Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Lisa Moore
- Postcode verified
KT12 5NB
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 802
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ms Anne Cooper Headteacher Bell Farm Primary School Hersham Road Hersham KT12 5NB
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 21 January 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in October 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During this inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher and deputy headteacher as well as with the Chair of the Governing Body and a representative from the local authority. Recent information relating to the attainment and progress of pupils currently in the school were shared and discussed. The inspector was given a tour of the school and brief visits were made to all classes, where a number of pupils were spoken to about their work. The vetting checks on staff were also examined. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s improvement plan were evaluated. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5307 Email : rachel.evans@tribalgroup.com
p.1
Context
Since the last inspection, an assistant headteacher has been appointed with responsibility for inclusion.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The leaders and governors of the school, with the support of the local authority, have responded promptly to the judgments of the recent inspection and are committed to securing the necessary improvements. Systems are in place to monitor pupils’ progress at regular points and to provide a range of additional support to help pupils of all abilities.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Senior leaders are acting to support teachers to improve the quality of teaching by helping them make better use of assessment information about pupils so that lessons are planned to meet the needs of all pupils. Senior leaders are using a range of information, including the progress made by pupils, the work in pupils’ books and what they observe in lessons to form an accurate picture of the quality of teaching. As a result they have a precise view of the school’s strengths and weaknesses and use this information to plan individual support for teachers. The school has a rigorous approach to self-evaluation.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school’s analysis of information for the autumn term shows that pupils in all year groups are making better progress than in previous years and in most year groups pupils are making good progress. This information identifies where pupils will need to make accelerated progress next term in order to make up lost ground and to reach the same levels as other pupils nationally.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Senior leaders are providing valuable support to help teachers to improve their work. For example, they are helping them to make better use of assessment information about pupils when they plan their lessons. As a result, lessons now meet different pupils’ needs more closely. A review of a number of policies at the beginning of the year has established a consistent approach to many aspects of teaching. Marking seen in pupils’ books is of particularly high quality because teachers’ comments explain to pupils how they can improve and pupils frequently respond in detail to their teachers’ comments. Equally, the presentation of written work in pupils’ books reflects the pride they take in their work and the consistently high standard demanded by teachers.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Links have been made with other local schools to offer staff a range of valuable development opportunities. Many actions and initiatives including training on the use of problem solving approaches in mathematics lessons are being introduced.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school improvement plan has been contributed to by senior leaders and the governors. It is directly linked to the priorities identified in the last inspection and closely reflects the local authority’s plan. The governing body has recently undergone a useful review, which has identified potential areas for development. The governors are undertaking a programme of school visits which is enabling them to observe and monitor different aspects of the school’s work. The recent addition of an Advanced Skills Governor to the governing body has further strengthened their capacity to support and challenge senior leaders.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The local authority knows the school well and is providing a high level of support, guidance and expertise. The leadership partner meets with senior leaders every half term to review the school’s progress and as a result continues to provide the school with the appropriate level of challenge and support.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Surrey and as below. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion