Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Feb 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jane Wotherspoon

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jane Wotherspoon

  • Postcode verified

    TW13 4LZ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+3Mixedmore positive than 26% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositiveeffectiveclearlyimprovingclearkeen
Criticismweaknessesfalling behindincompletelower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
846
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Ms Angela White Acting Headteacher Feltham Hill Infant and Nursery School Bedfont Road Lower Feltham Middlesex TW13 4LZ

p.1

and Nursery School

Following my visit to your school on 17 January 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report my findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection in October 2013 when the school was judged to require improvement. The visit was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

and Nursery School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

and Nursery School

 improve the quality of observations made of children’s learning in the Early Years Foundation Stage; use the assessment information from these observations to plan what children learn next and as a starting point to measure their progress over time  ensure that governors’ visits to the school focus more closely on evaluating the impact of key actions in the school’s action plan.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I met you and other senior leaders, representatives from the governing body, and the consultant who works with the school on behalf of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I met a range of teaching and support staff at the end of the school day. I looked at the school’s Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com action plan. You showed me the changes you have made to the learning environment in the Early Years Foundation Stage, to teachers’ planning and to the system for tracking pupils’ attainment and progress.

p.1

Context

The headteacher has been absent from school since the start of November. The deputy headteacher is acting headteacher and other staff have stepped up to take on leadership roles. Two classes in Year 2 are currently taught by supply staff.

p.2

Main findings

You and the staff have adopted a positive approach to tackling the issues from the inspection. Staff say that morale is high; they are working better as a team and sharing what works well for the children. They have confidence in your leadership and that of the senior team, and they appreciate the support you give them to improve. Staff report that pupils are more involved in learning than in the past. I saw for myself that children in the Early Years Foundation Stage, both boys and girls, were engaged in a wide range of activities to develop their reading, writing and number skills. You know that there is more to do to improve the range of activities available outdoors.

p.2

Main findings

The school’s action plan includes appropriate activities that focus clearly on improving the quality of teaching. The plan includes specific dates when the impact of actions will be checked through assessing pupils’ attainment and progress. Plans to produce a calendar of activities and for governors to align their meetings to coincide with the availability of assessment information are sensible.

p.2

Main findings

You have made significant changes to the system for recording the information collected about pupils’ attainment and progress. Supported by termly meetings in which the progress of each child is discussed, the system enables you and staff to identify quickly any child in danger of falling behind. Once identified, you take action to help such pupils catch up. This potentially helpful system is undermined by the variability in the quality, regularity and frequency of observations in the Early Years Foundation Stage. The result of these weaknesses is an incomplete, and potentially inaccurate, picture of the children’s starting points and their progress over time.

p.2

Main findings

The external review of governance has helped governors to recognise what they have not been doing well in the past and what they need to do in the future. Training will focus on how to interpret and ask more searching questions of the school’s assessment information. The next step is to ensure that when governors visit the school they have a clear focus on checking an aspect of the action plan.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

You and the staff are keen to act on the advice and guidance offered by the local authority’s consultant. Support for staff is already making a difference to the quality of their planning and is having a positive impact on what the children actually do in the classroom. Staff have benefited from visiting another school to see good practice and from sharing what they learnt with colleagues. The external review of governance has been well received by governors. It has provided the structure for a bespoke package of training from the local authority.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hounslow.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion