Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 19 Feb 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jonathan Brown

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jonathan Brown

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+57Positivemore positive than 55% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehighly effectiveeffectiverobustimprovingstrongeffectivelysuccessfulsuccessfully
Criticisminconsistenciesinconsistencynot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566855 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: gail.hill@cfbt.com

p.1

Miss Rebecca Cradock Headteacher Clayton Village Primary School John Street Clayton Bradford West Yorkshire BD14 6AD

p.1

School, Bradford

Following my visit to your school on 29 January 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School, Bradford

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School, Bradford

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School, Bradford

 ensure longer term planning is developed, detailing the actions required for the school to become good

p.1

School, Bradford

 secure the accuracy of teacher assessments, particularly in reading

p.1

School, Bradford

 ensure current staffing difficulties are resolved quickly and effectively.

p.1

Evidence

During my visit, I had conversations with you and your senior leaders, members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. I also spoke with a linked headteacher from a successful local school who is providing advice and support to you. The schools’ plan for improvement was evaluated. A brief visit to all classrooms in the school was undertaken. I also looked at work in pupils’ books.

p.1

Context

The school has had a change in headteacher since the last inspection. The current headteacher has been in post since the start of the term.

p.2

Main findings

You and your staff have made a highly effective start to getting your school to good. This is because you have built on the work started by the previous headteacher, sharpened the focus of that work and successfully engaged key people in the process. You and your predecessor have planned well to ensure a smooth transition and maintain a rapid rate of implementation.

p.2

Main findings

Your plans for improving the school are detailed with precise actions that are currently being implemented. Required actions are identified and the impact of some are already evident. Governors have a good understanding about their responsibility for checking the progress being made within the plan. It has challenging targets and milestones to measure the impact of actions in the long term but does not yet have clarity about when the school expects to be good and what further actions may be required to get there.

p.2

Main findings

You have started a comprehensive and timely self-evaluation of the school which is already informing your next steps. You have reviewed teaching and established a robust view of its quality, and have given feedback to staff. You have identified some inconsistencies in the assessments made by teachers of pupils learning. You have begun to address this inconsistency with urgency but further work is still required, particularly with assessments in reading.

p.2

Main findings

There has been an initial focus on the marking of pupils’ work to accelerate their learning. The introduction of an ‘editing and improving time’ at the start of the day has already impacted on the work seen in pupils’ books. You have been rigorous and swift in taking action to support improvement in teachers’ practice. The school timetable has been redrafted to maximise opportunities for teaching and learning.

p.2

Main findings

Ensuring teaching is at least good and tackling under performance where it exists is a priority. School leaders recognise the challenges that this brings and have robust monitoring procedures in order to maintain this focus. Some staffing issues are impacting on the schools’ ability to embed best practice however there is a strong commitment to resolve any remaining issues.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body has a clear understanding of what the school needs to do to improve. This is because they have been fully involved in overseeing and contributing to the plans for improvement. Since the inspection they have established a new committee structure including a school improvement committee with a clear brief to monitor and evaluate progress against the school action plan. A monthly monitoring visit is now undertaken with the support of members of staff. Governors, school leaders and local authority officers have a joint review programme every half term to keep a tight watching brief on the progress the school is making. Governors recognise the need to build their own capacity and a review of governance has been planned. Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The local authority is providing effective support for the school. They know the school well and participate in a review group with governors and the headteacher to measure progress since the inspection.

p.3

External support

You have established additional external support with the help of the local authority. A consultant has done intensive work with teachers on improving writing across the school. You have also established a programme of visits with a good school to share best practice. This partnership work has included reviewing classroom learning environments and additional support for school leadership teams. A detailed plan for how this work is to be developed is now in place.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Bradford.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion