Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Feb 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Margaret Farrow

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Margaret Farrow

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingpositiveeffectiveaccuratelyimprovingtimely
Criticismat riskfalling behindabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
864
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566939 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: glaw@cfbt.com

p.1

Mr J Trueman Headteacher Silver Tree Primary School Durham Road Ushaw Moor Durham DH7 7LF

p.1

School, Durham

Following my visit to your school on 17 January 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School, Durham

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School, Durham

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School, Durham

 Ensure that all middle leaders routinely monitor teaching across the school  Urgently develop a partnership with the local authority’s suggested partner school to enable teachers to observe good and outstanding teaching and leadership.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I met with you, senior and middle leaders, representatives from the governing body including the Chair of Governors. I also met with a representative from the local authority’s education development service. I scrutinised the school improvement plan, minutes of the Governing Body meetings, your monitoring records of teaching that you have carried out since the inspection and details of pupils’ achievement in each year group.

p.1

Context

Since the inspection governors have appointed a new coordinator for mathematics. One teacher remains on long-term sickness absence.

p.1

Main findings

You and the governing body wasted no time in developing a succinct improvement plan. Specific targets in the plan are enabling governors and local authority officers to check the impact of actions being taken to improve the quality of teaching and pupils’ progress and achievement. Plans have been regularly and accurately reviewed since the inspection, with detailed reports provided about the progress made to the governing body. This information, evidence from lessons we observed and your detailed tracking of pupils achievements indicate that pupils’ progress in English and mathematics is improving and changes to phonics teaching is making a positive difference to pupils’ basic skills.

p.2

Main findings

Because governors quickly reconfigured their committee structure there is now a stronger focus on checking whether actions are bringing about the improvements needed. They receive much more appropriate reports and information about pupils’ progress. Governing body meeting minutes show they are much more challenging and ask more pertinent questions about the school’s performance than they did previously. In addition, regular local authority steering group meetings are adding an additional layer of scrutiny which is helping the school to maintain its focus on driving improvement. ’Weekly meetings between you, senior team and the six Chairs of various committees ensure they are always up to date with the actions being taken and the monthly reports on the action plan enable them to see the impact of those actions.

p.2

Main findings

The deputy headteacher and middle leaders are more involved in monitoring the work of the school. Changes they have implemented to teachers’ planning, the use of assessment information in lessons and the detailed scrutiny of mathematics and English books carried out with local authority advisers has helped teachers to improve the quality and impact of their teaching. Together with the now regular in-school key stage meetings, this means everyone has a much more timely view of the progress pupils are making in class and progress towards actions in the action plan. Such work has enabled middle leaders to target additional support and interventions to pupils at risk of falling behind to help them catch up quickly. Middle leaders however do not have the range of skills necessary to monitor the quality of teaching. Plans need to be brought forward so they have the skills to support the required drive to improve all teaching to good or better by the target of summer 2014.

p.2

Main findings

Additionally, plans to enable teachers to visit other schools to look at good practice in teaching and assessment are not happening quickly enough.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection. I will return in the summer term to check on the progress being made.

p.2

External support

The local authority acted quickly to increase the level of support to the school following the inspection. Actions taken by the maths and literacy advisers have already made a positive difference to the quality of teaching in mathematics and phonics and in the skills of leaders of those subjects to help them monitor teachers’ planning and the quality of work in lessons. Good support and challenge from the education development partner is helping to build the skills of governors in checking the impact of actions and challenging you and middle leaders. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's and Adult’s Services for Durham. Yours sincerely

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion