Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Jan Connor
- Postcode verified
NN2 7AJ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 867
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Claire Dunstan Headteacher All Saints CofE VA Primary School Boughton Green Road Kingsthorpe Northampton NN2 7AJ
p.1
Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 29 January 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Primary School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, the deputy headteacher, other senior leaders, the Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated. During the visit, you joined me on a tour of the school where I spoke informally with pupils and asked them about their work. I scrutinised a selection of pupils’ books with you and the deputy headteacher. I also scrutinised additional school information. I reviewed the single central record.
p.1
Context
Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 01216 799162 Direct email : siobhan.garrattley@serco.com Since the last inspection one teacher has retired. There is an acting Early Years Foundation Stage leader to cover the long-term sickness of the substantive leader. One governor has resigned and another left at the end of her term of office.
p.1
Main findings
It is clear that you and the deputy headteacher are determined to bring about school improvement rapidly. Your plans to tackle the issues raised at your last inspection are clear and measureable. Timescales for improvement are sharp and demonstrate that you expect teachers to act quickly to improve outcomes for pupils. The governors’ role in holding you to account for improved outcomes is clearly visible in your plans.
p.2
Main findings
You have quickly identified the strengths and weaknesses in the quality of teaching in different classes. You plan professional development that is matched precisely to meet teachers’ needs. You expect them to develop quickly and improve their work. Systems for checking the quality of teaching are robust. Consequently, there is a growing understanding amongst staff that you are holding them to account for the progress made by pupils and teaching is improving quickly. However, there is still some inadequate teaching that has not been eradicated and this is having a detrimental impact on the progress of some pupils.
p.2
Main findings
Teachers now plan lessons much more precisely to meet the needs of different groups of pupils. Closing gaps in learning is a high priority, although progress in some classes is still slower than others. You are resolute in your commitment to resolve this. There are some good examples of high quality marking where pupils respond to the challenges their teachers set them. However, this is inconsistent and not all pupils receive the same level of challenge.
p.2
Main findings
Your middle leaders have become better skilled in identifying areas for development in their subjects. They know what the strengths and weaknesses are. Consequently, they are challenging colleagues to improve their teaching and the progress pupils make is improving. You are providing middle leaders with training and opportunities to visit good practice in other schools. They are now bringing this good practice back into school and improving the quality of teaching in their subjects. As a result, leadership within your school is better distributed. Key messages about improvements in pupil outcomes are beginning to be embedded across the school through the wider leadership.
p.2
Main findings
The governing body has responded well to the challenge of improving the school. It is clear governors are growing more confident to challenge senior leaders. They expect you to provide them with detailed reports about the strengths and weaknesses in teaching and they are holding you to account for your actions. Governors are linked closely with developments in school through regular meetings with subject leaders as well as senior leaders and this is having a positive outcome because governors know the school much better. An external review of governance has taken place. Governors have already acted upon the recommendations to improve their effectiveness. However, governors do not have fully developed systems to check the impact of senior leaders’ actions to improve the school independently.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The local authority has acted promptly to provide effective support for the school. It quickly identified a National Leader of Governance to carry out the governing body review. It has also supported the school to develop closer links with local schools so that leaders benefit from expertise in good schools. It has also funded training for professional development.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Northampton.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion