Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Daniel Towl
- Postcode verified
MK7 7HL
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 644
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Headteacher Wavendon Gate School Gregories Drive Milton Keynes MK7 7HL
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 23 January 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior and middle leaders, a member the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement action plans were evaluated. Brief visits were made to all classrooms.
p.1
Context
There have been several staff changes at the school since the section 5 inspection in November 2013. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5307 Email : rachel.evans@tribalgroup.com
p.1
Main findings
Areas for improvement identified at the last inspection are being tackled effectively, though the momentum for change would now benefit from an injection of pace.
p.2
Main findings
Pupils’ behaviour has improved. Behaviour in lessons and around the school is calmer. Pupils play energetically but conduct themselves in school in an appropriate manner. Some specific concerns about poor behaviour and attitudes to learning in some classes are being addressed effectively through improvements in the quality of teaching.
p.2
Main findings
A more systematic approach to teaching phonics (the sounds letters and their combinations make) across the school is helping to improve pupils’ reading and writing. You are correctly focusing on raising the quality of writing especially, in Years 2 and 3. Mathematics too is receiving closer scrutiny. A focus on assessment of pupils’ learning and ensuring that pupils of all abilities are challenged adequately in lessons are steps in the right direction. The main challenge for you now, in these areas, is to ensure that there is a consistency of approach by teachers across the school and that you quickly establish if the changes you have made are having the desired effect of raising pupils’ achievements.
p.2
Main findings
You have managed staff changes effectively and used expertise, where it is needed to bring continuity for pupils. Procedures for monitoring teaching have improved and now include more unannounced lesson observations by senior leaders. Lesson observations, scrutiny of pupils’ work and information about pupils’ progress are not yet as ‘sharply’ coordinated as they could be in order to provide a very clear and detailed picture of how the school is improving.
p.2
Main findings
The Governing Body has increased its numbers and successfully broadened its expertise. It is in a better position to challenge and support the school, though it is not yet undertaking enough activities to gather its own first-hand knowledge of how the school is doing.
p.2
Main findings
The school improvement plan, while covering all the areas that require improvement, is not as clear as it could be in identifying in detail what needs to be done, by when and by whom. It lacks specific sharp, short and medium term targets.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
External support from consultants and the local authority are helping to move the school forward but the impact of support has yet to be established in the medium and longer term. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Milton Keynes and as below.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion