Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Brian Cartwright
- Postcode verified
B30 1DY
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 682
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Clive Sentance Headteacher King's Norton Boys' School Northfield Road B30 1DY
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 15 January 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
School
establish links with a good or better school.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, middle managers, the Governing Body and the local authority link representative to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated. Several lessons were visited, students work scrutinised, and an analysis of student progress data carried out.
p.1
Main findings
The inspection in November correctly identified improvements in teaching that were already underway. These are effectively driven by your systematic approach to Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 01216 799154 Direct email : aidan.dunne@serco.com tackling long-standing mediocrity. A key factor has been your elimination of weaker teaching, through targeted support for teachers and a school-wide professional development programme. As a result, faculty leaders, many of whom are recent appointments, can point to clear evidence of improvements in teaching.
p.1
Main findings
The inspection brought attention to the need for planning lessons that address the learning needs of all students, and for teachers to improve written feedback to students. Both elements are occurring in all the lessons seen at this visit, indicating a welcome and consistent whole-school response. It will take some time before these approaches impact on student progress, but current data points to higher standards now, in comparison with the same period last year. Developmental feedback to students on what they should do to improve is clear in most examples seen. Not all students are consistently responding to it. Some lesson plans use a basic model that assumes more able pupils do easier work before attempting more challenging activities, and take little account of the previous lesson’s end point.
p.2
Main findings
Governors were disappointed at the grades awarded in the recent inspection, given, as they saw it, improving attainment and attendance over time in the main school and sixth form. Meeting notes convey succinct summaries of discussion. The steering committee meeting I attended rigorously questioned the progress the school is making against the Ofsted action plan. The committee forensically probed evidence from external and internal performance datasets, including information on teaching quality. The school action plan addresses the points for improvement well, and would be further enhanced by clearer student outcome milestones.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The local authority has appointed a link representative to support the school. The head teacher has met with local colleagues to exchange information about effective approaches to raising attainment. There is on-going leadership training for governors already in place. Links with good or better schools are planned so that staff at Kings Norton Boys can visit good practice in other settings. At this early stage there is limited evidence of impact from external support, although the governing body meeting was effective in challenging school leaders.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Birmingham and as below.
p.2
Her Majesty’s Inspector
The letter should be copied to the following:
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body Local authority The Education Funding Agency (EFA) if the school has a sixth form
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion