Summary
Michael Wintle (lead), Edward Price, Jane Salt
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
29 Jan 2014
- Inspectors verified
Edward Price, Jane Salt, Michael Wintle
- Postcode verified
DN2 4JP
- Name on report verified
Park Primary School
- URN verified
106728
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.7
- They thrive on the school’s warmth and friendliness and from the strong sense of community it has nurtured. p.5
- Pupils in Years 5 and Year 6 are presently achieving well because teaching is consistently good and often outstanding. p.1
- The headteacher, supported well by the staff and governors, is taking a strong lead in improving the quality of teaching and learning. p.1
- The strong leadership of the headteacher, ably supported by the deputy headteacher and the governing body, provides clear direction for the school. p.6
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.7
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.7
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils’ achievement varies too much across the school, particularly in mathematics. p.1
- Not enough pupils make more than the expected progress from their starting points. p.1
- The quality of teaching is not consistently good across the school. p.1
- The most able pupils are not always given work that is hard enough to enable them to fulfil their potential. p.1
- Teaching assistants are not always directed well enough so that they can assist pupils’ learning. p.1
- Teachers’ expectations regarding pupils’ progress and what they can achieve are sometimes too low. p.1
- Pupils’ work is often too hard or too easy. p.1
- Teachers’ marking does not help pupils to know what they need to do to improve their work. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,645
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 16%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
P R O T E C T – I N S P E C T I O N School report
p.1
Park Primary School Monmouth Road, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN2 4JP
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
Pupils’ achievement varies too much across the school, particularly in mathematics. Not enough pupils make more than the expected progress from their starting points. The quality of teaching is not consistently good across the school. The most able pupils are not always given work that is hard enough to enable them to fulfil their potential. Teaching assistants are not always directed well enough so that they can assist pupils’ learning. Teachers’ expectations regarding pupils’ progress and what they can achieve are sometimes too low. Pupils’ work is often too hard or too easy. Teachers’ marking does not help pupils to know what they need to do to improve their work. Pupils across the school are not always provided with regular opportunities to develop their problem-solving skills in mathematics. Some documents and evaluations are not yet sufficiently precise to easily identify the school’s priorities.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
The headteacher, supported well by the staff and governors, is taking a strong lead in improving the quality of teaching and learning. Pupils in Years 5 and Year 6 are presently achieving well because teaching is consistently good and often outstanding. Pupils develop positive attitudes to learning. They behave well in lessons and around school. Pupils feel safe and like their school. Parents are overwhelmingly supportive of the school’s work. Reading is the most successful aspect of pupils’ learning. They enjoy reading and use their skills to help them learn in other subjects. The governing body understands how well the school is doing and holds leaders to account effectively. The curriculum is much livelier than it was two years ago. Pupils enjoy visits and finding out things for themselves. They have many opportunities to enrich their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development.
p.1
Information about this inspection
The inspectors observed 22 lessons, three of which were observed jointly with the headteacher and deputy headteacher. All classes were seen at least once. Meetings were held with senior and subject leaders, representatives of the governing body, and groups of Year 6 pupils. A representative from the local authority was contacted by telephone. Inspectors reviewed the school’s website. Inspectors looked at a range of documents including the school’s evaluation of its own performance, the school’s own data on pupils’ achievement, minutes of meetings of the governing body, planning and monitoring records, and the records of how the school uses its funding, especially how money from pupil premium and primary school sport funding is spent. Records relating to behaviour and attendance and documents relating to safeguarding were also taken into consideration. They analysed the 16 responses to the online questionnaire (Parent View) and a parent
p.2
Information about this inspection
questionnaire that the school has undertaken this year. Inspectors took into account the views of a number of parents spoken to during inspection. There were 24 responses returned by members of staff and taken into account by inspectors.
p.2
Inspection team
Michael Wintle, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Jane Salt Additional Inspector Edward Price Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
This is larger than the average-sized primary school. The proportion of pupils supported through the pupil premium funding is well above average. The pupil premium is additional funding for those pupils who are known to be eligible for free school meals, children from service families, and those children looked after by the local authority. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups is above average. Pupils come from a wide range of backgrounds and heritages. The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs supported through school action is broadly average. The proportion of pupils supported at school action plus or who have a statement of special educational needs is broadly average. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress. The headteacher has been in post for three and a half years.
p.3
Information about this school
A much higher proportion of pupils than is usual join or leave the school at times other than the start of the school year.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Further improve the quality of teaching so that it is always at least good in order to accelerate pupils’ progress, particularly in mathematics, by: refining approaches to marking pupils’ work so that teachers’ comments focus on improvement and pupils respond accordingly making sure work is always hard enough for the different groups of pupils in the class ensuring that teaching assistants are used well across the whole lesson so that pupils make even quicker progress providing regular opportunities for pupils of all abilities to solve problems and develop their mathematical skills in lessons building on the work already started to ensure that all pupils have regular and sufficient opportunities to use and apply their mathematical skills for a variety of purposes and in a wide range of subjects sharing the good and outstanding teaching in the school.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Further strengthen the effectiveness of the leadership and management, by: ensuring that information about what the school is doing is more precise so that it is clearer to all staff and governors which actions are being the most successful and which areas need further improvement.
p.3
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Achievement requires improvement because the progress that pupils make is not always good enough across the school to ensure that they all reach the levels of attainment of which they are capable. While many pupils make the expected progress, too few make better than expected progress, particularly in mathematics. Achievement requires improvement because progress is not yet consistently good across all year groups and subjects, especially in mathematics. In part, this is because of weaker teaching in the past. However, strong leadership is bringing about improvements in its quality. This is helping pupils in all year groups to make faster progress, especially in reading and writing. Pupils now do better in reading and writing because teaching in these subjects is usually more effective in helping them to learn and make progress. In mathematics, pupils of all abilities do not have enough chances to solve problems and develop their mathematical skills and, as a
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
result, they make slower progress. Children start school in the Early Years Foundation Stage with skills that are well below those typical for their age. They settle quickly in nursery and make a good start to their learning. Progress is good in their personal and social development because the children feel safe and enjoy being at school. However, sometimes the planned activities for them are too easy or too hard. By the time they start in Year 1, most pupils are still working at below average standards. In Key Stage 1, pupils continue to make steady progress and, by the end of Year 2, standards in reading and mathematics are broadly average and slightly above average in writing. By the end of Year 6, however, most pupils’ attainment in English and mathematics is below the level expected for their age. In mathematics, standards have been below average for a number of years. It is clear that current pupils’ progress is improving but there is still more to be done to
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
help some pupils catch up, especially in mathematics. The large numbers of pupils who join or leave the school other than at the usual times and who are new to learning English settle into school life quickly and, as a result, soon begin to make similar progress to their peers from their own individual starting points. The most able pupils make expected rather than good progress and, therefore, do not always reach the standards of which they are capable, especially in mathematics. This is because sometimes teachers do not challenge them with work that is hard enough throughout the lessons and so time is wasted repeating work they can already do. In Key Stage 1, the teaching of phonics (letters and the sounds they make) provides pupils with a firm start in their reading. Pupils say they enjoy reading and talk eagerly about their books. One Year 2 pupil said to one inspector that, ‘I love reading because it’s important.’
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
At the end of Year 6 in 2013, pupils eligible for the pupil premium, including those known to be eligible for free school meals, were behind their classmates in English and mathematics by over one term’s progress. School data and inspection evidence show that current pupils who are eligible for the pupil premium are now on track to match the attainment of their classmates in reading, writing and in mathematics in all year groups because of better teaching. Despite not providing fully for the most able, the school is committed to equal opportunities and provides effective support, particularly on a one-to-one level, to ensure that those pupils identified for support through school action, school action plus and those with a statement of special educational needs make at least expected progress in relation to their starting points. Pupils in Year 5 and Year 6 are presently achieving well because teaching is consistently good
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
and often outstanding. In a literacy lesson, excellent teaching meant all pupils were able to comment successfully on figurative and literal language. Pupils’ engagement was very high and their progress was rapid. Improvements in the curriculum are having a positive impact on pupils’ writing skills. Visits to places of historical interest such as Eden Camp, for example, provide pupils with memories and ideas to include in their extended writing. Year 6 pupils speak fondly of such experiences.
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Not enough of the teaching is consistently good. This means that pupils do not always achieve as well as they could. Nevertheless, inspection evidence indicates that teaching is improving. During this inspection, much of the teaching seen was good and a small amount was outstanding. However, there is too much variation in the way pupils’ skills are developed and extended. Pupils do not have enough opportunities to develop their mathematical skills. This is because they do not tackle problems which make them think deeply about mathematics and this slows their learning. Teachers’ expectations of what pupils can do and achieve, especially the most able pupils, are often not high enough. Too many teachers set tasks that are either the same or similar for all pupils. This means that work is too simple for some and too hard for others. This explains why not enough pupils reach the expected standards at the end of Year 6, especially in mathematics.
p.5
The quality of teaching requires improvement
In some lessons, pupils are busy and enthusiastic. This was so in a Year 1 lesson on literary tales. Effective questioning by the teacher encouraged pupils to be fully involved with their learning. The pace was swift and all pupils clearly enjoyed the class discussions. When they mark work, teachers’ comments often do not inform pupils precisely how they can improve. Some books show simple comments repeated several times, with no sign that the pupil has responded to the advice given. Too many comments in mathematics books relate to presentation and handwriting and do not help to deepen pupils’ mathematical thinking. Pupils have good opportunities to write across different subjects. Work completed in upper Key Stage 2 on the Egyptians and displayed showed pupils using mature vocabulary when they were learning about the tomb of Cleopatra. There were links between art, literacy, information and
p.5
The quality of teaching requires improvement
communication technology, and history. In mathematics, there are fewer opportunities for pupils to apply their mathematical skills in different subjects. The use of teaching assistants to deliver specific support programmes and to support learning in the classroom is good. Teaching assistants are used highly effectively in some lessons, but this is not always the case. Lessons were often lively and well structured, providing pupils with good opportunities to discuss their ideas. Pupils in a religious education lesson, for example, were encouraged to think deeply about the Christian ethos and how it is exemplified in everyday life. Pupils were very engaged and able to reflect and change their viewpoints as they found out more.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils are polite and behave well throughout the school, resulting a in a calm and friendly learning environment. Pupils enjoy school and, as a result, their attendance is improving to a shade below average. They thrive on the school’s warmth and friendliness and from the strong sense of community it has nurtured. Pupils say they are well supported in their learning and trust their teachers. The Junior Leadership Team meets regularly with members of staff to make sure pupils’ views are heard. One pupil said, ‘The headteacher and deputy headteacher listen a lot to what we have to say.’ The school’s work to keep pupils safe and secure is good. Pupils say they feel safe. This is because they have formed trusting relationships with all staff. Pupils understand that bullying can happen in a range of ways, including through mobile phones. They say that there is no
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
bullying in the school and are confident that, if incidents occur, the school would deal quickly with it. Parents express positive views about the school. Overwhelmingly, parents agree that the school keeps children safe and that behaviour is good. Assemblies, class debate, links with the local schools and the many opportunities for pupils to work together contribute well to their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development, which is given strong emphasis. Pupils have positive attitudes to learning.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
The strong leadership of the headteacher, ably supported by the deputy headteacher and the governing body, provides clear direction for the school. The rigorous programme of checks on the quality of teaching and learning taking place has started to secure improvements in the quality of teaching and pupils’ achievement. Decisions about staff pay rates are based solely on the quality of teaching. The leadership team has an accurate view of the school’s strengths and areas to develop. The plans for improvement correctly indicate the main priorities for the school. The headteacher is clear about how actions will improve the quality of teaching and pupils’ achievement. However, some of the information in the school improvement plans and the school’s self-evaluation as a whole lacks precision in clearly identifying the impact of actions to improve provision. This makes it difficult for staff and governors to gain a quick overview of which actions are being the most,
p.6
The leadership and management are good
or the least, successful. School leaders recognised the need to extend the leadership and management responsibilities and introduced a programme to achieve this. This programme has been successful and leadership is now growing in confidence and all staff are regularly checking on the progress pupils make in all subjects. A significant innovation is a rigorous system for checking pupils’ progress that allows the school to carefully analyse how well different groups of pupils are doing. This valuable analysis provides the school with a clear picture of the progress of pupils receiving the pupil premium, pupils identified who have special educational needs and all other groups. As a result, teachers are able to take swift action to support any pupil in danger of falling behind. There is a strong focus of developing teachers to be as good as they can be. The staff are unanimous that leaders do all they can to improve teaching skills and that teaching is improving.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
While subject leaders play an important role in improving the quality of teaching across the school, the sharing of best practice, so that the good teachers in the school share their expertise, is still limited and could be developed further. The school involves parents well by encouraging them to support their children’s learning, for example, by sharing the children’s learning in the Early Years Foundation Stage on a Tuesday morning. Pupils’ personal development is nurtured very effectively and they are robustly safeguarded. The curriculum provides for learning in a full range of subjects and encourages enthusiasm for learning. The leadership of and provision for sport and physical education are growing strengths of the school. The primary school sports funding has increased the number of activities and has had a good impact on pupils’ confidence and well-being. The local authority provides appropriate support to the school through annual review meetings.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
The governance of the school: The governing body, under the leadership of the two vice-chairs of the governing body, discharges all its statutory responsibilities well. The governors have high aspirations for the school. Governors have a good understanding of the quality of teaching and check that teachers’ pay awards link to their performance. They assess the school’s performance and budget well. They have a good understanding of school improvement data regarding the school’s current performance and pupils’ progress. Consequently, they have a good awareness of the school’s strengths and areas to develop. They have been successful in raising the profile of the school within the community. The governing body is well placed to help the school to improve and to move forwards.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 106728 Local authority Doncaster Inspection number 430858
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 358 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Andy West and Ian Rutherford Headteacher Wendy Adamson Date of previous school inspection 13 March 2012 Telephone number 01302 344659 Fax number 01302 761533 Email address head@park.doncaster.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion