Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Feb 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Pamela Fearnley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Pamela Fearnley

  • Postcode verified

    CR0 5EF

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−47Criticalmore positive than 8% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedeffective
Criticismat risknot alwayslimitednot clearnot precise

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,024
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Nigel Barrow Headteacher Shirley High School Performing Arts College Shirley Church Road Croydon CR0 5EF

p.1

Performing Arts College

Following my visit to your school on 29 January 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Performing Arts College

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Performing Arts College

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Performing Arts College

 include more precision in its post-Ofsted plan about how leaders will monitor the actions to which they are linked  strengthen the arrangements for developing literacy across the school and for monitoring and evaluating its impact.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, other leaders, a group of teachers, the Chair of the Governing Body and two other governors to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I spoke with the Principal of Hayes High School, who is a National Leader of Education (NLE). I made brief visits to lessons with you and a Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5307 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : Rachel.evans@tribalgroup.com deputy headteacher to look at students’ work. I evaluated the post-Ofsted action plan and reviewed other relevant documents.

p.1

Context

The responsibilities of the senior team have been extended to be more closely linked to the areas for improvement identified in the last inspection. Three teachers are undertaking some leadership responsibilities, so that one of the assistant headteachers can develop the use of the pupil premium funding. The school has appointed a new Chair and Vice Chair of the Governing Body. A student support assistant has left and been replaced.

p.2

Main findings

You, your senior leaders and governors have rapidly introduced key changes to tackle the areas for improvement outlined in the last inspection. This is reflected in the school’s action plan, which has measureable success criteria to assess its impact of actions on the progress made by different groups of pupils. However, deadlines for actions to be completed and monitored are not stated. This limits leaders’ capacity to hold staff to account.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers’ marking is providing guidance for students about how to improve their learning which is a change since the last inspection. Teachers are looking more closely at students’ responses to their marking and using this to assess their progress. Staff are receiving training and coaching in the use of new teaching approaches to improve students’ learning. However, work for the most able students is not always sufficiently challenging.

p.2

Main findings

The use of information to track the progress of individuals and student groups, including those eligible for pupil premium funding, has improved. This is because half-termly meetings have been introduced for leaders, including those in the sixth form, to meet with staff, to discuss students’ progress and agree what changes are needed to improve teaching. Additional support for students at risk of not reaching their targets is also identified at these meetings. This is supporting teachers in using students’ assessment information to target and address those at risk of underperforming in their subjects, including in mathematics.

p.2

Main findings

A member of the senior leadership team has produced an action plan to ensure the school’s pupil premium funding is targeted to support students in Year 7 to Year 11. As a result, teachers are now more able to target their teaching to improve the learning of these students in lessons and provide any additional support for them. In addition, the heads of year and student form tutors are involved in putting targeted support in place for these students, if they are at risk of underachieving in any subjects.

p.2

Main findings

You and other leaders have begun to implement a range of initiatives to develop students’ literacy skills. Nonetheless, the impact of this work has been limited. This is because teachers are not always clear about which are the priority initiatives; and leaders have not been given precise information to help them assess the impact on students’ learning. Weekly lesson observations, completed by senior and middle leaders, assess the quality of teaching across the school and in the sixth form. Information from lesson observations is now used to target teachers who require support to improve their practice and to inform teachers’ in-service training.

p.3

Main findings

The commitment and determination of the governing body to improve the school is shown by meeting on four separate occasions since the last inspection. An external review of governance has been completed and governors have drawn up an improvement plan. They show an improved understanding of how pupil premium funding is used and its impact on students’ achievement. A governor has also been appointed to oversee the impact of the pupil premium funding. A group of governors is being identified to hold leaders to greater account for the quality of information about students’ progress. The impact of the school’s post-Ofsted actions will be evaluated by governors supported by the Principal of Hayes High School.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

You have commissioned the support of NLEs, a National Leader of Governance and external consultants to help you quickly drive improvement. Since the last inspection, the Principal of Hayes High School has made six visits to the school. These visits have been focussed on helping leaders to write the post-Ofsted action plan and advising the governing body on their contribution to school improvement. External support is also being used well to validate leaders’ judgements about the quality of teaching

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Education Funding Agency and the Director of Children’s Services for Croydon.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion