Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
South Ferriby Primary School
Summary
Robert Jones (lead), Susan Twaits
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
4 Dec 2013
- Inspectors verified
Robert Jones, Susan Twaits
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Postcode verified
DN18 6HU
- Name on report verified
South Ferriby Primary School
- URN verified
117752
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2010.
- OverallInadequate
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Many of the serious shortcomings which have led to the pupils making inadequate progress are now being tackled as leaders improve teaching and raise standards. p.4
- This is the result of previous weak teaching, targets for pupils that were set too low, repetitive work and low expectations of what pupils can do. p.4
- This is a school that has serious weaknesses. p.1
- In Key Stage 2, pupils’ spelling, punctuation, grammar and presentation skills are weak as a result of poor teaching in the past. p.1
- Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs have not made sufficient progress as a result of weak teaching combined with programmes that have not met their needs. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The quality of teaching has been strengthened considerably over the past 18 months. p.4
- There is now no inadequate teaching that remains and teaching in Reception and Key Stage 1 is consistently good. p.4
- The proportion of good teaching in Key Stage 2 is increasing but the school is aware that more needs to be consistently good and outstanding to make up for some weak reading, writing and mathematics skills that remain in the current Year 6 in particular. p.4
- Tasks are sometimes not matched well enough to pupils’ different abilities. p.4
- This means that the work is sometimes too easy, particularly for the most-able or too difficult for pupils. p.4
- The questions that pupils are asked by teachers sometimes are answered in single words, which do not develop their speaking skills well enough. p.4
- Some questions are too easy and do not require pupils to think deeply. p.4
- Mathematics teaching, although improving, sometimes does not capture pupils’ interests p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,767
- about usual (typical 3317)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 46
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 18%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
South Ferriby Primary School Horkstow Road, South Ferriby, Barton-upon-Humber, Lincolnshire,DN18 6HU
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Inadequate 4 Achievement of pupils Inadequate 4 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Requires improvement 3 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that has serious weaknesses. In Key Stage 2, pupils’ achievement is inadequate and has been for some time. Over time, too many pupils have left the school with unacceptably low skills in mathematics, reading and writing and a legacy of underachievement remains. In Key Stage 2, pupils’ spelling, punctuation, grammar and presentation skills are weak as a result of poor teaching in the past. Pupils’ basic mathematics skills are also weak. Work is sometimes too repetitive and pupils are not always given enough opportunities to use and apply their mathematical skills. The quality of teaching in Key Stage 2 is inconsistent and therefore requires improvement. Teachers do not always move learning on quickly in lessons. Sometimes, work is too hard or too easy for pupils or time is wasted as pupils wait for others to catch up. Behaviour and safety require improvement because sometimes pupils are not as engaged
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
as they might be with their learning. Some end up chatting to each other or going off task. Leadership and management require improvement. They have yet to ensure that the quality of teaching and pupils’ achievement in Key Stage 2 is consistently good.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
The headteacher has significantly raised expectations by setting challenging targets for pupils. As a result, standards are rising considerably. Achievement is good in the Early Years Foundation Stage and in Key Stage 1 as a result of consistently good teaching. Pupils’ progress in all years is accelerating rapidly. Initiatives introduced by the new headteacher are impacting positively on pupils’ achievement. Teaching is improving strongly. Governors have an impressive understanding of achievement and are now taking decisive action to improve teaching and achievement. Attendance is consistently above average.
p.1
Information about this inspection
This inspection was carried out by two inspectors over one day. The inspectors observed six parts of lessons, taught by four staff. Meetings were held with pupils, the headteacher, other staff and members of the governing body. The lead inspector had a telephone conversation with a representative from the local authority. Pupils were observed around the school and in the playground and were heard reading. Insufficient responses had been submitted to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View), so responses from parents to a recent parents’ evening were analysed by inspectors. Inspectors scrutinised a number of documents including school improvement plans, minutes of the governing body meetings and records relating to behaviour, attendance and safeguarding.
p.2
Inspection team
Robert Jones, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Susan Twaits Additional Inspector
p.2
Full report
In accordance with section 44 of the Education Act 2005 (as amended), Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.
p.3
Information about this school
This is a smaller than average primary school serving the rural population around the village of South Ferriby, just south of the Humber Bridge. The school was newly built in 2006. A below average proportion of pupils is supported by the pupil premium, which provides additional funding for those pupils in local authority care, and for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals and children from service families. Only a small number of pupils are supported by the pupil premium. The proportion of pupils with special educational needs and supported through school action varies from year to year as is expected in a small school, but at the time of inspection, it was broadly average. The proportion of pupils supported through school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs at the time of the inspection was above average. All pupils are of White British heritage. In 2013, the school met the government’s current floor standard, which sets the minimum
p.3
Information about this school
expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in English and mathematics by the end of Year 6. At the time of the inspection, the headteacher had been in post for two years. The school has recently recovered from a serious financial situation.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve teaching so that it is at least consistently good and hence raise achievement in reading, writing and mathematics in Key Stage 2 by: ensuring that pupils’ spelling, punctuation, grammar and presentation skills are developed effectively so they are well-prepared for the next stage in their education ensuring that pupils are given work that is neither too easy nor too difficult for their different abilities making sure that pupils are not kept waiting for others to catch up or for the teacher to start the lesson so that pupils do not lose concentration and their attitudes to learning are always good giving pupils challenging questions to answer in lessons which require them to think hard and answer in full sentences so that their speaking skills are improved making sure that in mathematics work enables pupils to apply their mathematical skills.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management so that it becomes at least good by: improving the checks that are made to ensure that the quality of teaching in Key Stage 2 enables pupils to make at least good progress increasing the rigour with which teachers are held closely to account for the progress their pupils are making improving subject leaders’ use of data so they can be sure that all the improvements to the curriculum and of interventions are having a positive effect on improving teaching and raising achievement.
p.3
The achievement of pupils is inadequate
In Key Stage 2, all groups of pupils underachieve in reading, writing and mathematics. Pupils have not made enough progress for several years. Given their starting points, standards at the end of Key Stage 2 are too low. This is the result of previous weak teaching, targets for pupils that were set too low, repetitive work and low expectations of what pupils can do. In the past, in some years, the bad behaviour of a minority of pupils adversely affected their progress. Achievement in reading and writing is inadequate. Weaknesses in literacy skills prevent pupils from making better progress. For Key Stage 2 pupils, this is because their needs were not met well when they were in Key Stage 1. Pupils make errors in the spelling, punctuation and grammar because they have not learned these skills systematically as they have progressed through the school. Moreover, the work in pupils’ books shows that their presentation skills are
p.4
The achievement of pupils is inadequate
sometimes weak. This makes it difficult for pupils to read their own work. Pupils are able to read fluently because they are taught how sounds relate to letters, but they lack the skills to understand fully what they have read. Similarly, achievement in mathematics over time is inadequate because pupils have not learned how to calculate numbers well enough when they were in Key Stage 1. Moreover, pupils sometimes struggle to apply what they have learned in mathematics lessons, for example, in a real-life situation. Over time, the most-able pupils underachieve because the work they are given does not match their abilities well enough. Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs have not made sufficient progress as a result of weak teaching combined with programmes that have not met their needs. The interventions for these pupils are now tailored more specifically for individuals and as a result,
p.4
The achievement of pupils is inadequate
progress is now accelerating in all year groups. Children enter the school with skills and abilities that are below those typically expected for their chronological age. Over time they do not make enough progress. However, improvements in teaching throughout the school are having most impact on achievement in Reception and Key Stage 1. School data and inspection evidence show that these pupils are making good and sometimes outstanding progress from their often low starting points in all subjects. Standards at the end of Year 2 are now comparable with those nationally. Since so few pupils are supported by the pupil premium, any direct comparisons of their attainment or progress between them and other pupils is not significant. Many of the serious shortcomings which have led to the pupils making inadequate progress are now being tackled as leaders improve teaching and raise standards. Data show that pupils in Key
p.4
The achievement of pupils is inadequate
Stage 2 are now making better progress and overall pupils are on track to reach standards in reading, writing and mathematics that are close to national averages by the time they leave. As a result of the inadequate achievement made by pupils, the school has not promoted equal opportunities well enough. However, the school now measures the progress of boys, girls and any who are supported by the pupil premium funding well and has now identified which pupils are at risk of falling behind.
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
The quality of teaching has been strengthened considerably over the past 18 months. There is now no inadequate teaching that remains and teaching in Reception and Key Stage 1 is consistently good. The proportion of good teaching in Key Stage 2 is increasing but the school is aware that more needs to be consistently good and outstanding to make up for some weak reading, writing and mathematics skills that remain in the current Year 6 in particular. Tasks are sometimes not matched well enough to pupils’ different abilities. This means that the work is sometimes too easy, particularly for the most-able or too difficult for pupils. The questions that pupils are asked by teachers sometimes are answered in single words, which do not develop their speaking skills well enough. Some questions are too easy and do not require pupils to think deeply. Mathematics teaching, although improving, sometimes does not capture pupils’ interests
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
because on occasion they spend long periods of time completing repetitive questions. This means pupils sometimes struggle to apply what they have learned. The teaching of reading has improved considerably. Where pupils were once reading and not fully understanding what they had read, they are now quizzed by the teacher and each other about how characters feel in stories and are encouraged to reflect on what they have read. In pupils’ writing, inspectors saw evidence of how targets for improving their written English were vague or even absent in their past work. The work they have been doing since December 2012 has improved significantly as a result of them being clear about, for example, what constitutes good letter-writing or good writing to persuade. Even so, the teaching of writing still requires improvement to overcome weaknesses in pupils’ spelling, punctuation and grammar. The feedback that pupils are given on their work is improving. In Key Stage 1 and Reception, it
p.5
The quality of teaching requires improvement
is usually good and sometimes exemplary, with teachers writing detailed comments that they then spend time talking through with pupils. This enables them to make immediate improvements to their work. Teaching in Reception and Key Stage 1 is consistently good and improving rapidly. All the teaching observed by the inspection team was of good quality. Teachers make sure pupils enjoy learning through play and learn the essentials of reading, writing and mathematics. In the Early Years Foundation Stage, children quickly learn to write common words and make simple calculations because teachers make learning fun; both indoors and outdoors. In one lesson, children worked with each other very well, drawing number lines in chalk outside to help them understand what happens when they add or take away. Teaching assistants know just how much help to give pupils without over supporting them. This helps them to solve their own problems and become confident learners who can think things out
p.5
The quality of teaching requires improvement
for themselves. Inspectors saw several pupils with disabilities and special educational needs working very well with other pupils while teaching assistants kept a watchful eye from a distance.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement
Behaviour and safety require improvement because, in lessons, some pupils’ attitudes to learning are not always good. At the beginnings of lessons and in between sections of lessons, there is sometimes a lull while teachers organise themselves or distribute materials. During lessons some pupils are also kept waiting while others catch up. During these periods of inactivity a minority of pupils switch off and chat to each other, particularly in Key Stage 2 and lose interest in their learning. In the playground and around the school, including at lunchtimes, pupils are generally well- behaved and are, on the whole, polite and courteous to adults and to each other. They take pride in wearing their uniform smartly and are keen to help to keep their classrooms tidy. The school keeps a close watch on attendance and this has ensured that it remains above average. Pupils say they feel safe and secure from any threats of bullying. School records indicate that
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement
there have been a small number of cases of bullying but indicate that it is dealt with robustly on the rare occasions it has occurred. Pupils understand how to stay safe when using the Internet. All pupils spoken to by inspectors were very clear what they should do if they received any threatening text messages on their mobile phones. School records indicate that in the past the bad behaviour of a minority of pupils has adversely affected learning. More recent records also indicate that this has improved significantly. Behaviour in classrooms is now orderly because teachers manage behaviour well and pupils are taught the importance of taking responsibility for their actions and co-operating with each other.
p.5
The leadership and management requires improvement
Leadership and management require improvement because since the last inspection leaders have not acted quickly enough to put robust measures into place to improve teaching and raise achievement., Significant staffing and financial issues took up a considerable proportion of the current headteacher’s time when she first took up her post and have hampered improvements to teaching. However, the headteacher has put into place some well-considered initiatives to tackle underperformance in teaching, pupils’ achievement and poor behaviour robustly. Successes are clearly evident, such as the good progress seen for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage and in Key Stage 1 where standards are rising rapidly. Improvements are now also being seen through Key Stage 2, albeit slower than in other key stages. Leaders are yet to ensure that the quality of teaching in Key Stage 2 is consistently good. This is because the
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
checks made on the quality of teaching sometimes lack rigour. Even so, the headteacher’s drive to improve achievement and teaching is having a very positive, long-lasting effect and shows the ability to improve the school’s effectiveness further. Leaders hold teachers to account for the progress pupils make, but the arrangements for doing so are rather informal and not always rigorous enough. The checks are too infrequent for urgent action to be taken if pupils begin to fall behind. The records of these checks are not yet good enough, particularly in Key Stage 2 to ensure that any issues that are discussed in one meeting can be followed up robustly in the next. Previously, targets for what all pupils are expected to achieve were set too low and the methods used to track pupils’ progress were weak. This did not enable senior or subject leaders to keep a close enough watch on pupils’ progress. However, more challenging targets are now set and this
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
is having a positive effect on raising achievement across the school. Senior and subject leaders have introduced many new courses and interventions designed to help those who have fallen behind to catch up and improve all pupils’ achievement. However, school leaders do not yet use data sharply enough to so they can be sure that all these improvements to the curriculum and new interventions are having a positive effect. The curriculum has been overhauled and improved, particularly so that pupils can make better links across different subjects and improve their literacy skills across subjects such as science and history. In the Early Years Foundation Stage, the good curriculum now enables teachers and leaders to track carefully the progress children make in all areas of learning both indoors and outside. Pupils develop a good awareness of spiritual, moral, social and cultural issues through the varied
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
and interesting curriculum on offer. In one lesson, pupils considered the balance between the importance of tourism to Mount Everest and the threats to the ecology of the area. The primary school sport funding is being used to make better sports links between schools and to pay for expert coaching. This helps pupils to understand the importance of leading active lifestyles and ensures that more pupils participate in sports. There are good plans in place for this work between schools to continue when the funding ceases. Arrangements for safeguarding meet the government’s current requirements. The local authority has been slow to challenge leaders for the underachievement of pupils that had been evident for some years. It is only relatively recently that it has brokered support from a small group of schools, which is now enabling staff to share their expertise. The governance of the school: Over time, members of the governing body have been well aware that achievement has not
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
been good enough. Governors were aware of sliding standards, but all their efforts were taken up dealing with serious issues relating to finance. These issues have now been resolved and, for the past 12 months, their focus has been firmly on raising achievement. Members of the governing body have an impressive understanding of national statistics against which the school is judged. The performance of the headteacher is managed rigorously and governors keep a close watch on the management of teachers’ performance and how it relates to the quality of their teaching. Funding from the pupil premium is small. Governors are kept well- informed of what it is spent on, and are aware of their need to hold leaders even more closely to account for the impact of its spending.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.8
School details
Unique reference number 117752 Local authority North Lincolnshire Inspection number 427272
p.9
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.9
School details
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 79 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair James Shipstone Headteacher Lynn Findlay Date of previous school inspection 20 October 2010 Telephone number 01652 635251 Fax number 01652 634968 Email address admin.sferriby@northlincs.gov.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.10
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.10
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.10
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.10
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion