Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Spixworth Infant School

Inspected 15 Jan 2014 · published 4 Feb 2014 · URN 120896

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Jan 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Robert Greatrex

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    NR10 3PX

  • Name on report verified

    Spixworth Infant School

  • URN verified

    120896

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+32Mostly positivemore positive than 6% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progressstrongexceptionallypositiveoutstandingimprovedgood progressenjoy
Criticisminadequatestrugglerequires improvementnot yetlowerweakdo not knowserious

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1397w+36
  • Leadership740w+21
  • What needs to improve126w+54

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,171
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 46%Leadership 25%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

Spixworth Infant School Ivy Road, Spixworth, Norwich, Norfolk NR10 3PX

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  In three of the last five years, pupils left the school with exceptionally high combined levels in reading, writing and mathematics.  From their very varied levels when they start school, pupils make good progress in Reception, Year 1 and Year 2.  Disabled children and those with special educational needs benefit from extra help, often in small groups looking at a particular skill, so they do well.  Pupils are made to think by their teachers’ good use of various types of questioning.  Spixworth is a harmonious school where staff and pupils respect one another. As a result, pupils behave well.  Pupils say, and parents confirm, that they feel safe at school.  The school is a focal point of the local community.  Over many years, the school leaders and governors have a good track record of enabling staff to do well for the school and progress in their careers.  School leaders and governors have maintained

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

high pupils’ achievement over several years.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 Some teaching methods the school feels are successful are not used in all classes.  Boys’ written work is sometimes untidy and their handwriting little improved.  Pupils say they are not clear how to use the marking of their work to improve further.  Pupils’ skills at linking letters to the sounds they make are low.  Extra money provided by the government for sports is not yet used to offer pupils a greater range of opportunities or to train staff, nor is it clear how the school will check value for money.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 The inspector observed six lessons. Five were joint observations with one or other of the co- headteachers.  The inspector made other visits to classes, looked at pupils’ workbooks and listened to them read.  The inspector held discussions with pupils, the co-headteachers, other staff, governors, parents and a representative of the local authority.  The inspector took account of the 26 responses to the online questionnaire (Parent View). The inspector also took account of the school’s own parent survey. The responses to the 11 staff questionnaires were also considered.  The inspector observed the school’s work and looked at a number of documents, including: the school’s own information on pupils’ progress; planning and monitoring documentation; the school’s view of its own performance; records of how the school uses its funding, especially how the money from pupil premium is spent; records relating to behaviour and attendance; and

p.2

Information about this inspection

documents relating to safeguarding children.

p.2

Inspection team

Robert Greatrex, Lead inspector Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 This is a smaller-than-average infant school.  The vast majority of pupils come from White British backgrounds.  In comparison with other schools, the school has a much higher proportion of boys than girls.  The proportion of pupils supported by the pupil premium (the extra government funding for pupils looked after by the local authority, those known to be eligible for free school meals and those from service families) is well below average.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported through school action is above average. The proportion supported through school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is also above average.  Pupils are taught in four classes. All of Reception children and some Year 1 pupils are in two classes. The rest of Year 1 and all of Year 2 are in two other classes.  An independently run pre-school and a children’s centre share the site and building.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching by:  ensuring all teachers follow the school’s guidelines and expectations, particularly in relation to how all pupils assess their own work and boys present their work  providing pupils with clear age-appropriate guidance to improve their work.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise the standard of phonics (linking letters with the sounds they make) by:  good use of the assessment system to see all pupils learn at the right level and at a good rate of progress  ensuring the way activities are organised enables pupils to learn well.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Make effective use of the government’s additional sports funding to:  implement plans quickly so pupils benefit faster  define precisely how the impact of this work can be measured and evaluated.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 When children start school in Reception their skills and experiences vary greatly. This year, for example, they are at the level expected for this age, while over the last three years they have been below. They make good progress because they learn from a wide range of interesting tasks, some they choose and some chosen by their teachers.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Progress through the rest of the school is good. About eight in every ten pupils make expected or better progress.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 In three of the last five years, when Year 2 reading, writing and mathematics test results are combined, pupils have reached very high levels compared with those nationally.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Last year, results were broadly the same as pupils elsewhere in the country in reading and writing. While these pupils made similarly good progress to those in previous years, they started from lower levels. The exception was mathematics. Although most pupils reached the expected level, few exceeded it.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Information about pupils’ progress suggests that this year’s Year 2 will also make good progress but, because they also started from lower levels, they will catch up with pupils elsewhere, not overtake them.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils’ knowledge and understanding of phonics, and use of this skill in their reading, is relatively weak. In the recent Year 1 phonics check a much lower proportion of pupils than in other schools were at the expected level. Phonics is taught in large groups including pupils of a wide ability range. As a result, some find tasks too easy while others find tasks too hard. In addition, although the school has greatly improved how pupils’ progress is tracked, this information is not used to set targets or make sure pupils learn at a good rate.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The relatively high proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs generally make good progress because learning assistants repeat anything they have not understood and give them longer to absorb new learning.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 There are not enough pupils known to be eligible for support through the pupil premium to comment on their attainment without identifying them. Last year, all those eligible in the school who did not have special educational needs made good progress and most reached higher levels than their peers.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils generally show good attitudes to learning and want to do well. However, some pupils, mainly boys, have lower standards of handwriting because they do not routinely try their best.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils’ positive attitudes, enthusiasm and curiosity to learn play an important part in their learning. A Year 2 pupil, for example, recognised patterns in the numbers his class were using, and felt proud to explain what may have caused it.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Reception children’s learning benefits from watching and learning from the older children in their class.  Pupils say they like the clarity of knowing at the start of each lesson what they are expected to do and how they will know they have achieved it.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Pupils are alert during whole class discussions because teachers make sure pupils do not know who will be asked to contribute next.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Pupils are made to think carefully because teachers make sure they ask questions that are hard enough for each pupil.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 More-able pupils do well because teachers watch how they are doing during the lesson and make the task more difficult if necessary.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Pupils who struggle with reading, writing or mathematics do well because learning assistants take them back over the work in more detail until they have understood.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers often carefully position pupils who struggle so that they are near an adult who can check they have understood, so that they are always able to learn.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Pupils’ ability to judge for themselves how they are doing, and decide where they need to try harder, varies between classes because they are not all given similar opportunities to learn and practise these skills.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Some boys produce untidy work because their teachers do not insist that they do their best. Their handwriting, too, can be more careful on the first day of term than it is on the last.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers’ marking clearly states what pupils have achieved, but pupils struggle to identify any specific examples of where their teacher’s marking helps them improve.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 The behaviour of pupils is good. They behave well in the classroom and around the school. There are a few inconsistencies between staff so pupils are not always sure of the expectations. Exclusions are very rare and only occur for appropriate reasons.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 The majority of pupils have very positive relationships with the adults they work with. They are polite to staff because staff are polite to them and to each other. As a result, lessons flow without interruption.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils want to learn and are proud of their accomplishments especially recognition at the ‘achievement assembly’, itself suggested by pupils.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Year 2 pupils enjoy the opportunities to play an important role in the life of their school. For example, those in the school council conduct the annual survey of pupils’ views.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 The school council has an important part to play as their views are sought at an early stage of designing the school’s development plan.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 After training, older pupils act as ‘playground buddies’ demonstrating various games to the youngest children and contributing to the positive feel of playtime. The activity area, introduced to improve behaviour, is beneficial.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Eating lunch is an equally positive experience because pupils enjoy sitting in the ‘family’ groups and chatting amiably with older pupils who help them at each table.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Assemblies continue the relaxed but respectful family atmosphere and help build pupils’ good spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. For example, pupils were keen to offer the characteristics of a ‘super child’, and quickly realised many of them, such as ‘helpful’, described themselves.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 The school’s work to keep pupils safe and secure is good. Pupils have a good awareness of safety and the eldest enjoy the responsibility they have to look after the youngest at play and lunchtimes.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils have a basic understanding of the various types of bullying, including dangers associated with the use of the internet, and know that they should report any concerns to an adult.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Some pupils, mainly boys, happily settle for presenting work less than their best, or handwriting that is no better than they did in the past.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Attendance is close to the national average for primary schools and pupils are generally on time for school.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Nearly everyone, including the pupils, contribute to shaping the school’s development plan. The exception is parents, and the school has yet to find a meaningful way of canvassing their views.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The partnership with parents is generally strong. Parents regularly attend the ‘cafes’ when helpful techniques are shared with them so they can better support their children’s learning.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The school benefits from a strong leadership team which demonstrates a capacity for further improvement. The innovative co-headship is seen as enabling leaders with complementary skills to work together, and staff feel that this works well.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Leaders successfully promote equal opportunities and ensure that there is no discrimination within the school.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 School leaders responded very quickly to the dip in 2013 Year 2 mathematics results, giving greater emphasis to problem-solving activities that enable pupils to practise the skills to reach higher levels. In areas such as phonics, however, response has been insufficient.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Good links are made between subjects, so that what is learnt in one is applied in another. Visits, visitors and the good range of clubs enrich learning. Some activities, such as forest schools, are particularly chosen to engage the high proportion of boys.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 A strength of the school is that staffs’ skills and expertise are recognised and fostered through quality training, to the benefit of pupils. Staff are encouraged to take on leadership roles and look for ways to apply what they learn.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 A thorough audit of staff skills has given the school information to plan the use of additional sports’ funding. However, nothing has yet been put in place and no clear plans exist for how the school will check the money is well spent.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The school has a very good reputation for meeting the special educational needs of pupils, and draws on the expertise and resources of a local special school.

p.7

The leadership and management are good

 Links with the local cluster of schools are strong. Pupils benefit from the opportunity to work together, for example to sing in a large group. Staff benefit from sharing ideas.

p.7

The leadership and management are good

 Links with both the pre-school and junior school are strong so that transitions are well managed. Junior pupils return as sports leaders and staff from the two schools train together when beneficial.

p.7

The leadership and management are good

 Because the school is successful, the local authority has little direct involvement in it.

p.7

The leadership and management are good

 The governance of the school:  A relatively small group of governors are very active in shaping the school’s direction. These governors have a clear understanding of what is working well and what needs to be improved. Even so, the work of the governing body is hampered because it generally has vacancies, currently six of the 14 places. Governors undertake training so they know what is expected of them. Because they visit the school they know what teaching is like. They know how performance management is used to raise the quality of teaching, and have plans in place to reward good teaching, and to tackle underperformance. They know how the budget is spent. They know how the pupil premium funding is spent but do not know precisely how each action impacts on pupils’ achievement. They are diligent about safeguarding pupils and ensuring this and all other legal requirements are met.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 120896 Local authority Norfolk Inspection number 431259

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Infant School category Community Age range of pupils 4–7 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 116 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mrs Rachel Leighton Headteacher Ms Catharine Smith and Mrs Victoria Wyatt Date of previous school inspection 26 February 2009 Telephone number 01603 898483 Fax number 01603 893372 Email address office@spixworth.norfolk.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion