Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Morag Kophamel
- Postcode verified
TF4 2LF
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Teachers’ comments are now helping pupils to understand what they need to do in order to improve their work. p.2
- You have set clear expectations that this must happen rapidly so that these leaders can challenge and support other members of staff with confidence and credibility. p.3
- Your use of ‘table mats,’ that show the next steps in learning, is also helping pupils to judge how well they are doing and what they need to do next. p.2
- Your feedback to teachers is identifying precisely what they need to improve. p.2
- School leaders should now secure opportunities for teachers to work with colleagues beyond the school to confirm that their assessment judgements are accurate and consistent. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,307
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Paul Sanderson Ladygrove Primary School Old Office Road Dawley Telford TF4 2LF
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 30 January 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I held meetings with you and the deputy headteacher and with members of the governing body. I also met with a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the section 5 inspection. I evaluated school leaders’ plans for improving the school and I reviewed the information you provided about pupils’ progress. I also considered minutes from a local authority review meeting. In addition I looked at records of the checks that leaders have made on the quality of teachers’ work. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9158 Direct email : rachel.dayan@serco.com
p.1
Context
The headteacher is retiring at the end of the summer term 2014. The governing body is working, with the support of the local authority, to appoint his successor. A recent advertisement did not attract sufficient high quality candidates and so the decision was taken to re-advertise.
p.2
Context
A teacher with responsibility for leading Key Stage 1 and English is currently on maternity leave. A successful teacher from another school has been seconded to cover this absence.
p.2
Main findings
You, the staff and the governors are united in your determination to ensure that Ladygrove becomes a good school. You and the deputy headteacher have a clear view of the improvements required for the school to be judged as good at the next inspection. Your ‘raising attainment plan’ is well matched to the school’s most significant needs and clearly outlines the steps that you intend to take in order to make the necessary improvements. However, your plans do not always provide sufficient detail about how you will check that the actions you are taking are being successful.
p.2
Main findings
You have rightly focused on improving the quality of teaching in order to raise achievement. You have revised your systems for checking on teachers’ work; as a consequence leaders are now visiting lessons more frequently, as well as checking more often the work in pupils’ books. Your feedback to teachers is identifying precisely what they need to improve. Individual plans are in place for those teachers who need extra help to improve their teaching.
p.2
Main findings
Teachers’ assessments of pupils’ levels of attainment are collected regularly. This information is being used well by school leaders to determine which pupils are ‘on track’ to reach or exceed national expectations. However, the value of this information is dependent on the accuracy of the assessment judgements made by individual teachers and in the past these judgements have not always been accurate. The deputy headteacher is now working with teachers in Key Stage 2 to ensure that their judgements about pupils’ attainment levels are reliable. You have recognised the importance of this work for teachers all year groups. School leaders should now secure opportunities for teachers to work with colleagues beyond the school to confirm that their assessment judgements are accurate and consistent.
p.2
Main findings
Your focus on teachers’ marking is leading to improvements in the feedback that pupils receive. Teachers’ comments are now helping pupils to understand what they need to do in order to improve their work. Your use of ‘table mats,’ that show the next steps in learning, is also helping pupils to judge how well they are doing and what they need to do next. You have employed an additional teacher to provide targeted support for pupils who need additional help with their reading, writing and mathematics. However, the impact of this work on pupils’ progress has not yet been evaluated by school leaders and governors.
p.2
Main findings
The small proportion of pupils who are eligible for additional funding through the pupil premium are generally making progress in line with their classmates. Some of these pupils receive support from the additional teacher or from teaching assistants. However, school leaders do not check that all eligible pupils are benefiting from the additional funding.
p.3
Main findings
Teachers have received focused training in order to improve the teaching of phonics (the sounds that letters make) and increase the proportion of pupils reaching the expected standard in the Year 1 phonics check. You have purchased new reading books which allow pupils to practise and apply their knowledge of phonics in their reading. You have also worked with parents so that they know how to help their children ‘sound out’ words when they are reading at home. Records from your regular visits to lessons indicate that the teaching of phonics is improving and that pupils are beginning to make better progress.
p.3
Main findings
You have ensured that teachers in the Reception classes have had opportunities to visit other schools to learn from the good practice of others. Teachers are using these experiences to make improvements in the ways that they record and evaluate pupils’ progress and plan next steps in their learning.
p.3
Main findings
You have recognised that further work is required to ensure that all middle leaders are effective. You are currently working with some of these leaders to ensure that their own teaching is consistently good. You have set clear expectations that this must happen rapidly so that these leaders can challenge and support other members of staff with confidence and credibility.
p.3
Main findings
The governing body shares the determination of the school staff to make the necessary improvements without delay. Governors now have a good overview of the school’s strengths and areas for development but are not always able to provide evidence or examples to support their judgements. For example, governors believe that pupils eligible for additional support through the pupil premium are making good progress as a result of the intervention classes. However, they are not sure how many eligible pupils are benefitting from this support or how much progress has been made. Minutes from meetings of the governing body show that governors are increasingly asking challenging questions of leaders and are becoming more involved in checking information about pupils’ progress. Governors are keen to improve their skills and readily engage in the training provided by the local authority.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The local authority has an accurate view of the school’s strengths and areas for improvement and is providing good support to help the school move forward rapidly. A representative from the local authority has visited the school to meet with school leaders and governors, visit lessons, look at books and evaluate their plans for improvement. Similar meetings will take place each half term. Training and support have been provided to improve the teaching of phonics and to improve provision and outcomes in the Early Years Foundation Stage. The local authority has arranged for teachers to visit other local schools to learn from examples of good practice. Support is also being provided to develop the role and impact of middle leaders.
p.4
External support
In addition, the local authority is providing good support for governors as they seek to appoint a new headteacher.
p.4
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Telford and Wrekin.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion