Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Feb 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Daniel Towl

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Daniel Towl

  • Postcode verified

    MK7 7HL

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−6Mixedmore positive than 21% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyimprovedeffectivesuccessfullyclearimproving
Criticismpoornot yetconcernslacksyet tobelownot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

Headteacher Wavendon Gate School Gregories Drive Milton Keynes MK7 7HL

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 23 January 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior and middle leaders, a member the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement action plans were evaluated. Brief visits were made to all classrooms.

p.1

Context

There have been several staff changes at the school since the section 5 inspection in November 2013. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5307 Email : rachel.evans@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Main findings

Areas for improvement identified at the last inspection are being tackled effectively, though the momentum for change would now benefit from an injection of pace.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils’ behaviour has improved. Behaviour in lessons and around the school is calmer. Pupils play energetically but conduct themselves in school in an appropriate manner. Some specific concerns about poor behaviour and attitudes to learning in some classes are being addressed effectively through improvements in the quality of teaching.

p.2

Main findings

A more systematic approach to teaching phonics (the sounds letters and their combinations make) across the school is helping to improve pupils’ reading and writing. You are correctly focusing on raising the quality of writing especially, in Years 2 and 3. Mathematics too is receiving closer scrutiny. A focus on assessment of pupils’ learning and ensuring that pupils of all abilities are challenged adequately in lessons are steps in the right direction. The main challenge for you now, in these areas, is to ensure that there is a consistency of approach by teachers across the school and that you quickly establish if the changes you have made are having the desired effect of raising pupils’ achievements.

p.2

Main findings

You have managed staff changes effectively and used expertise, where it is needed to bring continuity for pupils. Procedures for monitoring teaching have improved and now include more unannounced lesson observations by senior leaders. Lesson observations, scrutiny of pupils’ work and information about pupils’ progress are not yet as ‘sharply’ coordinated as they could be in order to provide a very clear and detailed picture of how the school is improving.

p.2

Main findings

The Governing Body has increased its numbers and successfully broadened its expertise. It is in a better position to challenge and support the school, though it is not yet undertaking enough activities to gather its own first-hand knowledge of how the school is doing.

p.2

Main findings

The school improvement plan, while covering all the areas that require improvement, is not as clear as it could be in identifying in detail what needs to be done, by when and by whom. It lacks specific sharp, short and medium term targets.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

External support from consultants and the local authority are helping to move the school forward but the impact of support has yet to be established in the medium and longer term. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Milton Keynes and as below.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion