Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

St James' CofE Junior School

Inspected 15 Jan 2014 · published 5 Feb 2014 · URN 112298

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Naomi Taylor (lead), Sheila Mawer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Jan 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Naomi Taylor, Sheila Mawer

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    CA28 7HG

  • Name on report verified

    St James’ CofE Junior School

  • URN verified

    112298

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+6Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progressoutstandingconsistentlyimprovedeffectivehighly effectiveexceptionallyimproving
Criticismnot alwaysrequires improvementinadequatemissednot yetnot consistentlycompromisedserious

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings138w+62
  • What needs to improve2162w+2

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,213
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 5%What needs to improve 71%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

St James’ CofE Junior School Wellington Row, Whitehaven, Cumbria, CA28 7HG

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Requires improvement 3 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

 The standard of pupils’ writing is similar to the national average. Given their starting points, their writing should be better. They do not always have enough time in lessons to improve their work.  Similarly, standards in reading are in line with the national average, but across each year group pupils do not make consistently good progress. The guided reading sessions are not always planned well enough.  Pupils’ attainment in spelling, punctuation and grammar is lower than expected. Across all subjects, there are missed opportunities for pupils to improve these skills.  The quality of teaching is too variable. In recent years, it has not been good enough to enable pupils to achieve consistently well across each year group and in all subjects.  Teachers do not always expect enough of pupils as they move from Key Stage 1 to Key Stage 2. Occasionally, there are missed opportunities to make the activities relevant to

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

real-life situations. When this is the case, pupils become distracted from what they should be doing and behaviour deteriorates.  Records of incidents regarding behaviour and safety are not analysed carefully enough to make further improvements in pupils’ security.  Subject leaders do not have sufficient impact on improving teaching and achievement in their subjects across the school.  Senior leaders and governors have an overly positive view of the quality of teaching and levels of progress made by pupils over time.

p.1

The school has the following strengths

 Since appointment, the headteacher is driving change and improvement. As a result, the quality of teaching and pupils' achievement are beginning to improve rapidly.  There have been improvements in the standards and achievement in mathematics. Current work shows that this is continuing.  Pupils feel safe in school. Older pupils enjoy taking on responsibilities and acting as good role models to the younger pupils.  The school promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well.  A wide range of additional activities brings variety and enjoyment to pupils’ learning.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed teaching in 10 lessons, one of which was observed jointly with the headteacher. In addition, the inspectors made a number of short visits to lessons and listened to pupils read.  Discussions were held with school staff; groups of pupils; senior staff and leaders with responsibility for a specific subject; governors; parents and a representative from the local authority.  The inspector observed the school’s work and looked at a wide range of documentation including safeguarding documents, the school’s procedures for gaining an accurate view of its own performance, its development plans, records of pupils’ standards and progress, documents relating to attendance and behaviour, and pupils’ work in their books.  There were 28 parental responses to the online questionnaire (Parent View) which the inspectors took into account alongside the responses to the school’s own parental survey. Seventeen

p.2

Information about this inspection

responses to the inspection questionnaire for staff were taken into account.

p.2

Inspection team

Naomi Taylor, Lead inspector Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 St James’ is smaller than most primary schools.  The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium is lower than that found nationally. This is funding based on the number of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, any pupils who are looked after by the local authority, and any children with a parent in the armed forces.  The proportion of pupils supported at school action is below average. The proportion supported by school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is above average.  Most pupils are White British. Very few are from minority ethnic backgrounds.  Most pupils have previously attended St James’ CofE Infant School nearby.  Since the previous inspection, a new headteacher and a new deputy headteacher have been appointed. New teachers were appointed in September 2013.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations

p.3

Information about this school

for pupils’ attainment and progress in English and mathematics.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching so that all is good or better by ensuring that: - teachers have consistently high expectations of what pupils can achieve as they move from Key Stage 1 to Key Stage 2 - learning is made relevant to pupils so that they have consistently good attitudes to learning - teachers allow time in lessons for pupils to improve and edit their work, especially their writing.  Raise pupils’ achievement in reading and writing by: - improving the planning, teaching and evaluation of progress in guided reading sessions - ensuring that across all subjects, teachers use every opportunity for pupils to improve their spelling, punctuation and grammar both in their speaking and their written work.  Improve leadership and management, including governance, by:  enabling the teachers who lead subjects to improve the quality of teaching in their subjects  senior leaders analysing records of incidents in order to plan future actions to improve

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

behaviour and safety  ensuring members of the governing body and senior leaders improve the accuracy of their evaluation of how well their school is doing compared to others nationally.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and governance may be improved.

p.3

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Results of the 2011 and 2012 national tests for Year 6 pupils and the school’s pupil assessment data indicate that progress made by pupils was inconsistent across year groups and subjects, particularly in reading, writing and mathematics.  Pupils’ achievement, however, has improved. In 2013, most pupils in Year 6 made the progress expected of them although too few did better than that. Assessments of current pupils in Years 4, 5 and 6 show that progress is accelerating rapidly, although not so well in Year 3. Standards in reading and writing are now similar to national expectations for their age, but they could be much better given the pupils’ starting points in Year 3.  Pupils’ abilities when they join the school are usually at least in line with, and for many, higher than national expectations. The school has introduced assessments in the autumn term of Year 3 which verify that a minority of the most able pupils are not as confident in their reading and

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

writing as might be expected.  Year 6 pupils leaving school in 2013 reached standards in spelling, punctuation and grammar that were below average. The school is addressing this and the current Year 6 pupils are in line to meet national expectations.  Pupils are doing well in mathematics and there is improvement across all current year groups. Standards reached in mathematics are higher than the national average.  Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs are well supported; they make similar progress to their peers and some do better.  Pupils eligible for the pupil premium, including those known to be eligible for free school meals, now make similar progress to all pupils and some do better, as a result of additional support carefully targeted by senior leaders. Their attainment in mathematics, reading and writing is similar to this group of pupils nationally.  The most able pupils are now making the progress expected but occasionally there are missed

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

opportunities to really engage with them through relevant, real-life learning. The school displays real commitment to promote equality of opportunity for all pupils.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 The quality of teaching is not consistently good across all lessons, both over time and as seen during the inspection.  Sometimes teachers do not expect enough of pupils, particularly when they join the school. Teaching at the beginning of Year 3 does not help pupils in the first few days and weeks to build on the skills and knowledge they have learnt at the end of Year 2.  In some lessons, pupils are given activities to complete but there is no real understanding by the pupils as to how this will be relevant to them in real-life situations. For example, during a guided reading session, pupils discussed an extract which referred to extreme weather conditions. However, no reference was made to recent weather conditions in this country and overseas, which could have made the learning more relevant.  When the teachers do not plan lessons well enough to fully engage pupils, they become distracted, behaviour deteriorates and not enough progress is made.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 In lessons where pupils made good progress, they were encouraged to find out things for themselves and develop their ideas. An example of this was seen in a Year 6 English lesson. In pairs, pupils analysed an extract from a book and shared their observations. The teacher skilfully introduced role play to encourage pupils to use language vividly so they could write well. All pupils were enjoying their learning and made good progress.  The introduction of themed work has been effective in bringing science, history, geography and other subjects to life. The water theme is currently engaging pupils’ imaginations but there are missed opportunities to improve pupils’ spelling, punctuation and grammar in what pupils say and write in these sessions.  The use and quality of teaching assistants are good. The staff check around the class asking pupils questions to deepen pupils’ thinking and understanding. They extend pupils’ skills and

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

help them to become more independent rather than dependent on them.  Teachers check how well pupils are doing during lessons and ask good questions to make pupils think and explain their reasoning. Work is regularly marked but there is not always enough time in lessons for pupils to edit or correct their work, particularly their writing. This hampers pupils’ progress.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils require improvement

 The school’s work to keep pupils safe and secure requires improvement. Although incidents are recorded and acted upon, there is a lack of analysis by senior leaders to improve behaviour and safety further.  The behaviour of pupils requires improvement. Whereas in most lessons, during breaks and when visiting other places pupils are well mannered and polite, there are times when this is not the case.  Some parents raised concerns with the inspectors about how well behaviour was managed in some classes and this was reflected in the responses to Parent View.  The inspectors observed at first hand that in some lessons pupils were fully involved from the start. They were focused, engrossed and helped each other to solve problems and, as a result, they behaved impeccably. In other lessons where teaching was not stimulating enough, pupils were off-task, fidgeting and distracted. This hampered their learning and progress.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils require improvement

 In most lessons, pupils generally worked well together, particularly if the task was enjoyable and interesting. They took turns, negotiated, compromised and learnt how to form a collective view.  Pupils said that behaviour was generally good, but occasionally there was bullying such as name-calling. Pupils have a good understanding of different types of bullying and could talk about how to keep safe when using computers.  The school has developed older pupils to be role models and play leaders and this has improved the behaviour of pupils at lunchtimes.  Some pupils join the school other than at the usual times because they have experienced difficulties in other schools. The staff are successful in helping these pupils to settle in and improve their behaviour.  The school considers pupils’ social and emotional development to be of great importance. Staff work closely with parents and other agencies to make sure that pupils and their families get the

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils require improvement

support that they need.  Pupils are encouraged to take part in sports to help them stay healthy and promote their well- being. The primary school sport funding is to be allocated towards working with external coaches. This is to improve the skills of staff so that they can teach a wider range of sporting activities to a higher standard. Pupils reluctant to participate in sport have become more engaged with the introduction of indoor bowling and a link with a local club.  Pupils’ attendance is broadly average and improving.

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

 Leadership and management, including governance, require improvement because the school has not been able to maintain good progress across year groups since the previous inspection, when the school was judged to be good.  The headteacher has introduced thorough procedures to effect improvement. Although these have yet to have full impact in external tests, particularly in reading and writing, the school is now improving and demonstrates that it can improve further.  The headteacher has developed a clear understanding of school priorities and actions to address these have been quickly put into place.  The headteacher checks the quality of teaching, which directly links with training and support needs of staff as well as salary progression.  The role of some subject leaders is not yet fully developed in checking on the progress of groups of pupils and taking action to accelerate achievement in their areas of responsibility.

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

 The local authority has been effective in recently starting programmes to develop the expertise of leaders and managers, including the governing body, at the request of the headteacher.  Safeguarding arrangements meet statutory requirements, although one element of the school’s work requires further improvement.  The school promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well. Pupils take part in many after-school activities and the range of trips enriches their experiences.  The governance of the school:  Many governors are new to their roles but are highly committed to the school. They manage the budget well and have successfully appointed new staff. Governors agree on how the pupil- premium grant is used but they are not yet fully aware of the use of the additional sport funding. They are kept informed about the quality of teaching and link teachers’ salary progression to pupils’ progress. Governors review information about standards at the end of

p.6

The leadership and management require improvement

Year 6 but are less well informed regarding progress that pupils make from year to year, in different classes and across subjects throughout the school. As a result, they have not held school leaders sufficiently to account for the academic performance of the school. The governors and the senior leaders have been overly positive in evaluating the overall effectiveness of the school compared to others nationally. However, governors are keen to attend training designed to help them carry out their duties.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 112298 Local authority Cumbria Inspection number 433167

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary controlled Age range of pupils 7–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 186 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Jeremy Gilmore Headteacher Moira Maughan Date of previous school inspection 9 September 2010 Telephone number 01946 695311 Fax number 01946 599926 Email address admin@stjamesjun.cumbria.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion