we made brief visits to a range of classes.

p.1

Context

There have been no changes in staff since your recent inspection.

p.2

Main findings

There is a wide range of activity underway to address the areas for improvement identified by your most recent inspection.

p.2

Main findings

You now carry out initial assessments of pupils’ ability after two weeks rather than waiting until the next scheduled test. This has improved your tracking of the progress made by the many pupils you have who join the school at different points of the year.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers now all use a common lesson planning document which requires that the needs of individual pupils are met, particularly the most able. You have conducted interviews with pupils to find out their opinions on whether lessons are too easy or too difficult, and this helps your teachers choose more appropriate tasks.

p.2

Main findings

All teachers have been formally observed since the inspection and each has been given areas for development which link to necessary improvements identified by your recent inspection. Increasing the pace of some lessons is a priority.

p.2

Main findings

Your recently introduced marking policy has led to improvements in this area, and in the presentation of pupils’ work. However, this is not yet consistent across the school. ‘Response time’ has been introduced to numeracy lessons so that pupils have better opportunities to engage with the feedback teachers give them. You plan to extend this to literacy lessons soon. Your teachers, and those of two local infant schools, have shared best practice in marking.

p.2

Main findings

You have identified teachers who require support in providing opportunities for pupils to apply number skills in a wide range of contexts. This aspect is now emphasised in teachers’ planning requirements.

p.2

Main findings

Greater consistency in the teaching of letters and sounds is developing by directing all teachers to use a standardised grid for planning lessons. These documents are checked by school leaders to ensure they are of a good quality. Three teachers benefited from phonics training which was then shared across the school’s staff. In school data show an improvement in the phonics achievement of Year 1 pupils.

p.2

Main findings

Governors are well aware of the challenges facing the school. Shortly after the recent inspection, the governing body met to discuss the school’s areas for improvement. They were involved in the revisions made to the school’s development plan, and are taking an active part in holding the school leaders to account for its implementation. Seven governors attended meetings to help convey the inspection findings to parents.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority representative began working with the school in November and already has a good knowledge of the school and its needs. She has arranged support from a well-regarded local school. The representative has also carried out a scrutiny of pupils’ work with the school’s leaders of literacy and numeracy, and suggested areas for their development in terms of identifying weaknesses when evaluating teaching.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Nottinghamshire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion